Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  parliamentary speech
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
An opening speech is avariant of aparliamentary speech delivered by the Speaker of the Sejm at the beginning of each day of parliamentary debate. It differs from other types of parliamentary speeches, because typically the latter represents the rhetoric style, whereas an opening speech combines rhetoric and official styles. The former style predominated until the 19th century, while after 1861 atypically official style begins to predominate. It has always been amulti-segment text, but the number of segments and their character have evolved with time. Thus, the number of elements of the composition is limited and the degree of their mandatory nature varies, which results from, e.g. external determinants (context). When illocutions are concerned, their general aims never change, contrary to detailed aims, even though since the times of the Diet of the Kingdom of Galicia relative stability may be observed in this respect. The stylistic aspect is the most significant. Although a feature of the opening speech is its openness, its form is schematic allowing for certain modifications. Two phenomena may be observed here — restricting the repertory of means (petrification, standardisation) and enriching the texts with etiquette formulas
PL
What will be analysed in the paper, from the pragmalinguistic perspective, is the specificity and the positioning of wishes in an MP’s speech as a particular type of text. In my research, I would like to shed some light on the multifunctioning of such speech acts in the public performances, to which parliamentary speeches belong, which stems from the multitude of their addressees. I will be particularly interested in the change of the illocutionary force of wishes which, thanks to the influence of the irony that they contain, may serve the opposition politicians to mock the ruling party’s MPs. This, in turn, can indirectly lead to the disparagement of the latter. In a broader sense it can also be the result of a general persuasive function of all political speeches. The marking of irony is very specific for a given culture or even the idiolect of particular MPs. The precise knowledge of the possible indirect readings of some MPs’ utterances, and the techniques for deciphering ironic expressions would be very valuable for interpreters who have just recently begun their work in e.g. the European Parliament, where the speeches of MPs are interpreted simultaneously.
EN
The author quotes the famous speech by Wincenty Witos in Reichsrat, delivered by him in Polish during World War I. The speech confirms the uncompromising stance of the peasant activists and their special services in working out a clear-cut stance on the matter of regaining independence by Poland. It had been agreed that the president of the Club should speak out on behalf of the peasant activists and present to the Parliament the problems which that group faced. They were issues brought about by the authorities, of political, social and economic nature, resulting from, among others, Russian occupation of Galicia and behavior of Austro-Hungarian troops towards local people after recapturing the province from the Russians.
EN
The article presents the parliamentary activity of Fr. Jan Czuj as a deputy to the Sejm of the Republic of Poland in the years 1922–1935 on behalf of the Polish Catholic-People’s Party. The main goal of this paper is to show various forms of his activity in the parliament which was especially parliamentary speeches and signing of the legislative proposals and interpellations. The main topics of the Fr. Jan Czuj’s interests during his career in the parliament are shown through the analysis of the parliamentary sources which are stenographic records, documents and interpellations. Also, his activity as a member of parliament is evaluated which leads to the conclusion that during the thirteen years of his presence in the lower house of the Polish legislature, he was not a very diligent deputy.
PL
W niniejszym artykule przedstawiono działalność parlamentarną ks. Jana Czuja jako posła na Sejm RP w latach 1922–1935 z ramienia Polskiego Stronnictwa Katolicko-Ludowego. Skupiono się głównie na omówieniu poszczególnych form jego aktywności na forum izby, przejawiającej się w przemówieniach sejmowych oraz składaniu podpisu pod wnioskami poselskimi i interpelacjami. Opierając się na analizie źródeł parlamentarnych w postaci sprawozdań stenograficznych z posiedzeń sejmu, druków sejmowych i tekstów interpelacji, przybliżono zakres tematów i zagadnień, wokół których ogniskowała się aktywność parlamentarna ks. J. Czuja. Oszacowano również skalę tej aktywności, co doprowadziło do konstatacji, że w trakcie swej trzynastoletniej obecności w parlamencie należał on raczej do grona posłów mało aktywnych.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.