Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 11

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  penal measure
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The author, comparing driving licence confiscation carried out on the basis of Articles 137 § 1 point 1 of The Road Traffic Act with the preventive measure under Articles 276 of the Code of Penal Procedure, consisting in an order to desist from driving a defined type of cars, indicates the existence of a legal gap in the Polish Penal Code, clearly consisting in a lack of regulations concerning counting the actual period of confiscation of a driving licence towards the period of an imposed driving ban. It can be complied at present with analogy of Articles 63 § 2 of the Penal Code. The ruling in this matter should be contained in the sentence (Art. 413 § 1 point 2 of the Code of Penal Procedure), and if the sentence does not contain this ruling, then the court takes it up with a resolution at a hearing (Art. 420 § 1 of the Code of Penal Procedure).
EN
The increasing popularity of restitutive justice in criminal law — characterised by development of measures which enable compensation of damage caused by a crime to the victim and at the same time place the victim of a prohibited act in a signifi cant position in the proceedings — encourage refl ection on the degree to which compensation is refl ected in the petty offence law. The author analyses the penal measure of damage compensation in petty offences. Her de lege ferenda conclusions may contribute to an enhancement of the role of compensation in petty offence law.
The Lawyer Quarterly
|
2022
|
vol. 12
|
issue 2
128-140
EN
The article presents, in a comprehensive manner, the current model of the disqualification from driving vehicles (driving ban) in the petty offences law. Using historical references, the author discusses regulations adopted in this regard, taking account of the doubts arising as to the interpretation of certain aspects of the functioning of the ban. Indicating areas which in the author’s opinion prove that the driving ban’s current formulation is flawed, she signals the need for further amendments, which would lead to the establishment of more rational normative solutions.
EN
The article presents the problem of confiscation or forfeiture of property under the Tax Penal Code. It contains an analysis of the premises for application of forfeiture of financial benefits and the changes that concerned them. Particular attention was paid to the essence of the institution operating on the basis of the Tax Penal Code, comparing it to the relevant regulations of the Penal Code. The principles behind the application of this penal measure were indicated and the subjective scope of its application was discussed. Also the standpoint which takes into account the positive developments was presented, as well as criticisms relating to certain solutions. As a result, the conducted considerations pointed to the need to fill in the normative gaps in such a way that the forfeiture of financial benefits could be used as a rational instrument of fiscal penal policy.
EN
Abstract Penal measure in the form of ban on entering gaming centers and participation in gambling did not appear in the original version of the Criminal Code from 1997 year. It was introduced into the catalog of penalties specified in the Article 39 C.C. by the law on gambling of 19 November 2009. Purpose The purpose of this study is to look more closely into regulations on this penalty. The analysis presents remarks on the merit of the ban, meaning of it in particular, scope, conditions for application, mode of judgment, duration time, and execution. Besides, exemplary offences described in detailed part of the Criminal Code are indicated, which, if committed, may justify court judgment. It is also noted that judgment of banning entry to gaming centers and gambling is not possible for perpetrators of offences specified in Chapter 9 of Fiscal Criminal Code. Therefore, the study also includes suggestions de lege ferenda. Research method The research method was conducted during the preparation of the study which was a dogmatic approach. The arrangements within this research have a theoretical undertone. As well, normative materials, doctrine views and judicial decisions were taken into consideration. Result of reflections As a result of reflections, it has been stated that Article 41 C.C. is imprecise. The wordings included are ambiguous. Resulting in the raise of concern in the various interpretations. According to the authors, caring out these modifications might allow for the ruling of this ban to also serve against perpetrators of the crimes in the Treasury Organizations of Gambling. This would provide an opportunity for the system location to change these offenses. Creating this chapter concerning penal provisions and the crimes listed about within The Gambling Law, will lead to a conversion of the common categories of offenses. Therefore, it will give the opportunity to rule against perpetrators of the Ban On Entering Gaming Centers and participating in the games of chance. The main conclusion In conclusion, the statement introduced in Act of 19 November 2009 about gambling, was not well-thought-out. Thus, it does not provide or guarantee comprehensive implementations to the main objective of the introduction to the ban. That main objective being to prevent those who have committed previous or current offenses from participating in the games.
EN
The article presents the issue of executing the penal measure ofprohibition of holding certain positions in relation to the legal consequences of a conviction in the form of a ban on performing functions in a commercial company. The object of study is to present similarities and differences between the two institutions. Consequently, the subject of analysis are issues concerning the initial moments of the two institutions, as well as the circumstances affecting their duration.
PL
The study aims on selected problems associated with appending the enforcement clause on the redress of damage in Polish Criminal law. The difference between the redress of damage as a penal measure and as a probationary measure outlined by The Polish Supreme Court is significant for the analysed perspective. The author indicates that the Supreme Court claims, that a probationary measure enforcement clause could be put on the redress of damage only after the expiration of a period of time appointed by the court to the perpetrator to compensate for the harm caused by a crime. Due to the outlined interpretation by the Polish Supreme Court the author finds the presented statement as not rightful due to the wrong interpretation of the law and flagrant infringement of rights of the victims of the crimes.
Ius Novum
|
2022
|
vol. 16
|
issue 4
7-22
EN
The main scientific aim of the article is to present and analyse the amendment of 14 October2021 to the prerequisites of disfranchisement laid down in Article 40 § 2 CC. The initialconsiderations focus on the essence and significance of the aforementioned penal measure inthe system of penal measures determined in Criminal Code. The article presents the legal statebefore the amendment and the reasons for the amendment presented by the authors of the bill.As concerns the change of law within the scope of prerequisites of disfranchisement, the articletries to confront the mutual relationships of the present prerequisites. The considerations madeit possible to formulate a series of critical conclusions concerning the legislative changesintroduced and constituted and impulse to put forward a proposal de lege ferenda.
PL
Głównym celem naukowym niniejszego opracowania jest przedstawienie i analiza zmodyfikowanychprzez nowelę z 14 października 2021 r. przesłanek orzeczenia pozbawienia prawpublicznych zawartych aktualnie w art. 40 § 2 k.k. Rozważania wstępne koncentrują się naprzedstawieniu istoty i znaczenia wymienionego środka karnego w systemie środków karnychokreślonych w Kodeksie karnym. Zaprezentowano stan prawny w tym zakresie obowiązującyprzez nowelą i wskazane przez projektodawców przyczyny dokonanej modyfikacji ustawowej.W związku ze zmianą prawa w obrębie przesłanek orzeczenia pozbawienia praw publicznychpodjęto próbę skonfrontowania i wzajemnej relacji aktualnych przesłanek. Rozważania w tymobszarze pozwoliły na sformułowanie wielu wniosków krytycznych w odniesieniu do wprowadzonychzmian legislacyjnych i stanowiły asumpt do wysunięcia postulatu de lege ferenda.
Ius Novum
|
2023
|
vol. 17
|
issue 4 ENG
60-76
PL
This scientific article researches the procedure for issuing a European protection order by a Polish court or public prosecutor, resulting in the enforcement of protective, penal, or probation measures by a competent judicial or equivalent authority in a Member State of the European Union. These measures require refraining from staying in certain environments or places and avoiding contact with or proximity to certain people. This article does not cover provisions concerning the execution of such an order by the competent authority of a Member State. The main research objective is to demonstrate the importance of this measure in continuing the protection of the aggrieved in another Member State. The research findings are original and primarily national in scope but also relevant to other countries due to their relation to an EU instrument. This article analyses the essence of the European protection order, its issuance requirements, including the ruling on the aggrieved’s protection measure, necessity of issuing the order, aggrieved’s motion, issuance proceedings, authorised issuing authorities, ruling form, forum for issuance, issuance mode, right to appeal, order transmission, and information obligations. The paper is significant for its in-depth dogmatic analysis and substantial theoretical content and is practical in guiding interpretation of the requirements for the application of this measure and the issuance procedure.
EN
This study is devoted to the issue of the legal limitation of the entrepreneur’s ability to run a business. The study attempts to show what economic activity is, what is its scope and subject matter, and what may be the consequences of the prohibition of conducting business activity against an entrepreneur who is respectively: a natural person, a legal person or an organizational unit without legal personality, and having legal capacity. Depending on the legal status of the entrepreneur, the adjudicated ban on running a business (irrespective of its basis) may give rise to various consequences of an existential nature of the entrepreneur.
PL
Niniejszy artykuł dotyczy zagadnienia prawnej limitacji możliwości prowadzenia działalności gospodarczej przez przedsiębiorcę. W opracowaniu starano się przybliżyć, czym jest działalność gospodarcza, jaki jest jej zakres przedmiotowy i podmiotowy, a także jakie mogą być konsekwencje orzeczenia zakazu prowadzenia działalności gospodarczej względem przedsiębiorcy, który jest odpowiednio: osobą fizyczną, osobą prawną lub jednostką organizacyjną nieposiadającą osobowości prawnej, a mającą zdolność do czynności prawnej. W zależności od statusu prawnego przedsiębiorcy, orzeczony zakaz prowadzenia działalności gospodarczej (bez względu na jego podstawę zastosowania) może rodzić różne konsekwencje natury egzystencjalnej po stronie przedsiębiorcy.
11
51%
Ius Novum
|
2023
|
vol. 17
|
issue 4
61-78
EN
The article is of scientific nature and undertakes research into the procedure of issuance of the European protection order by a Polish court or a public prosecutor, resulting in the execution of a protective, penal or probation measure by a competent judicial or equivalent authority in a Member State of the European Union, which requires refraining from staying in certain environments or places, and contacting or approaching certain people. The regulation concerning the execution of such an order by the competent authority of a Member State has been omitted herein. The aim of the main research theses is to show that this measure plays an important role as makes it possible to continue the protection of the aggrieved in another Member State. The research findings are original in character. They have primarily national range but can also be useful in other countries due to the fact that they relate to the EU instrument. The article analyses the essence of the European protection order, the requirements for its issuance, including the ruling on the measure of protection of the aggrieved, the necessity of the issuance of the European protection order to protect the rights of the aggrieved, the motion of the aggrieved, the European protection order issuance proceeding, in particular the authorities authorised to issue it, the form of the ruling, the forum for its issuance, the issuance mode, entitlement to appeal, the transmission of the European protection order, and information obligations. The paper is important for science because it contains an in-depth dogmatic analysis and a large load of theoretical thought, as well as for practice, as it indicates the direction of interpretation of the requirements for the application of this measure and the issuance procedure.
PL
Artykuł ma charakter naukowo-badawczy, a jego przedmiotem jest wydanie europejskiego nakazu ochrony przez polski sąd lub polskiego prokuratora, obejmującego wykonanie przez właściwy sąd lub inny organ państwa członkowskiego Unii Europejskiej środka zapobiegawczego, karnego i probacyjnego w zakresie powstrzymywania się od przebywania w określonych środowiskach lub miejscach, kontaktowania się z określonymi osobami lub zbliżania się do określonych osób. Pominięta została regulacja wykonania takiego nakazu przez właściwy organ państwa członkowskiego. Celem głównych tez badawczych było wykazanie, że środek ten spełnia istotną rolę, umożliwiając kontynuowanie ochrony pokrzywdzonego w innym państwie członkowskim. Wyniki badania mają oryginalny charakter. Mają one przede wszystkim zasięg krajowy, ale mogą być przydatne również w innych państwach ze względu na to, że dotyczą instrumentu unijnego. Analizie zostały poddane: istota europejskiego nakazu ochrony, przesłanki jego wydania, w tym orzeczenie środka ochrony pokrzywdzonego, niezbędność wydania europejskiego nakazu dla ochrony praw pokrzywdzonego, wniosek pokrzywdzonego, postępowanie w przedmiocie wydania europejskiego nakazu ochrony, w szczególności organy uprawnione do jego wydania, forma orzeczenia, forum jego wydania, tryb wydania, zaskarżalność, przekazanie europejskiego nakazu oraz obowiązki informacyjne. Opracowanie ma istotne znaczenie dla nauki, gdyż zawiera pogłębioną analizę dogmatyczną i duży ładunek myśli teoretycznej, a także dla praktyki, wskazuje bowiem kierunki interpretacji przesłanek stosowania tego środka oraz postępowania w przedmiocie jego wydania.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.