Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help
Authors help
Years help

Results found: 41

first rewind previous Page / 3 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  philology
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 3 next fast forward last
1
100%
EN
This article focuses on selected nonstandard variants of the Czech demonym Lotyš (Latvian) and their usage.
EN
This article provides an overview of articles devoted to Polish literature, published in 2000 to 2009 in the “Baltiyskiy Filologicheskiy Kuryer” - a scientific journal dedicated to problems of modern philology (Kaliningrad, Immanuel Kant Russian State University, edited by prof. W.I. Greshnych and associates).
EN
The Polish version of the article was published in “Roczniki Humanistyczne,” vol. 59 (2011), issue 1. The article is the editor-in-chief’s comment to the discussion between Agnieszka Czechowicz and Paweł Bohuszewicz as presented in the current issue of the journal. The author defends philological methods in studying early modern literary texts and expresses her scepticism concerning any methods questioning and negating the fundamental epistemological difference between what is being studied and a researcher himself.
EN
Literary history was long treated as part of philology, lacking its own distinct methodological foundations. The basic prerequisite for promoting it as an independent discipline was to find a way to formulate what it dealt with and how. Its existence next had to be ensured by institutionalizing it, particularly by publishing a scholarly journal to communicate the new discipline and establishing a university chair to ensure its continuity. The “Vlček School” managed to do this thanks in particular to relations with scholars in other countries. Impulses were provided by the encounter with German and French positivist literary scholarship, by becoming familiar with journals of literary studies abroad, and by finding models in German universities, museums, and other organizations where the study of literature was taking place. In the late nineteenth century Jaroslav Vlček (1860–1930) habilitated to teach Czech Literature at the Czech part of Prague University, and Jan Jakubec (1862–1936) decided to prepare for his habilitation abroad, spending two semesters as a full-time student at Vienna and Berlin. (Studying abroad was important for other researchers as well: Arne Novák [1880–1939] and Otokar Fischer [1883–1938], for example, studied in Berlin in the early years of the twentieth century.) Vlček’s lectures were a success, yet he did not yet manage to establish the study of Czech literature as an independent field. Jakubec and Vlček therefore sought to start up a periodical for the discipline. This idea was not at first, however, carried out in full; the resulting journal, Obzor literární a umělecký (Literature and Art Review), edited by Vlček, was more like a review of literary criticism, which also ran longer articles and essays on methodology. Despite all the ups and downs it was in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries that Vlček and his colleagues eventually did manage to establish literary history both at the university and in periodicals. Similarly to German researchers they focused on more recent literature. They began to prepare a critical edition of works by nineteenth-century Czech writers of belles-lettres, and initiated a group project devoted to the history of Czech literature of the period. Methodologically, however, their inspiration was French positivism. The field soon began to attract people to work in it. Researchers defended the new conception of literary history in articles on theory and method. By the beginning of the twentieth century works of literary history had become an integral part of studies in the humanities. dKNAV is powered by EPrints 3, administered by the library of the Academy of Sciences. More informati
EN
The article is split into two parts. In the first one, author postulates interpreting Stefan Szymutko’s oeuvre within a broad context of „philological practices” and tries to describe the big array of modern returns to philology both in the Western countries and Poland. In second part he sets out the methodological problems, which awaits for the reasercher trying to establish Szymutko’s text corpus. Author, inspired by Derrida’s hauntology, shows that not available, currently unexisting or potentialy existing texts may became the object of literary scholar’s interest.
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Otwarty świat. Addenda

71%
EN
Author’s response to review essays of Laboratorium antropofikcji. Dociekania filologiczne by Przemysław Czapliński and Paweł Kaczmarski.
PL
Odpowiedź autora na eseje recenzyjne poświęcone książce Laboratorium antropofikcji. Dociekania filologiczne (2014).
EN
The aim of the article is to show the relationship between the classical conception of philology, the origins of hermeneutics and the evolution of the idea of universal religion from Antiquity to the 19th century. Just like in the context of the beginnings of Christianity philology contributed to create the Catholic understanding of this idea, in modern times, the development of philological methods contributed to the fragmentation of the idea in various fields: philosophical, esoteric, naturalistic or humanitarian. Hence, philology appears to be inseparable from hermeneutics and the history of religious ideas, and the latter, as inseparable from philology. In this context, the myth of the Babel Tower and its “confusion of tongues” may gain a new meaning.
8
Content available remote

Jan Baudouin de Courtenay i Al eksander Brückner1

70%
EN
The article presents the lives and mutual relations between two outstanding Polish scholars, professors of lingusistics and philology at universities in Russia and Germany at the end of the Partitions of Poland. Brückner in Berlin and Baudouin de Courtenay in Petersburg (earlier Kazan and Dorpat) can be considered amabssadors of Polish culture and research. The relations between them were a mixture of reverence and contempt, involving Baudouin’s students, Kruszewski and Ułaszyn who remained in conflict with Brückner. Their fate and the decisions made by both leading figures of Polish linguistics before, during and after the Great War of 1914–1918, show the difference in their approach to linguistic research and contemporary political issues.
EN
The question whether Tadeusz Kowalski, the founder of the Oriental philological studies in Poland, should first of all be considered a Turcologist or an Arabist has been disputed many times thus far but no satisfactory answer could be given. A new-found short occasional poem by Kowalski sheds light on the matter because the author calls himself a Turk and he adduces two etymologically Arabic words in their Turkish guise.
EN
The article analyzes different ways of constructing Silesian spaces in two essays written by Silesian literary critics, Stefan Szymutko and Mariusz Jochemczyk: Nagrobek ciotki Cili and Wokół tradycji. Śląskie szkice oikologiczne. The author interprets the differences between the aforementioned books in the context of different cultural-political situations, in which Szymutko and Jochemczyk wrote their books.
EN
This article utilizes the special issue theme to discuss old disciplinary boundaries in the study of rhetoric that has limited American and Eurasian academic connections, and to begin the process of creating new global collaborative territories. Current boundaries have produced several intellectual and scholarly gaps, including differences in institutional hierarchies, and economic challenges that are threatening higher education from a variety of standpoints. In addition, eclectic theoretical foundations, conceptual differences with the words communication and communications and differing institutional nomenclatures for American communication departments provide additional impediments. This article subsequently suggests five avenues for erecting global disciplinary bridges for new collaborative territories, including increased awareness of scholarly histories, international scholars, the perceptions of the relationships between rhetoric, argumentation, and persuasion, and scholarly organizations as well as taking advantage of synchronous and asynchronous technologies that can foster mutual global scholarly awareness and participation.
EN
The study aims to clarify the relations between the philological scene in Bohemia and Berlin as a centre of certain “transfer of knowledge”, and attempts to outline the academic atmosphere in Berlin (the trends, potential stimuli, changes of institutional background) that the Czech philologists entered into in the years 1878–1886. Thence the attention is focused on the years 1874–1877 when the Germanist Ernst Martin worked in Prague, also as a mentor of several scholars that in later years contributed to the exploration of the history of German letters in Bohemia – namely Wendelin Toischer (he resided in Berlin at the end of the 1870s). The study observes the key significance of Karl Müllenhoff and Wilhelm Scherrer for the orientation of the branch / field of study with a particular set of instructions, rules, techniques and expectations. The emanation of his influence in the environment of Prague was undoubtedly connected with the staffing of chairs for German philology at the joint and, later on, German university in the city. The crucial person of German-speaking philological community in Prague was Johann von Kelle who also supervised the scholarly growth of the Germanist Arnošt Kraus who spent a semester in Berlin in 1882/1883; Jakob Minor worked in Prague for some years, later on he was replaced by August Sauer. The exposition is concluded by the portrayal of the shock aroused by the death of Wilhelm Scherer (in the summer of 1886).
13
Content available remote

Profesor Witold Mańczak jako iberysta

70%
EN
The paper is devoted to the figure of Professor Witold Mańczak and his long-term collaboration with Hispanic studies in Cracow; hence the appearance of motifs related to his didactic and scientific work, but also a personal recollection of Professor as a teacher and a linguist. The paper is completed by a bibliography of those of his works which directly or indirectly discuss the Spanish language.
XX
The Polish version of the article was published in “Roczniki Humanistyczne,” vol. 59 (2011), issue 1. The article Dangerous liaisons, necessary liaisons. On the “alternative” ways of reading Old Polish texts is a polemic with Agnieszka Czechowicz’s text Uwagi o przymusach metodologicznych w badaniach literatury staropolskiej (Remarks on methodological compulsion in studies of Old Polish literature), in which so-called “alternative” methods (Deconstruction, gender, etc.) of reading Old Polish texts are criticized on the basis of the assumption that they deform their true image. The present polemic uses a completely different assumption: there is nothing wrong in using methods coming from outside the context of the studied texts, for the works do not have a certain meaning in itself, but only an “osmotic” meaning. Textual “osmosis” is the almost infinite, but also limited by the semantic potential, openness of the text—not only to the contexts that the author foresaw, but also to the contexts that come from the commentator’s culture, and to whose existence the “alternative methods” may draw our attention.
15
61%
EN
This article provides the editio princeps of an Old Nubian land sale discovered in Gebel Adda in 1966. The document details the sale of several plots of land to and by a woman called Sewamē and her son Newarē. The first part of the sale contains a short description of the sale, followed by an extended curse containing several terms not previously attested in Old Nubian. The second part starts with an invocation of the Trinity in Greek and Old Nubian, followed by the protocol and a second, expanded description of the sale. This is followed by a list of witnesses and (largely illegible) signature of the scribe. After a transcription, translation, and grammatical analysis of the text, there is an extended commentary of its linguistic features and the question of its dating.
Pamiętnik Literacki
|
2021
|
vol. 112
|
issue 3
233-256
PL
Artykuł omawia relacje dotyczące XIX-wiecznej ewolucji historii idei i jej związków z badaniami literackimi. Przez cały wiek trwała debata, czy filologia, filozofia i historia są osobnymi naukami humanistycznymi, czy też stanowią elementy większej całości zwanej potocznie „humanistyką” lub „naukami humanistycznymi”. Idea jako pojęcie związane z filozofią poznania stała się jednym z głównych obszarów sporu. W artykule proponuję interpretację eseju „Milczenie” Cypriana Norwida jako tekstu, który został zaplanowany przez poetę, by włączyć się w ten spór.
EN
The article examines the 19th century evolution of history of ideas and its relatedness to literary studies. The debate whether philology, philosophy, and history are autonomous humanistic disciplines or they make up a part of what is informally referred to as “humanities” or “humanistic sciences” lasted for the whole century. The idea, seen as a notion connected with philosophy of cognition, became the central part of the debate. In the present paper I suggest an interpretation of Cyprian Norwid’s essay “Milczenie” (“Silence”) as a text designed by the poet to enter this debate.
EN
The aim of this article is to discuss the place of the literature of past centuries in the romance philology teaching programmes. I accentuate the social importance of literary subjects at the university in the making of future citizens responsible for the common good, as well as the social importance of literature itself. Furthermore, I emphasize the role of scholars who are assumed not only to bring knowledge to their students, but also to teach them essential social skills. The analysis is based on my ten-year academic experience of specialist in the history of literature and history of the French Enlightenment.
EN
Once a demand of the student movement of the 1960s, the call for more practical relevance in higher education is being expressed again in student surveys. This has gained importance across Europe, not least as a consequence of the implementation of the Bologna Reform. Alongside employability and competence orientation, practical orientation has become one of the central issues in the debate about the curricular focus of university programmes. This paper seeks to briefly outline the concepts behind the keywords employability, competence orientation and practice orientation and discuss how they relate to the traditional (self-)understanding of universities. On the basis of examples it will then consider what concrete contributions Applied Linguistics as an academic discipline (along with its sub-disciplines) can make to the practical orientation of degrees in languages.
19
61%
EN
In this brief note, I ofer correctionsto two interpretations from the editio princeps of a series of legends on a painting in room 5 in the Southwest Annex of the Monastery on Kom H in Dongola.
EN
In the present paper, we offer a glimpse at a classic, canonical book on philology (namely Initiation à la philologie française, by N.N. Condeescu, published in 1969) and at its (ir)relevance against the backdrop of the evolution of philological studies from the 1970s to the language and literature studies of the new millennium. The article is therefore a reflection on philology (a term as vague in Romanian as it is in French) and on its scope of application in Romania.
first rewind previous Page / 3 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.