Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 7

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  philosophizing
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
One can do philosophy on either the academic or the amateur level. Unfortunately, neither one nor the other will solve existential problems once and for all. The article contains ten short philosophical reflections, carried out in a way that should be useful for the amateur philosopher, but with the erudite footnotes which the academic researcher of philosophy is obliged to provide. Each reflection ends with a question to which philosophy cannot find a definitive answer; this suggests that, from a pragmatic point of view, philosophizing is fruitless and pointless.
2
Content available remote

Co to znaczy filozofować?

75%
EN
A philosophy teacher should constantly raise the question about the form of philosophical education. Following this need I undertook the problem “what is the philosophizing” once again. The results of this reflection are the following paper presented. It has two main parts. In the first – I present the philosophizing as rational reasoning which has to do with science and with common sense thinking even. In the second part – I point out a set of properties specific to philosophizing.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Co to znaczy filozofować?

75%
EN
A philosophy teacher should constantly raise the question about the form of philosophical education. Following this need I undertook the problem “what is the philosophizing” once again. The results of this reflection are the following paper presented. It has two main parts. In the first – I present the philosophizing as rational reasoning which has to do with science and with common sense thinking even. In the second part – I point out a set of properties specific to philosophizing.
EN
Ludwig Wittgenstein’s philosophizing is deeply ontological, and can be defined as a reflexive gesture of keeping silent. The silence secured by reflexing is an essential part of a philosophy. A philosopher has to use language, but things that pass over in silence must influence things he or she says. The speech manifests not only in the spoken, but also in the unspoken. How is it possible? Through understanding a reflexive speech as an action or gesture of annihilation of speech. The expressed words in philosophy and expressed philosophical concepts are just means of referring to the ultimate value which should be thrown away immediately because it cannot say anything about the inexpress-ible. The philosophy as a gesture of keeping silent is an attempt to meaningfully keep silent through the constantly evolving reflexive annihilation of your own speech. The philosophizing which takes into account the importance of silence becomes a minimal-istic gesture.
Avant
|
2017
|
vol. 8
|
issue 3
EN
The article raises the question of cultural function of philosophy and acts of philosophizing. The argument that follows reinterprets Leszek Nowak’s and Józef Niżnik’s metaphilosophical theories as philosophical culture, i.e. the essential features of philosophy indicated by Nowak and Niżnik, are viewed as relatively common presuppositions about philosophy shared by philosophers (implicitly or explicitly). In this way, viewing philosophy as cultural game leads to the question of what kind of epistemological-cultural game philosophy would be. I address the question by referring to Andrzej Zybertowicz’s model of four types of epistemological-cultural games: reproduction, discovery, redefinition, and design. In the final part of the text, I follow Niżnik’s idea that the function of philosophy is to patch up cracks (which I dub “ontological holes) in human symbolic universe and briefly analyze two examples from history of philosophy of such breaks that lead to development of fully fledged philosophical stances.
PL
Artykuł stawia pytanie o kulturową funkcję filozofii oraz filozofowania i analizuje metafilozofię Leszka Nowaka i Józefa Niżnika interpretując je jako kulturę filozofii. To znaczy, redefiniuje ogólne cechy filozofii, wskazane przez Nowaka i Niżnika w ich analizach metafilozoficznych, jako względnie powszechnie podzielane przez filozofów założenia na temat ich dyscypliny. Tego rodzaju redefinicja filozofii jako gry kulturowej pozwala zapytać w dalszej kolejności o to, jakiego rodzaju poznawczą grą kulturową jest filozofia. Aby odpowiedzieć na to pytanie stosuję model czterech typów poznania Andrzeja Zybertowicza, który wyróżnia odtwarzanie, odkrywanie, redefiniowanie oraz projektowanie gier kulturowych. Na koniec tekstu podążam za tezą Niżnika mówiącą, że funkcja filozofii polega na uspójnianiu uniwersum symbolicznego w sytuacjach jego naruszenia (co nazywam dziurami ontologicznymi) i przedstawiam dwa przykłady z historii filozofii rozpoznania tego rodzaju naruszenia, które następnie uzyskało filozoficzną konceptualizację.
Avant
|
2017
|
vol. 8
|
issue 3
PL
Artykuł stawia pytanie o kulturową funkcję filozofii oraz filozofowania i analizuje metafilozofię Leszka Nowaka i Józefa Niżnika interpretując je jako kulturę filozofii. To znaczy, redefiniuje ogólne cechy filozofii, wskazane przez Nowaka i Niżnika w ich analizach metafilozoficznych, jako względnie powszechnie podzielane przez filozofów założenia na temat ich dyscypliny. Tego rodzaju redefinicja filozofii jako gry kulturowej pozwala zapytać w dalszej kolejności o to, jakiego rodzaju poznawczą grą kulturową jest filozofia. Aby odpowiedzieć na to pytanie stosuję model czterech typów poznania Andrzeja Zybertowicza, który wyróżnia odtwarzanie, odkrywanie, redefiniowanie oraz projektowanie gier kulturowych. Na koniec tekstu podążam za tezą Niżnika mówiącą, że funkcja filozofii polega na uspójnianiu uniwersum symbolicznego w sytuacjach jego naruszenia (co nazywam dziurami ontologicznymi) i przedstawiam dwa przykłady z historii filozofii rozpoznania tego rodzaju naruszenia, które następnie uzyskało filozoficzną konceptualizację.
EN
The article raises the question of cultural function of philosophy and acts of philosophizing. The argument that follows reinterprets Leszek Nowak’s and Józef Niżnik’s metaphilosophical theories as philosophical culture, i.e. the essential features of philosophy indicated by Nowak and Niżnik, are viewed as relatively common presuppositions about philosophy shared by philosophers (implicitly or explicitly). In this way, viewing philosophy as cultural game leads to the question of what kind of epistemological-cultural game philosophy would be. I address the question by referring to Andrzej Zybertowicz’s model of four types of epistemological-cultural games: reproduction, discovery, redefinition, and design. In the final part of the text, I follow Niżnik’s idea that the function of philosophy is to patch up cracks (which I dub “ontological holes) in human symbolic universe and briefly analyze two examples from history of philosophy of such breaks that lead to development of fully fledged philosophical stances.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.