Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: plurale tantum

Sort By:

Limit search:

Příznak »tantum« v morfologii češtiny

100%

Vondráček M.

Bohemistyka

2020

issue 2

166-176

Defectibility of the paradigm of flexible word classes is generally described in grammar books within the periphery of a word class: (as the limitation of the numerical paradigm of pluralia tantum, substance and abstract nouns, as the aggradation of relational adjectives etc.) or within the particular grammatical category (as the absence of the 1st and 2nd person of impersonal verbs, imperative, vocative of impersonal nouns etc.). However, the actual corpora data only partly correspond to this rough concept. The purpose of this paper is to discuss such issues as to what extent these irregularities should be taken into account in terms of the automatic text processing, how they should be registered in databases such as Internetová jazyková příručka or to what extent they should be reflected in dictionaries

Neúplnost deklinačního/konjugačního paradigmatu ohebných slovních druhů je v obecné rovině popsána v gramatikách v rámci periferie slovního druhu (jako restrikce číselného paradigmatu jmen pomnožných, látkových a abstrakt, nestupňování vztahových adjektiv ap.), nebo v rámci gramatické kategorie (nepřítomnost tvarů 1. a 2. osoby neosobních sloves či jejich imperativu, nevytváření vokativu apersonálních jmen ap.). Skutečná korpusová data odpovídají této obecné charakteristice jen částečně. Cílem příspěvku je hledání odpovědi, do jaké míry s nepravidelnostmi počítat při automatickém zpracování textu, jak je evidovat v databázích typu Internetová jazyková příručka nebo do jaké míry je promítnout do slovníků.

Urzędowa i lokalna (gwarowa) odmiana toponimów na przykładzie dopełniacza wybranych nazw miejscowych typu singulare i plurale tantum

57%

Nobis I.

Onomastica

2016

vol. 60

249-271

This article is devoted to the official forms in the inflection of chosen toponyms in Poland and the variety of dialectal singular and plural place names. The variety of place names often diverges from the rules of language use, and causes language users problems. The toponyms have peculiar, locally used inflected forms; the outside-linguistic (non-linguistic) factors that are social and local factors, play an important role in the inflection of place names. The local population often uses other forms than those recommended by official sources. I focus my attention on the genitive forms of toponyms because it is mainly here that one can see clear variations in the official and local inflection of place names. The material shows that the singular masculine toponyms have genitive endings: -a (in theofficial variety), -u (in the local variety), for example Biłgoraj, gen. Biłgoraja, but in the local dialect: biłgoraju. The singular feminine place names have genitive endings: -ej (in the official variety), -y||-i (in the local variety): Brzezowa, gen. Brzezowej, but Brzezowy in the local dialect. The plural toponyms have genitive endings: -ø, -ów, -i (-y), but in the local circulation the ending -ów is dominant and demonstrates a wider expansion in use. For example Brzózki, gen. Brzózek, in the local variety Brzuskuf; Budy, official gen. Bud, but Buduf; Burnie, gen. Burni, in the local dialect: Burniuf. The gathered material reflects a hesitation in the inflection of toponyms, as the linguistic customs and presented dialectal records of forms of genitives of place names show a significantly diverse approach towards the Polish language.

Refine search results

1 Bohemistyka

1 Onomastica

1 2020

1 2016

1 Nobis I.

1 Vondráček M.

Search results

Příznak »tantum« v morfologii češtiny

Urzędowa i lokalna (gwarowa) odmiana toponimów na przykładzie dopełniacza wybranych nazw miejscowych typu singulare i plurale tantum