Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  political strategy
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article concerns the analysis of mechanisms of functioning of the party system and political market. The main problem, which is analyzed in the text, is the answer to the question to what extent the parties’ relationships are dependent on market factors, and to what extent they are autonomous and independent from the processes taking place in the market. Market factors are: the level of the political awareness of electors, their loyalty and the stability of election behaviours as well as character of media particularly their programme and political profile. However amongst factors from beyond market, the author focuses on the political tradition, the ideological identification of the party and the attitude of parties’ leaders.
EN
The article describes the Czech party system and its development over time using data from the annual financial reports of political parties and seeks to contribute to the domestic debate on the transformation of Czech political parties since 1989. The article distinguishes three factors that caused political party budgets to change – the economy, regulation, and strategy – and proposes a simple theoretical model with which to interpret and understand data obtained from the accounting books of political parties. It also presents a new three-dimensional typology of political parties based on the size of a party budget and the structure of party revenue and expenditures. The article concludes by arguing that understanding how all three of the aforementioned factors intersect could be useful for predicting the future development of party competition in the Czech Republic and facilitate the application of the ideas proposed herein to party systems abroad.
EN
Article deals with the problem of political strategies of social movements in the sixties, with particular attention to the issue of violence as a strategy of political action. Author tries to resolve the dilemma how violent actions contribute to the weakening of capitalism. Paradoxically they are counterproductive as they strengthen its repressive potential.
EN
The problem of distribution and consumption of intoxicating substances is considered a socially harmful phenomenon and Southeast Asia is a region particularly affected by drugs. In the face of this challenge, the heads of many states undertake radical actions, going beyond the legal framework, referred to as state vigilantism. Based on the example of three selected political leaders (Thaksin Shinawatra, Rodrigo Duterte and Joko Widodo), the author points out how radical strategies for fighting the drug problem contribute to increasing popularity, even though the problem has not been resolved since the early 1970s. Cross-comparison analysis of the three mentioned cases aims at identifying sources of effectiveness and attractiveness of populist methods that have not changed significantly for fifty years. Among them the author argues that vigilantism grows out of populism and takes the form of a spectacle containing such elements as dehumanising discourse, extrajudicial killings and the theme of the nation’s morality at risk.
EN
Populism has been a controversial category since the beginning of the scientific reflection on this phenomenon. As this article shows, this stems from the differences between researchers who differently hierachize the meaning of specific constitutive elements. More importantly, researchers often differ even as to which elements are necessary elements of the phenomenon. Therefore, these differences result from different views on the ontological status of populism. This leads to a tendency to use other empirical data and a different methodology. The purpose of this text is the critical analysis of the most typical and new ideas regarding ontological status of populism. The article also attempts to identify potential areas of agreement between individual approaches to populism: as a thin-core ideology, discourse, strategy and organization, political style, mobilization, discursive and stylistic repertoire, and interpretative framework.  
PL
Populizm jest kategorią budzącą spory od początku naukowej refleksji nad tym zjawiskiem. Jak pokazuje niniejszy artykuł jest to nie tylko pochodną różnicy między badaczami, odmiennie hierarchizującymi znaczenie poszczególnych elementów konstytutywnych. Co ważniejsze, badacze często różnią się nawet co do tego, które elementy są koniecznymi elementami zjawiska. Różnice te wynikają więc z odmiennych spojrzeń na status ontologiczny populizmu. Pociąga to za sobą skłonność do korzystania z innych danych empirycznych oraz odmiennej metodologii. Celem niniejszego tekstu jest krytyczna analiza najbardziej typowych, jak i nowych pomysłów dotyczących statusu ontologicznego populizmu. Artykuł usiłuje ponadto wskazać na potencjalne obszary zgodności pomiędzy poszczególnymi ujęciami populizmu: jako ideologii o cienkim rdzeniu, dyskursu, strategii i organizacji, stylu politycznego, mobilizacji, dyskursywnego i stylistycznego repertuaru, ramy interpretacyjnej.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.