Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 2 Studia Norwidiana

Years help

  1. 1 2020

  2. 1 2014

Authors help

  1. 2 Okulicz-Kozaryn R.

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  post-January Uprising literature
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

„Ze zwykłą sobie głębokością i oryginalnością zdania”. Dictum Cypriana Norwida w krakowskim „Kraju” z 1872 roku

100%
Okulicz-Kozaryn R.
Studia Norwidiana
|
2014
|
vol. 32
175-181
EN
The point of departure for the article are Cyprian Norwid’s words quoted in the Krakow daily “Kraj” in January 1872. They were used in the review of the anonymous poem Niewolnik, in which the emigration poet is shown in the role of an authority deciding about the proper approach to poetical testimonies to struggle for freedom. Norwid’s oral opinion used by the reviewer is concerned with another, also anonymous poem. The reviewer remains anonymous as well. In his analysis of the newspaper publication and of the circumstances accompanying it Okulicz-Kozaryn clarifies these unknown issues: he identifies the authors of both poems as well as of the review, at the same time finding out that Norwid’s words are a different, richer version of the poet’s dictum recorded briefly in another place.
2

„Ze zwykłą sobie głębokością i oryginalnością zdania”. Dictum Cypriana Norwida w krakowskim „Kraju” z 1872 roku

100%
Okulicz-Kozaryn R.
Studia Norwidiana
|
2014
|
vol. 32
175-181
EN
The point of departure for the article are Cyprian Norwid’s words quoted in the Krakow daily “Kraj” in January 1872. They were used in the review of the anonymous poem Niewolnik, in which the emigration poet is shown in the role of an authority deciding about the proper approach to poetical testimonies to struggle for freedom. Norwid’s oral opinion used by the reviewer is concerned with another, also anonymous poem. The reviewer remains anonymous as well. In his analysis of the newspaper publication and of the circumstances accompanying it Okulicz-Kozaryn clarifies these unknown issues: he identifies the authors of both poems as well as of the review, at the same time finding out that Norwid’s words are a different, richer version of the poet’s dictum recorded briefly in another place.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.