Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  power politics
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This paper examines the complex issue of the triangular relationship between China, Taiwan and the United States. Due to its importance to both China and the United States, Taiwan has burdened the relationship between the two powers as long and as fierce as any. China considers Taiwan an integral part of its territory and has been unwilling to reject the use of force to settle the Taiwan issue. Under these conditions, Taiwan has chosen to balance China by aligning itself with the United States in order to avoid submission or destruction. Although the U.S. supports a “one-China” policy, it is strongly opposed to any move that could change the status quo in the Taiwan Strait by force. While both Beijing and Washington often emphasize positive engagement and dialogue, divergent interests of China and the United States over Taiwan, along with their contest for domination in East Asia, have remained a focal point of contention that could send the two powers on a collision course
EN
This article explores the impact of indo-chinese rising in contemporary international relations. China and India have rebuilt diplomatic and economic ties. These two countries will be global powers of the future. This hypothesis has produced a new word ,,Chindia”. The rise of China and India and its impact on international relations and world order will be enormous but it is unacceptable to the United States dominance and to Japan. There are three scenarios to the indo-chinese relations: strategic rivalry, pragmatic management to their economic relationship and strategic political cooperation.
PL
Polityka władzy zawsze była wielką przeszkodą w osiągnięciu sprawiedliwego konsensusu w prawie międzynarodowym. W szczególności podejście realizmu politycznego wywodzące się z potężnych państw często podważa równość i sprawiedliwość w międzynarodowej sferze prawnej. Jednak sądownicza mądrość niektórych wybitnych sędziów w Międzynarodowym Trybunale Sprawiedliwości wykazała niezwykłą śmiałość wobec najtrudniejszej polityki władzy. Ten artykuł ujawnia uniwersalistyczne podejście stosowane przez nieżyjącego już sędziego prawniczego C. G Weeramantry’ego podczas jego kadencji w MTS. W tym artykule szukamy sposobu, w jaki sędzia Weeramantry przedstawił swoje wyroki i opinie doradcze jako prawnik wyłoniony z Globalnego Południa. Artykuł ten oceni wkład wniesiony przez sędziego Weeramantry w złożoną przestrzeń sądową wypełnioną polityką władzy, zarówno z prawnego, jak i filozoficznego punktu widzenia.
EN
The power politics has always been a great obstacle in reaching the just consensus in international law. In particular, the political realist approaches stemming from the powerful states often undermine the equality and justice in international legal sphere. Yet the judicial wisdom of some of the outstanding judges in the International Court of Justice have shown a remarkable audacity against trickiest power politics. This article unveils the universalist approach used by outstanding jurist late judge C. G. Weeramantry during his tenure at ICJ. This article seeks how judge Weeramantry delivered his judgements and advisory opinions as a jurist emerged from the Global South. This paper will assess the contribution made by Judge Weeramantry in a complex judicial space filled with power politics from both legal and philosophical perspectives.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.