Principles have always been the cornerstones of the legal regulation of criminal proceedings affecting all participants of criminal process. Taking into account the accelerated pace of current law enforcement reformation, it is necessary to mention the institution of the prosecution and the key role of the principles of criminal proceedings when presenting the scientific background for further empirical findings. The majority of these principles define the priority directions of growth in the criminal process as well as create a favourable environment for the behavioural aspects of the parties to criminal proceedings. This article provides a comparative analysis of the existing criminal procedural principles of the prosecutor’s role in the criminal proceedings with the specification of the legality principle as a requirement for all subjects of the criminal proceedings, including the prosecutor, to use the norms and provisions of legal acts correctly, to comply with them consistently and to act precisely in accordance with them. It explores the historical origins of these principles and their determinants’ origin starting from the times of Kievan Rus and its unique judicial system and proves that the adversarial principle is closely connected with the dispositivity of the prosecutor’s participation in the criminal proceeding. Emphasis is placed on the correlation between the ‘principles’ and ‘foundations’ terms examined by Ukrainian and Soviet scholars and its application in relation to the newly adopted Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine.
This article presents powers of prosecutors of international criminal tribunals during the pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings. It focuses on such institutions as power to initiate of proceedings and its limitations, preliminary examination of a case, authorization of investigation, conditions of such authorization and powers of the Prosecutor to act on a territory of states. It underlines the independence of the Prosecutor, which is a fundamental element of his status and is protected equally to independence of judges. It presents the conditions on which the Prosecutor can initiate a case – he not only can initiate criminal procedure proprio motu but also chooses situations and perpetrators that should be brought to justice before international tribunals. He should act on the basis of opportunity principle and take actions only in the most severe situations regarding most serious violations of international criminal law when specific circumstances indicate that they are in the interest of an international organ of justice. The article stresses that in the process of creation of international criminal tribunals not only criminal procedure sui generis was designed but also for the first time detailed powers of the Prosecutor had to be adapted to specificity of their functioning. The creators of international criminal tribunals applied legal instruments from several legal systems choosing solutions that seemed most appropriate for organs of international justice. In the consequence such procedure constitutes an amalgamate of common law institutions and solutions used in continental legal systems.
The role of the prosecutor in the legal system is traditionally perceived in the context of performing tasks relating to the prosecution of offences and upholding the rule of law. It is worth mentioning, however, that pursuant to Article 7 sentence 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure the prosecutor may petition to institute proceedings in any civil matter as well as participate in any pending proceedings if he considers his presence necessary to protect the rule of law, citizens’ rights or social interest. While the broad competence range of the prosecutor in civil proceedings has been assessed with high criticism in the literature on numerous occasions, it is with great caution that one should view possible tendencies towards exclusion of the prosecutor as an attendant of proceedings, without affiliation to either party, when the public interest calls for their participation. Especially in the cases where the court notifies the prosecutor of the need to participate in proceedings, one ought to conclude that it is the moment when the principle of effective legal protection becomes most fully realized through equalizing the litigious position of the parties and prevention of the occurrence of a defect which might invalidate the proceedings. The author postulates transforming notification of the need to participate in proceedings served on the prosecutor into summons for attending it.
The aim of the following article is to discuss the issues of the power of the prosecutor to reveal information pertaining to ongoing preparatory proceedings in the light of the new regulations determined by Article 12 of the Act of January 28, 2016, the Law on the Prosecutor’s Office. The aforementioned regulation constitutes an important exception to the general rule of confidentiality of preparatory proceedings, which heavily informs the scope of the analysis. Moreover, the author discusses the relationship between Article 12 of the Law on the Prosecutor’s Office and earlier regulations regarding the revealing of information regarding preparatory proceedings included in the following acts: press law, law on access to public information, personal data protection act, supplemented with relevant regulations of the Criminal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure. In addition, the author discusses the consequences of the analyzed regulation for the interest of the criminal justice system, the interest of the public, as well as the interest of the parties in the proceedings, which has allowed her to assess the justification for that regulation and the necessity of implementing it in Polish legal system.
The development of rhetoric in criminal procedure is reflected in every court trial. The right of the parties to present their final speech before the court (Article 406 of the Pol-ish Code of Criminal Procedure) is important for achieving the required verdict. This paper tries to answer the question about the actual extent to which the said regulation is used by the parties to achieve their objectives. The deliberations are based on an analysis of the results of research conducted by the author.
Opus iustitiae PAX – the properly shaped dimension of justice is a guarantee of peaceful – not based on a conflict and violence – relations between citizens and the state. These words fully reflect the leading thought of this study. It is the concern for a good law and a state governed by the rule of law, which lies at the foundation of actions taken within the scope of legal means by the Prosecutor’s Office that – as the “custodian of law” – is entitled to in the sphere of control over administration. Administrative courts execute justice as a separate part of judicial power. Justice and law are conditions for an effective state, good governance and social peace, which have accompanied us for centuries. Administrative courts uphold the principle of equality before the law, which is regulated by Art. 21, par. 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. Since it is administrative courts which – by performing tasks of control over the activity of public administration – become the guarantee of realization of the above-mentioned principle, their position and range of cognition in the situation of launching administrative-court proceedings by the Prosecutor were presented in the work.
The gloss presents the question of notification of the injured person of the date of hearing in the understanding of Art.387 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The author expresses the opinion that the injured party should be notified by the Court of the date of the hearing and instructed on the possibility of submitting an application to the Court, which is mentioned in § 1 Art. 387 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, along with being sent the notification of the date of the main hearing. The requirement of proper notification of the injured person of the date of the hearing will be realized on condition that this procedural action is executed in compliance with the regulations contained in Chapter 15 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which deals with “Deliveries).
This study is devoted to a criminal case brought before a court in the German Democratic Republic against Gerhard Pchalek in connection with his service as a prosecutor in the Third Reich. Pchalek served in the Polish territories incorporated into the Reich, in Bielsko and Ka¬towice. He was a prosecutor in proceedings before special courts in Bielsko and Katowice, as well as before the Higher National Court in Katowice, in which he filed motions to sentence defendants to the death penalty. In 20 cases - as was determined by the District Court in Gera - Pchalek demanded the death penalty, which was then imposed and enforced. His act was classified as aiding in murder under the provisions of the German Criminal Code, and Pchalek was sentenced to 4 years in strict regime prison. The paper discusses the biography of Pchalek, the issue of post-war criminal liability of Nazi lawyers and the criminal trial before the District Court in Gera. The study uses a historical, formal and dogmatic method. The criminal trial in question is one of the few cases in which a Nazi lawyer was convicted.
The adversarial principle is merely the name of a specific type of organizing process, not a specific Directive of criminal proceedings. The adversarial principle is uniformly recognized as non-codified directive, according to which the criminal process is conducted in the form of equal sides dispute before the impartial court. The adversarial principle in criminal proceedings is something other than adversarial in civil proceedings. The adversarial principle was exposed in the course of work on the revision of the Code of criminal proceedings. The creators of the reform emphasized that Article 167 § 1 of the Code of criminal proceedings differently than it did before, sets out the rules of proof, giving this task in the hands of the parties, leaving only the court admissibility of evidence, and reducing the possibility of taking evidence by the court to exceptional cases justified special circumstances. The creators of the reform emphasized that Article 167 § 1 of the Code of criminal proceedings differently than it did before, sets out the rules of taking of evidence, giving this process to the parties, leaving only the admissibility of evidence to the court, and reducing the possibility of taking evidence by the court to exceptional cases justified by special circumstances. Will be changed the rules for transfer of the court materials from preliminary proceedings. Another important issue is the systematization of the list of evidence, in accordance with the modified Article 333 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and solutions for planning of court hearings. May cause discussions restriction the possibility of taking the initiative of the evidence by the court. The changes enforce proactive stance of the accused, even though he should be able to take advantage of the „right to silence”. Militate against the principle of adversarial problems brought to light on the background of the appeal proceedings. You can express its concern that the adversarial principle in the present approach will detrimental to the presumption of innocence, leading to a model of „proceedings for the rich”. These changes will force to remodel the psyche of judges who feel guilty persons determining cases of dispute run by the parties, not the players involved who have the task of replacing the prosecutor.
The aim of this paper is to present selected problems related to the activity of the District Military Prosecutor’s Office (DMPO) based in Wrocław between 1946 and 1955, and – in particular – its organization, locality and personnel. The activity of the Wrocław-based DMPO has not been the subject of detailed scientific research so far. The paper is a fragment of the author’s doctoral dissertation under the title Wojskowa Prokuratura Rejonowa we Wrocławiu w latach 1946–1955 (The District Military Prosecutor’s Office in Wrocław in the years 1946–1955), defended in 2007 at the Department of Law, Administration and Economy of Wrocław University. The author based her paper on available archival materials such as books of orders of the day, statistical and descriptive reports, as well as personal files of the military personnel. The second part of the work to be published will focus on considerations related to the activity of the DMPO in Wrocław, establishing the goals posed for it to realize and on following the way of their realization.
This article attempts to reconstruct legal regulations concerning the legal status of the prosecutor in proceedings before the State Tribunal. The reconstruction enables the legal nature of this function to be defined, as well as the procedural competences and rules for the appointment and circumstance resulting in the termination of tenure thereof. The analyses carried out concerning the legal nature of the prosecutor’s function lead to the conclusion that in the proceedings before the State Tribunal the prosecutor acts in their own name and thus is not a legal representative of Parliament. However, simultaneously the prosecutor’s function is not independent, as it is supervised by the appointing body. The author states that all the norms included in the Criminal Procedures Code pertaining to the public prosecutor apply thereto. However, the prosecutor must not drop the charges as this remains under the control of Parliament. Analyses on the appointment of the prosecutor allowed for the conclusion that the decision is to be made independently from the charges, whereas the Constitution does not require adopting resolutions with the absolute or qualified majority of votes. In relation to the termination of the prosecutor’s tenure, the author puts forward the thesis that it is possible for the prosecutor to be dismissed by Parliament at any time. The article is rounded off with considerations regarding the evaluation of statutory regulations on the investigated issue.
PL
Celem artykułu jest zrekonstruowanie norm prawnych regulujących status prawny oskarżyciela w postępowaniu przed Trybunałem Stanu, co ma pozwolić na określenie charakteru prawnego tej funkcji, a także jego kompetencji procesowych oraz zasad jego wyboru i okoliczności skutkujących wygaśnięciem jego mandatu. Przeprowadzone analizy dotyczące charakteru prawnego funkcji oskarżyciela prowadzą do sformułowania wniosku, że w postępowaniu przed Trybunałem Stanu działa on we własnym imieniu, a zatem nie jest przedstawicielem procesowym parlamentu. Jednocześnie jednak jego funkcja nie jest samoistna, a organ, który go powołał, sprawuje nad nim ogólną kontrolę. Autor stwierdza, że do oskarżyciela stosuje się co do zasady wszystkie normy Kodeksu postępowania karnego dotyczące oskarżyciela publicznego. Wykluczone jest jednak cofnięcie przez niego oskarżenia, co pozostaje w gestii parlamentu. Analizy dotyczące wyboru oskarżyciela pozwoliły na sformułowanie wniosku, że decyzja w tej sprawie podejmowana jest niezależnie od samego oskarżenia, a Konstytucja nie wymaga podjęcia uchwały w tym zakresie bezwzględną lub kwalifikowaną większością głosów. W odniesieniu do wygaśnięcia funkcji oskarżyciela autor stawia między innymi tezę o możliwości odwołania go w każdym czasie przez parlament. Artykuł wieńczą rozważania dotyczące oceny regulacji ustawowych odnoszących się do badanego zagadnienia.
The paper is devoted to the Ministry of Justice’s law schools. The author presents the origins of the institutions as well as the special nature of the decree of 1946 on exceptional admissions to the office of judge, prosecutor and notary, and entry into the list of barristers and solicitors under the Court System Law of 1928. He discusses the functioning of law schools and their curricula. He demonstrates that the introduction of a special system of appointments to various offices in the justice system in the early days of the People’s Republic of Poland stemmed from a lack of trust on the part of the new authorities in prosecutors and judges of the Second Polish Republic. Consequently, using staff shortages caused by the war and occupation as an excuse, the government decided to try to gain decisive influence on the justice system by appointing graduates of the law schools as judges and prosecutors, in return expecting loyalty to the new political authorities.
DE
Die Bearbeitung wurde den Rechtsschulen des Justizministeriums gewidmet. Präsentiert wurde die Genese der Institution und der besondere Charakter des Dekretes von 1946 über die Sonderzulassung zur Übernahme der Posten als Richter, Staatsanwalt und Notar und zur Eintragung in die Liste der Rechtsanwälte vor dem Hintergrund des Rechts über das System der ordentlichen Gerichte aus dem Jahre 1928. Besprochen wurden die Tätigkeit der Rechtsschulen und ihre Lehrprogramme. Es wurde bewiesen, dass der Sondermodus der Berufung in die Posten im Justizwesen in den Anfängen der Volksrepublik Polen sich aus dem fehlenden Vertrauen der neuen Macht zu den Staatsanwälten und Richtern der Zweiten Polnischen Republik ergab. Infolgedessen, unter dem Vorwand, den Kadermangel zu beseitigen, der durch den Krieg und die Besatzungszeit verursacht wurde, wurde versucht, entscheidenden Einfluss auf die personelle Besetzung der Postem im Justizwesen zu nehmen, indem die richterlichen und staatsanwaltlichen Posten mit Absolventen der Rechtsschulen besetzt wurden. Als Gegendienst erwartete man von ihnen die Loyalität der neuen Macht gegenüber.
In the article the author attempts to describe the role of the psychotherapist within the context of therapy with victims and perpetrators of school violence. Basing his argumentation on two characteristic case studies regarding the behaviour of victims and perpetrators of this kind of violence, the author provides examples of various behaviours, emotions, feelings and reactions experienced by them. Particular attention is given to the analysis of the abuse-related trauma and conflicts and the search for effective copying or preventive strategies. Two case studies are an important part of the article, as they offer a practical illustration of how a therapist can help and support the clients who want to cope with the abuse-related trauma. The analysis of the case studies allows the reader to investigate practical aspects of the search for effective solutions which may help both victims and abusers. The premises examined in the article are well-documented in light of cited research, where detailed descriptions may be found in the extensive overview of relevant subject literature.
The subject of the following article is to discuss the issue of merging the office of the Prosecutor General and the Minister of Justice. This was one of the changes in the grounds of the Law on the Public Prosecutor’s Office of 28 January 2016, which were aimed at strengthening the independence of the public prosecutor’s office and adjusting the solutions to the needs of a modern state. These changes actually led to the weakening of the independence of the prosecution service and prosecutors. The purpose of the article is to show the threat to the rule of law posed by combining the functions of Minister of Justice and Prosecutor General. In opinion of the authors presenting the greater part of this article the statutory regulations concerning legal status before and after the adoption of the new Act of 28 January 2016 is necessary, to demonstrate dangerous changes in the functioning of the prosecutor’s office and dependence on the executive authority
PL
Przedmiotem poniższego artykułu jest omówienie problematyki połączenia urzędu Prokuratora Generalnego i Ministra Sprawiedliwości. Była to jedna ze zmian na gruncie ustawy Prawo o prokuraturze z dnia 28 stycznia 2016 r., które miały na celu wzmocnienie niezależności prokuratury oraz dostosowanie rozwiązań do potrzeb nowoczesnego państwa. Zmiany te tak naprawdę doprowadziły do osłabienia niezależności prokuratury i prokuratorów. Celem artykułu jest ukazanie zagrożenia dla praworządności płynącego z połączenia funkcji Ministra Sprawiedliwości i Prokuratora Generalnego. Poświecenie większej części artykułu regulacjom ustawowym dotyczącym stanu prawnego przed i po uchwaleniu nowej ustawy z dnia 28 stycznia 2016 r. – Prawo o prokuraturze jest konieczne, w ocenie autorek, dla wykazania niebezpiecznych zmian w funkcjonowaniu prokuratury i uzależnienia od władzy wykonawczej.
The article concerns the constitutional position of the Kosovo Prosecutorial Council in the light of the Constitution of 2 April 2008. The author discusses the composition, organization and competences of the Council of Prosecutors. It is a body with a clear anchoring in the Constitution (article 110). The solution adopted with regard to this body means that the Council has the competences concerning the appointment and promotion of prosecutors, their transfer, conducting disciplinary proceedings, as well as the powers related to the functioning of prosecutor’s offices and issuing general guidelines. The mixed composition of the Council does not disqualify it from being an independent body, particularly as the current regulations ensure that prosecutors (elected by other prosecutors) have a majority in its composition.
PL
Artykuł dotyczy pozycji ustrojowej Rady Prokuratury Kosowa w świetle Konstytucji z 2 kwietnia 2008 r. Autor omawia skład, organizację oraz kompetencje Rady Prokuratorów. Jest to organ mający wyraźne zakotwiczenie w Konstytucji (art. 110). Rozwiązania przyjęte wobec tego organu powodują, że Rada dysponuje kompetencjami dotyczącymi powoływania i awansowania prokuratorów, ich przenoszenia, prowadzenia postępowań dyscyplinarnych, a także uprawnieniami związanymi z funkcjonowaniem prokuratur oraz wydawaniem wytycznych o charakterze generalnym. Mieszany skład Rady nie dyskwalifikuje jej jako ciała niezależnego, tym bardziej że obecne uregulowania zapewniają prokuratorom (wybranym przez pozostałych prokuratorów) większość w jej składzie.
Conducting remote trials during the COVID-19 pandemic has become a new reality. In Polish criminal proceedings, under the anti-crisis shield 4.0., it was possible to organise trials by using devices that ensure remote communication. The article concerns a remote trial organised on the basis of the amended article 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The study presents inaccuracies appearing on the basis of regulations, concerning the conduct of a remote trial, as well as the principles of a criminal trial that are limited due to its organisation. The analysis of the topic has led to a conclusion that the amendment of solutions appears to be necessary
PL
Przeprowadzanie zdalnych rozpraw sądowych podczas pandemii COVID-19 stało się nową rzeczywistością. W postępowaniu karnym, mocą tarczy antykryzysowej 4.0., umożliwiono organizowanie rozpraw za pośrednictwem urządzeń zapewniających komunikację na odległość. Artykuł dotyczy zdalnej rozprawy organizowanej na gruncie zmienionego art. 374 Kodeksu postępowania karnego. W opracowaniu zostały przedstawione nieścisłości pojawiające się na gruncie regulacji, dotyczące przebiegu zdalnej rozprawy, jak również zasady procesu karnego doznające ograniczenia na skutek jej organizacji. Analiza tematu doprowadziła do stwierdzenia, że nowelizacja rozwiązań jawi się jako konieczna.
The article attempts to analyse the systemic position of the High Prosecutorial Council in the Albanian constitutional system as shaped by the 2016 constitutional reform. The author of this article analyses the regulations of the Constitution of the Republic of Albania and ordinary legislation that define the place and role of the Prosecutorial Council within the Albanian constitutional system. He focuses on showing the legal status of the Prosecutorial Council, draws attention to its composition and competences, which are decisive for the actual establishment of the guarantees of the independence of the prosecution service in Albania. The solutions adopted lead to the conclusion that it is a specialised body of a mixed nature, whose actions are aimed at guaranteeing the independence of prosecutors.
PL
Artykuł stanowi próbę analizy pozycji ustrojowej Wysokiej Rady Prokuratury w systemie konstytucyjnym Albanii ukształtowanej w wyniku reformy konstytucyjnej z 2016 roku. Autor niniejszego artykułu analizuje regulacje Konstytucji Republiki Albanii i ustawodawstwa zwykłego, które określają miejsce i rolę Rady Prokuratury w ramach albańskiego systemu ustrojowego. Koncentruje się na ukazaniu statusu prawnego rady prokuratury, zwraca uwagę na jej skład i kompetencje, które są decydujące dla faktycznego ustalenia gwarancji niezależności prokuratury w Albanii. Przyjęte rozwiązania prowadzą do wniosku, że jest to organ wyspecjalizowany o charakterze mieszanym, którego działania mają na celu zagwarantowanie niezależności prokuratorom.
The role of the prosecutor in the legal system is traditionally perceived in the context of performing tasks relating to the prosecution of offences and upholding the rule of law. It is worth mentioning, however, that pursuant to Article 7 sentence 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure the prosecutor may petition to institute proceedings in any civil matter as well as participate in any pending proceedings if he considers his presence necessary to protect the rule of law, citizens’ rights or social interest. While the broad competence range of the prosecutor in civil proceedings has been assessed with high criticism in the literature on numerous occasions, it is with great caution that one should view possible tendencies towards exclusion of the prosecutor as an attendant of proceedings, without affiliation to either party, when the public interest calls for their participation. Especially in the cases where the court notifies the prosecutor of the need to participate in proceedings, one ought to conclude that it is the moment when the principle of effective legal protection becomes most fully realized through equalizing the litigious position of the parties and prevention of the occurrence of a defect which might invalidate the proceedings. The author postulates transforming notification of the need to participate in proceedings served on the prosecutor into summoning for attending it.
PL
Tradycyjnie rola prokuratury w systemie prawa postrzegana jest w kontekście wykonywania zadań w zakresie ścigania przestępstw i stania na straży praworządności. Warto jednak wskazać, że zgodnie z art. 7 zd. 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego prokurator może żądać wszczęcia postępowania w każdej sprawie, jak również wziąć udział w każdym toczącym się już postępowaniu, jeżeli według jego oceny wymaga tego ochrona praworządności, praw obywateli lub interesu społecznego Choć szeroki zakres kompetencji prokuratora w sprawach cywilnych spotkał się z niemal powszechną krytyką w literaturze, należy z dużą ostrożnością podchodzić do dążeń do wykluczenia udziału prokuratora jako uczestnika postępowania niezwiązanego z żadną ze stron, gdy za jego udziałem przemawia interes publiczny. Zwłaszcza w przypadkach, w których sąd powiadamia prokuratora o potrzebie wzięcia udziału w postępowaniu, należy uznać, że dochodzi wówczas w najpełniejszy sposób do realizacji zasady efektywnej ochrony prawnej poprzez wyrównanie pozycji procesowej stron i zapobieganie zaistnienia wady nieważności postępowania. Z tego względu autor postuluje przekształcenie zawiadomienia prokuratora o potrzebie jego udziału w postępowaniu w wezwanie do wzięcia w niej udziału.
Przedmiotem artykułu jest przedstawienie roli, jaką pełni prokurator w postępowaniu administracyjnym i sądowoadministracyjnym. Poprzez wykazanie jego uprawnień, autor akcentuje potrzebę zwiększenia liczby prokuratorów w postępowaniu przed organami administracji publicznej oraz sądami administracyjnymi. Ma to na celu wzmocnienie praworządności. Autor poprzez przedstawienie poszczególnych poglądów w orzecznictwie oraz doktrynie, unaocznia korzyści, jakie niesie ze sobą udział prokuratora w postępowaniu. Udział prokuratora w procedurach przed organami administracji publicznej oraz sądami administracyjnymi powinien być podyktowany ochroną praworządności bez względu na interes prawny stron postępowania. Istotny jest także udział Prokuratora Generalnego w kreowaniu orzecznictwa sądów w sprawach z zakresu prawa administracyjnego.
EN
The subject matter of the article is to present the role of the prosecutor in administrative and court-administrative proceedings. By demonstrating his/her rights, the author emphasizes the need to increase the number of prosecutors in proceedings before public administration authorities and administrative courts. This is to strengthen the rule of law. By presenting particular views in case law and doctrine, the author shows the benefits of the prosecutor's participation in the proceedings. The prosecutor's participation in procedures before public administration authorities and administrative courts should be dictated by the protection of the rule of law, regardless of the legal interest of the parties to the proceedings. Attention should be also paid to the participation of the Prosecutor General in the creation of court rulings in administrative law matters.
This scientific article researches the procedure for issuing a European protection order by a Polish court or public prosecutor, resulting in the enforcement of protective, penal, or probation measures by a competent judicial or equivalent authority in a Member State of the European Union. These measures require refraining from staying in certain environments or places and avoiding contact with or proximity to certain people. This article does not cover provisions concerning the execution of such an order by the competent authority of a Member State. The main research objective is to demonstrate the importance of this measure in continuing the protection of the aggrieved in another Member State. The research findings are original and primarily national in scope but also relevant to other countries due to their relation to an EU instrument. This article analyses the essence of the European protection order, its issuance requirements, including the ruling on the aggrieved’s protection measure, necessity of issuing the order, aggrieved’s motion, issuance proceedings, authorised issuing authorities, ruling form, forum for issuance, issuance mode, right to appeal, order transmission, and information obligations. The paper is significant for its in-depth dogmatic analysis and substantial theoretical content and is practical in guiding interpretation of the requirements for the application of this measure and the issuance procedure.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.