Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  psychobiography
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The average length of human life is increasing, which means that older people make more and more numerous group of society. Nowadays there are a lot of different activity offers, addressed to older people, including broadly understood education offers. The Universities of Third Age are obvious example here. However, the lengthening life span means also that the number of seniors diagnosed with dementia is increasing. Older people with dementia can and should be included in geragogics initiatives. At pre-dementive (MCI) and early dementia stages it means above all brain training (ROT). Along with the progress of dementia more holistic intervention should be offered. One of them is the psychobiographic model according to Erwin Böhm. Böhm aims at so-called “reactivation of senior’s spirit”, meaning activating senior’s noopsyche (or cognitive sphere) as well as their thymopsyche (or emotional sphere). Therefore Böhm proposes seven steps scale of interaction (that is seven steps of connecting with senior) which allows to define senior’s needs as well as to enhance their competences. Böhm’s psychobiographic model uses in innovative way the biographical work method, adapting it to the situation of seniors with dementia. Thus the senior is not reduced to their diagnosis but is understood as a person, which means as a bio-psycho-social-spiritual entity.
DE
Der Band enthält die Abstracts ausschließlich in englischer Sprache.
EN
Dominique Fernandez is the author of a method of analysis for artists and their works that he calls “psychobiography”. It establishes parallels between the analysis of works and events in the life of an artist, insisting on the identification of a childhood trauma that left an indelible mark on the style of the artist. In this article we show how he applies this method in his biographical novels: La course à l’abîme, Tribunal d’honneur and Dans la main de l’ange. We analyze the way in which biographemes are reconstituted in order to give a coherent vision of the biographee. We emphasize the thin line that separates reality from fiction, or biography from novel.
FR
Le numéro contient uniquement les résumés en anglais.
RU
Том не содержит аннотаций на английском языке.
EN
The volume Trudny Norwid [Difficult Norwid] marks not only an attempt to create an “impossible monograph” but also an important, large-scale record of the evolution of Norwid Studies in Poland (perhaps it is exactly this and not the other issues addressed in the book that made this interesting perspective particularly accessible). As a result, the collection of texts examined here requires at least two ways of reading and is subject to the same two parallel interpretive paths. One of these was defined by the subject of the entire volume, while the other one is performed involuntarily, in particular in the course of discussing issues that are disputable in the discipline. The author of this review found the second interpretive path as exciting as the first, hence this attempt to synthesise the two interests of the book, if only under the heading of this study – the headword “difficult Norwid in difficult Norwid Studies”.
PL
Tom Trudny Norwid jest nie tylko próbą stworzenia „monografii niemożliwej”, lecz także ważnym, bo przekrojowym dokumentem ewolucji polskiej norwidologii (być może właśnie ta, a nie inna problematyka książki ów interesujący horyzont szczególnie uprzystępniała). Skutkiem tego – analizowany tu zbiór tekstów domaga się niejako dwóch dróg odczytywania i podlega tak samo dwóm równoległym ścieżkom interpretacyjnym. Jedna została wyznaczona przez temat całości tomu, druga realizowana jest mimowolnie, zwłaszcza w toku omawiania dyskusyjnych kwestii w obrębie dyscypliny. Ta druga wydała się autorowi niniejszego omówienia równie pasjonująca, co pierwsza. Stąd też jego próba syntetycznego połączenia obu interesów tej książki, choćby w ramach podtytułu niniejszego studium – hasła „trudnego Norwida trudnej norwidologii”.
EN
The volume Trudny Norwid [Difficult Norwid] marks not only an attempt to create an “impossible monograph” but also an important, large-scale record of the evolution of Norwid Studies in Poland (perhaps it is exactly this and not the other issues addressed in the book that made this interesting perspective particularly accessible). As a result, the collection of texts examined here requires at least two ways of reading and is subject to the same two parallel interpretive paths. One of these was defined by the subject of the entire volume, while the other one is performed involuntarily, in particular in the course of discussing issues that are disputable in the discipline. The author of this review found the second interpretive path as exciting as the first, hence this attempt to synthesise the two interests of the book, if only under the heading of this study – the headword “difficult Norwid in difficult Norwid Studies”.
PL
Tom Trudny Norwid jest nie tylko próbą stworzenia „monografii niemożliwej”, lecz także ważnym, bo przekrojowym dokumentem ewolucji polskiej norwidologii (być może właśnie ta, a nie inna problematyka książki ów interesujący horyzont szczególnie uprzystępniała). Skutkiem tego – analizowany tu zbiór tekstów domaga się niejako dwóch dróg odczytywania i podlega tak samo dwóm równoległym ścieżkom interpretacyjnym. Jedna została wyznaczona przez temat całości tomu, druga realizowana jest mimowolnie, zwłaszcza w toku omawiania dyskusyjnych kwestii w obrębie dyscypliny. Ta druga wydała się autorowi niniejszego omówienia równie pasjonująca, co pierwsza. Stąd też jego próba syntetycznego połączenia obu interesów tej książki, choćby w ramach podtytułu niniejszego studium – hasła „trudnego Norwida trudnej norwidologii”.
EN
The volume Trudny Norwid [Difficult Norwid] marks not only an attempt to create an “impossible monograph” but also an important, large-scale record of the evolution of Norwid Studies in Poland (perhaps it is exactly this and not the other issues addressed in the book that made this interesting perspective particularly accessible). As a result, the collection of texts examined here requires at least two ways of reading and is subject to the same two parallel interpretive paths. One of these was defined by the subject of the entire volume, while the other one is performed involuntarily, in particular in the course of discussing issues that are disputable in the discipline. The author of this review found the second interpretive path as exciting as the first, hence this attempt to synthesise the two interests of the book, if only under the heading of this study – the headword “difficult Norwid in difficult Norwid Studies”.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.