Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  psychometric measurement
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Forum Oświatowe
|
2014
|
vol. 26
|
issue 2(52)
29-46
EN
The article elaborates on the construct of emotional intelligence, wherein it focuses on both-explaining the causes of the enormous popularity of this concept and outlining the major issues and concerns associated with it. Presenting the basic assumptions of the ability model by Salovey and Mayer and the most popular mixed models (Goleman’s and Bar-On’s) has pointed out the huge differences in the adopted definitions and a proposed structure of emotional intelligence. The advantages and short comings of these models were described too. The article has also highlighted the problems associated with the measurement of emotional intelligence, as well as insufficient knowledge of its circumstances and dynamics of development. The reflection on the functional importance of emotional intelligence is a significant part of the article, which also attempted to confront popularizers’ claims with available empirical data.
PL
W artykule podjęto rozważania nad konstruktem inteligencji emocjonalnej, przy czym skoncentrowano się w nim zarówno na wyjaśnieniu przyczyn ogromnej popularności tego pojęcia, jak również nakreśleniu głównych problemów i wątpliwości z nim związanych. Przedstawiając podstawowe założenia modelu zdolnościowego Saloveya i Mayera oraz najpopularniejszych modeli mieszanych (autorstwa Golemana oraz Bar-Ona), wskazano na ogromne rozbieżności w przyjmowanych w ich ramach definicjach i postulowanej strukturze inteligencji emocjonalnej. Opisano również zalety oraz niedoskonałości wspomnianych modeli. Zwrócono uwagę na problemy związane z pomiarem inteligencji emocjonalnej, a także niewystarczającą wiedzę o jej uwarunkowaniach i dynamice rozwojowej. Znaczącą część artykułu stanowią rozważanianad funkcjonalnym znaczeniem inteligencji emocjonalnej, w których podjęto próbę konfrontacji tez popularyzatorów pojęcia z dostępnymi danymi empirycznymi.
EN
The study described in the present paper aimed to account for all the three dimensions of learners’ strategic self-regulation, i.e. cognitive, affective, and sociocultural-interactive language learning strategies (LLS) (Oxford 2011), and attempted to explore their relationships with learners’ personality and other individual variables, such as gender, type of university and area of studies, or the level of proficiency in English. The participants of the study, who formed a representative sample of BA/BS students of AMU and WSB University (722 students in total), completed two questionnaires, a Polish adaptation of SILL ver. 7.0 (Oxford 1990), and the adaptation of NEO-FFI recommended by the Polish Association of Psychology (Zawadzki et al. 2010) for research. The goodness criteria for psychometric research tools (Hornowska 2007) were analysed for both questionnaires. The obtained results confirm the role of most of the above-mentioned individual characteristics in strategy choice, validate the importance of learners’ personality in language learning, and provide evidence of the significance of openness to experience in learning a foreign language.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.