Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  reciever
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
Zeszyty Prasoznawcze
|
2012
|
vol. 55
|
issue 3
98-116
EN
Since the publication of "Świat nieprzedstawiony” by J. A. Kornhauser and A. Zagajewski in 1974, its name started to be considered in the Polish language as a synonym of manipulation of news, messages in order to achieve the goal assumptioned by the sender. This method was mastered to perfection by the Catholic newspaper “Nasz Dziennik”, which is a part of the Polish Conglomerate of Redemptorists. Journalists often use the element of fear. It happens that only in one edition there are articles with titles such as “There was no money or good will”, "Ossolineum on the brink of bankruptcy”, "Gas – unsolved problem still”, "People’s veto to Minister Hall”, "Too much coal formation”, “Rostowski will explain himself”, “Restore the right balance”, “School is not a square for elections”, “Mines and plants at the stalemate”, “We won’t give the schools back”, “Someone neglected his duties”, “Researches on human embryos don’t make any sense” or “Pyongyang ignored the ban”. The main topics which are presented as attacks or misfortunes are: attacks of the civil authorities on the Church, the loss of Polish culture, Christianity, the decline of democracy in Poland, Polish enemies grow stronger and obviously Smolensk Distaster. It is difficult to determine how great impact on readers was caused by years of frightening them. Additionally, “Nasz Dziennik” has never published its editions as well as never signed any suitable commitments, which makes it hard to honestly examine the issue of scaring readers. Therefore, the only way to investigate the effectiveness of this medium is to observe how politicians strive for its support.
EN
In the present paper it is stated that Historya domowa... was written by six authors, of whom five have been differentiated on the basis of graphy and one on the basis of the usage of the first and the third persons of singular forms. It has been established that they were writing in ther own name as well as in the name of the groups they represented (i.e. the inhabitants of the convent and other people connected with it). The authors of the utterances (the use of indirect, semidirect and direct speech) are also discussed. The text was addressed to the authors themselves (like in the case of diaries) their successors, and the majority of the text was intended for the internal use of the convent and was to be read quickly and in fragments, not in its full form.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.