Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  recognition and enforcement
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2019–2020) – rozporządzenie nr 44/2001 i rozporządzenie nr 1215/2012

100%
Gołąb A., Weitz K., Wołodkiewicz B.
Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego
|
2021
|
vol. 30
|
issue 3
519-605
EN
Over the past two years the Court of Justice of the EU has delivered several important judgments on legal instruments forming the framework of the so-called judicial cooperation in civil matters. Therefore, international civil procedure law remains one of the most vigorous areas of European integration. The two-part article contains a detailed and comprehensive study of the ECJ’s acquis within the framework of basic legal instruments underpinning the EU Common Judicial Area, including all “Brussels” Regulations, the Insolvency Regulation (No 1346/2000), the Succession Regulation (No 650/2012), the Small Claims Regulation (No 861/2007), etc. The authors pay close attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union; they are endeavouring not only to analyse the technical matters raised by the respective cases pending before the Court of Justice, but also to highlight the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects.
2

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2017–2018) — rozporządzenia nr 2201/2003, nr 4/2009, nr 805/2004, nr 1896/2006, nr 861/2007, nr 650/2012, nr 1346/2000 i nr 1393/2007

100%
Rylski, P., Weitz K., Wołodkiewicz B.
Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego
|
2019
|
vol. 28
|
issue 4
941-1014
EN
Over the past two years the Court of Justice of the EU has delivered several important judgments on legal instruments forming the framework of the so-called judicial cooperation in civil matters. Therefore, international civil procedure law remains one of the most vigorous areas of the European integration. The two-part article contains a detailed and comprehensive study of the ECJ’s acquis within the framework of basic legal instruments underpinning the EU Common Judicial Area, including all “Brussels” Regulations, the Insolvency Regulation (No 1346/2000), the Succession Regulation (No 650/2012), the Small Claims Regulation (No 861/2007), etc. The authors pay close attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union; they try not only to analyse the technical matters raised by the respective cases pending before the Court of Justice, but also to highlight the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects.
3

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2017–2018) – rozporządzenie nr 44/2001 i rozporządzenie nr 1215/2012

100%
Rylski P., Weitz K., Wołodkiewicz B.
Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego
|
2019
|
vol. 28
|
issue 3
705-799
EN
Over the past two years the Court of Justice of the EU has delivered several important judgments on legal instruments forming the framework of the so-called judicial cooperation in civil matters. Therefore, international civil procedure law remains one of the most vigorous areas of European integration. The two-part article contains a detailed and comprehensive study of the ECJ’s acquis within the framework of basic legal instruments underpinning the EU Common Judicial Area, including all “Brussels” Regulations, the Insolvency Regulation (No 1346/2000), the Succession Regulation (No 650/2012), the Small Claims Regulation (No 861/2007), etc. The authors pay close attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union; they are endeavouring not only to analyse the technical matters raised by the respective cases pending before the Court of Justice, but also to highlight the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.