Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  registered partnership
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The purpose of the paper is to analyze the issue of the division of the joint property of spouses in the scope of individual components of this joint property – partnership rights due to participation in a registered partnership and shares in a limited liability company. While many studies have been written on the subject of partnership rights belonging to the property of spouses, the issue of the division of the spouses’ property including these rights is only beginning to appear in deliberations of few authors. An independent interpretation of the law as well as an analysis and critical look at the literature were adopted as the basic research method. The subject of the research involves a registered partnership (as a model partnership) and a limited liability company (because in many places regulations concerning a limited liability company and a joint-stock company are similar). Although the issues of the division of the joint property of spouses are regulated by the provisions of the Family and Guardianship Code (Articles 45 and 46 FGC) and the Civil Code, one can find norms concerning the operation of companies and partnerships (Article 1 § 1 CCC) which modify general principles regarding the manner of division of joint property and are applied as a special rule. The civil division of a partnership share in a registered partnership (Article 62 CCC) and the division in kind of a single share in a capital company (Article 333 § 1 CCC) are not possible. It is the my belief – although I am aware that this is a controversial thesis – that it is possible to divide a partnership share in a general partnership. Restrictions on the method of the division are provided for in Articles 10, 1831, 3321 CCC, which, in my opinion, apply to the division of the joint property of spouses.
2
Content available remote

Registrované partnerství a homoparentalita v Česku

75%
EN
This paper introduces a unique and comprehensive sociological analysis of same-sex partnerships in the Czech Republic, especially in the legally recognised (though limited) form of civil unions (registered partnerships – RP). The analysis combines multiple data sources and methodological approaches, drawing on administrative data from the Ministry of Internal Affairs (n=2710), secondary quantitative data from the Czech Statistical Office and Public Opinion Research Centre/CVVM, and original quantitative (n=882) and qualitative (n=48) data. Focusing on the heteronormative framing of the issue, two main aspects come to the forefront: gender and LGBT parenting. Data show that there has been a small but steadily growing amount of interest in RP, especially among women, in the last six years. However, RP remains very selective and quite ‘unpopular’. Although there has been a weakening of the procreative function of marriage, the role of RP in this respect is less clear-cut. On the one hand, it makes some paths to becoming a parent more difficult, while on the other, for some people, it provides a certain symbolic security for their existing family. The article also explores other gender and age characteristics and differences or similarities to marriage.
EN
Institution of termination of the articles of registered partnership by one of two partners in context of overtaking of assets on the basis of Article 66 of Commercial Companies Code deals with issues of partnerships. The analysis of special kind of lawsuit, aiming at taking over the assets of the partnership by one of the partners with the obligation to settle with the withdrawing partner, leaves no doubt that many relevant aspects have not been decided de lege lata. Practice of business transactions shows that it is necessary to present de lege ferenda postulates.
PL
Celem pracy jest dokonanie analizy zagadnienia podziału majątku wspólnego małżonków w zakresie szczególnych składników majątku wspólnego – praw spółkowych przysługujących z tytułu uczestnictwa w spółce jawnej oraz udziałów w spółce z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością. O ile bowiem powstało wiele prac na temat przynależności praw spółkowych do majątków małżonków, to kwestia podziału majątku małżonków obejmującego te prawa dopiero zaczyna pojawiać się w rozważaniach nielicznych autorów. Jako podstawową metodę badań przyjąłem samodzielną wykładnię prawa oraz analizę i krytykę piśmiennictwa. Przedmiotem badań uczyniłem zaś spółkę jawną (jako modelową spółkę osobową) i spółkę z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością (gdyż w wielu miejscach regulacje dotyczące spółki z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością i spółki akcyjnej są podobne). Chociaż kwestie podziału majątku wspólnego małżonków regulowane są przez przepisy k.r.o. (art. 45 i 46 k.r.o.) i k.c., to jednak można znaleźć normy dotyczące funkcjonowania spółek (art. 1 § 1 k.s.h.), modyfikujące ogólne zasady dotyczące sposobu podziału majątku wspólnego i stosowane na zasadzie przepisu szczególnego. Wykluczony jest podział cywilny udziału spółkowego w spółce jawnej (art. 62 k.s.h.) oraz podział w naturze pojedynczej akcji (art. 333 § 1 k.s.h.). Uważam – choć mam świadomość, że jest to teza kontrowersyjna – że można dokonać podziału udziału spółkowego w spółce jawnej. Ograniczenia co do sposobu podziału przewidują artykuły 10, 1831, 3321 k.s.h., które, moim zdaniem, mają zastosowanie przy podziale majątku wspólnego małżonków.
EN
The purpose of the paper is to analyze the issue of the division of the joint property of spouses in the scope of individual components of this joint property – partnership rights due to participation in a registered partnership and shares in a limited liability company. While many studies have been written on the subject of partnership rights belonging to the property of spouses, the issue of the division of the spouses’ property including these rights is only beginning to appear in deliberations of few authors. An independent interpretation of the law as well as an analysis and critical look at the literature were adopted as the basic research method. The subject of the research involves a registered partnership (as a model partnership) and a limited liability company (because in many places regulations concerning a limited liability company and a jointstock company are similar). Although the issues of the division of the joint property of spouses are regulated by the provisions of the Family and Guardianship Code (Articles 45 and 46 FGC) and the Civil Code, one can find norms concerning the operation of companies and partnerships (Article 1 § 1 CCC) which modify general principles regarding the manner of division of joint property and are applied as a special rule. The civil division of a partnership share in a registered partnership (Article 62 CCC) and the division in kind of a single share in a capital company (Article 333 § 1 CCC) are not possible. It is the my belief – although I am aware that this is a controversial thesis – that it is possible to divide a partnership share in a general partnership. Restrictions on the method of the division are provided for in Articles 10, 1831, 3321 CCC, which, in my opinion, apply to the division of the joint property of spouses.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.