Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  resumption of proceedings
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Wznowienie postępowania w polskim prawie procesowym cywilnym w latach 1933–1939

100%
Krygier G.
Prawo
|
2015
|
issue 319
195 - 209
XX
The validity of court rulings was extremely important to the judiciary. It served to uphold the authority of court rulings, the legal order and the interests of the state. However, when a ruling turned out to be obviously wrong and unjust, there had to be a possibility for the proceedings to be resumed and end with a valid ruling. In 1918–1933 the binding civil procedure in Poland was that of the partitioning powers. The German, Austrian and Russian procedures provided for a possibility of proceedings to be resumed, but resolved the issue in a variety of ways. The members of the Codification Commission faced the difficult task of creating a uniform instrument of resumptionof proceedings. The author of the present article discusses the problems facing both the authors of the 1930 Code of Civil Procedure as well as people who subsequently applied the provisions of the code in practice.
2
Content available remote

Glosa do wyroku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z 11 grudnia 2019 r., sygn. akt P 13/18

86%
Parchomiuk J.
Przegląd Sejmowy
|
2020
|
issue 5(160)
201-219
EN
The commented judgment concerns the assessment of the compliance with the Polish Constitution of the provisions regulating the effects of removal of the entities entered in the former commercial registers which have not been entered to the new National Court Register. The property of these entities was taken over for the benefit of the State Treasury, and the rights of partners, cooperative members and other persons to a share in the liquidation of assets expired upon the removal of the entity from the register. The Tribunal did not question the mechanism of the arrangement of the ownership relations of the entities removed from the register. Nevertheless, the Tribunal considered that the legislator’s solution to this problem was not entirely correct, as it did not pass the proportionality test in respect of claims against this property of former company partners or cooperative members. The author agrees in principle with the Tribunal’s position, but in his commentary he raises polemical remarks about certain arguments cited in the justification of the judgment. In addition, the author points out that it is worth supplementing the Tribunal’s argumentation with certain threads that were omitted by the Tribunal for formal and legal reasons.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.