Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  reviewers
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Reviewers for Volume 4/2014

100%
.
Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching
|
2014
|
vol. 4
|
issue 4
725-726
EN
.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Kolegium Recenzentów 2020

84%
Kwiatkowski M.
Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia de Cultura
|
2020
|
vol. 12
|
issue 1
171-171
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Kolegium Recenzentów 2020

84%
Kosek J.
Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia de Cultura
|
2020
|
vol. 12
|
issue 2
172-172
4
Content available remote

Recenzenti u ovom godištu

67%
Libri & Liberi
|
2013
|
vol. Vol 2
|
issue No. 2
409-410
HR
Popis recenzenata u drugom godištu izdavanja časopisa Libri et Liberi.
EN
A list of reviewers in the second volume of Libri et Liberi.
5
Content available remote

Počátky české literární kritiky v době osvícenské

51%
Dobiáš D., Smyčka V.
Česká literatura (Czech Literature)
|
2018
|
vol. 66
|
issue 1
3-33
EN
This study deals with Enlightenment literary criticism in the Czech lands within the broad context of Central European literatures and criticism at that time. The authors previous conceptions of literary criticism and present a relational model of literary criticism, which considers criticism as a form of negotiation between critics, authors and the public, i.e. within the coordinates of aesthetics, the canon and the public. At any particular time their relationship always creates the current form of the critical field in which it is legitimate (or not) to make critical judgements about literature. As opposed to the older scholarly discipline, the more recent Enlightenment criticism bases its authority on the indefinite nature of its judgements, the processual and periodical nature of its communications and thus on the newly established scholarly, social and literary journals and reviews. The second part of the study focuses on the development of journals and their characteristic critical debates in the 1770s-1790s, as well as the ongoing development of literary criticism written in Czech at the turn of the 18th and the 19th centuries. The conclusion of the text focuses on and analyses criticism through the eyes of the epoch. It also shows how criticism gradually established itself as a form of communication that helped to create the key literary institutions in spite of the ongoing reservations of writers and the public.
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

List of Reviewers

34%
Legilinguistics C.
Comparative Legilinguistics
|
2016
|
vol. 28
120-120
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.