Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  risk profile
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The process of higher education modernization gives rise to a great deal of risks the higher education institutions face. This risk management policy forms part of the internal control and corporate governance arrangements of the UK universities which try to follow and adopt best practice in the identification, evaluation and control of risks to ensure that, as far as is reasonably practical, risks are eliminated or reduced to an acceptable level.Despite the fact that risks exist in the higher education system and can never be eliminated, administration and staff of the Ukrainian universities are unaware of the nature of risk and the types of risks associated with their area of work. Although many studies have attempted to explore the risk management implementation in higher education, there is a sparse conceptual framework in this sphere. The author of this article focuses on the framework of categories and concepts, associated with the coverage of the issues of therisk management implementation in higher education institutionson the basis of such theoretical methods as a method of terminological analysis, comparison, synthesis, generalization. The comparative analysis of suchkey definitions as «risk», «risk management», «risk profile», «risk owner»is madeon the basis of native and foreign scientific sources, definition and specialized dictionaries, the UK regulatory documents in the risk management sphere. It has been revealed that the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) defines risk as «the threat or possibility that an action or event will adversely or beneficiallyaffect an organization’s ability to achieve its objectives». Risk management is characterized by it as «a process which can provide assurance that damaging things will not happen or are less likely tohappen; that beneficial things will be or are more likely to be achieved». The author has proposed her own definition of risk managementin higher education which is as follows: it is a structured and coherent approach that combines strategy, processes, people, technologies and skills to identify, assess and control the uncertainties which may impact the university’s ability to achieve its objectives and missiontoprovideeducationalservices.An attempt to clarify the common terminology of pedagogical riskology that will enhance the level of knowledge of staff and administration of higher education institutions is made. The further research should focus on the analysis of the leading concepts of risk management in the Ukrainian and foreign theory of education.
PL
Zakłady ubezpieczeń mają obowiązek wdrożenia tzw. zasady ostrożnego inwestora oraz niezbędnych procedur i procesów w tym obszarze. Obowiązek ten powstał z dniem 1 stycznia 2016 r., czyli wraz z implementowaniem dyrektywy Wypłacalność II do polskiego porządku prawnego. Wskazówki dotyczące tych zasad znajdują się przepisach ustawy o działalności ubezpieczeniowej i reasekuracyjnej, a także w treści rozporządzenia delegowanego (EU) 2015/35 i Wytycznych EIOPA. W niniejszym artykule zostaną przedstawione nowe regulacje prawne dotyczące zakładów ubezpieczeń w odniesieniu do działalności inwestycyjnej w związku z wejściem w życie reżimu Wypłacalność II wraz z elementami sprawozdawczymi dla tego obszaru.
EN
Insurance companies are obliged to implement the so-called prudent investor rule and necessary procedures and processes in this area. This obligation was established on 1 January 2016, with the implementation of the Solvency II Directive into Polish law. The guidance on these rules are covered by the provisions of the Act on Insurance and Reinsurance Activity, as well as the content of the EIOPA Delegated Regulation and Guidelines. In this article the new regulations imposed on insurance companies will be presented in terms of investment activity in connection with the entry into force of the Solvency II regime with relevant reporting elements.
RU
В статье обсуждается проблема влияния эмоционального состояния на количественный профиль риска. Риск как понятие усиливает два эквивалентных измерения. Первое измерение связано с экспертной оценкой рисков. Второй связан с общественным восприятием риска и называется возмущением. Возмущение можно понимать как эмоциональное состояние по отношению к риску. Описаны пять различных степеней опасных ситуаций и проанализировано эмоциональное отношение населения к ним с помощью структурированного интервью. Для описания усиления риска эмоциональным состоянием рассчитывается корреляция между эмоциональным настроем и готовностью к действию. Затем строится профиль риска.
EN
In the article the problem how an emotional state influences quantitative risk profile is discussed. Risk as a concept enhances two equivalent dimensions. The first dimension relates to experts’ risk assessment. The second one is related to public risk perception, named outrage. One can understand outrage as the emotional state concerning risk. Five different degrees of hazardous situations are described and public emotional attitude towards them is analyzed by structured interview. A correlation between the emotional attitude and readiness to act is calculated to describe amplification of risk by the emotional state. Then a risk profile is constructed.
EN
Legal framework is a core element of every public activity. Customs affairs are not an excep-tion. Main source of customs regulation in Ukraine is a Customs Code adopted in 2012. Ac-cording to article 320 of Ukrainian Customs Code forms and scope of control, sufficient to ensure that the customs legislation and international treaties of Ukraine are observed at the time of customs clearance, shall be selected by the customs offices (customs stations) on the basis of the risk management system. Thus, proper functioning of risk management system is a crucial thing for selective customs control. Aim of this article is to describe legal basis for customs risk management system application and to find out if there are any gaps in customs legislation, which prevent form its full-fledged functioning and use. So apart of customs risk management legislation, some general provisions are to be analyzed further.
PL
Ramy prawne są podstawowym elementem każdej działalności publicznej, a sprawy celne każdego państwa nie stanowią wyjątku. Głównym źródłem prawnych regulacji celnych na Ukrainie jest Kodeks Celny przyjęty w 2012 r., który zgodnie z art 320, stanowi zakres i cel przestrzegania przepisów celnych i międzynarodowych traktatów Ukrainy w czasie odprawy celnej. Natomiast urzędy celne (stacje celne) wybierane są na podstawie systemu zarządzania ryzykiem. Dlatego prawidłowe funkcjonowanie systemu zarządzania ryzykiem jest kluczowe dla selektywnej kontroli celnej. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest opisanie podstawy prawnej dla zastosowania systemu zarządzania ryzykiem celnym oraz sprawdzenie, czy istnieją jakiekol-wiek luki w przepisach celnych, które uniemożliwiają pełne funkcjonowanie i wykorzystanie systemu celnego na Ukrainie. Autorzy wskazują, ze oprócz prawodawstwa w zakresie zarzą-dzania ryzykiem celnym, niektóre ogólne przepisy w tym zakresie należy poddać dalszej analizie.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.