Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  ruah
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Dawca Ducha Bożego w Nowym Testamencie

100%
Ordon H.
The Biblical Annals
|
1996
|
vol. 43
|
issue 1
127-137
PL
Die Aussagen des AT in bezug auf den Geist lassen erkennen, daß Er ganz Gott gehört, von Ihm herkommt und nur von Ihm gegeben werden kann. Diese Auffassung wurde vom NT übernommen und fand dort ihren festen Platz. Von manchen Lukas − und Johannestexten (Lk 24, 49; Apg 1, 3-8; 2, 33; Joh 15, 26; 16, 7; 20, 19-23) ist es jedoch zu erfahren, daß selber Jesus den Hl. Geist geben wird und Ihn später tatsächlich sendet. Besonders bemerkenswert sind in dieser Hinsicht die Paraklet − Sprüche im Johannesevangelium, wo bald der Vater, bald Jesus als Geber desselben Parakleten erscheinen. Das bisher nur Gott zugehörige Vorrecht wird Ihm zuteil. Es ist noch zu unterstreichen, daß alle diese Aussagen im Zusammenhang der Auferstehung des Herrn vorkommen. Die Ausarbeitung solcher Meinung bleibt mit der Entwicklung der Christologie eng verbunden. Erst als sich die Urkirche im vollem Umfang dieser Tatsache bewußt wurde, daß Jesus Gott ist und in allem dem Vater gleich, konnte sie die Relation des Herrn zum Hl. Geist besser verstehen und ins rechte Licht stellen. Denn nur Gott hat die Vollmacht, den Geist zu senden. Weil es vor allem aufgrund der Auferstehung Jesu möglich war, sein Gottsein und seinen einzigartigen Geistbesitz zu erkennen, bleiben die Aussagen des Lukas und des Johannes mit dem Osterereigniss verknüpft.
2
Content available remote

Interpretacja terminu „psyche” w Piśmie Świętym i w teologii

71%
Liszka P.
Teologia w Polsce
|
2013
|
issue 2
45-61
PL
Wśród terminów antropologicznych psyche zajmuje miejsce szczególne. Po odejściu od metafizyki, w sytuacji zorganizowanego wyciszania refleksji chrześcijańskich, w powszechnej świadomości, a nawet w naukach humanistycznych (psychologia) pozostaje termin psyche, aczkolwiek już bez aspektu transcendentnego. Przedmiotem niniejszego artykułu jest słowo psyche, odpowiadająca mu rzeczywistość służy jedynie do wyjaśnienia sensu tego słowa. Refleksja nad rzeczywistością, która wymaga doboru zestawu nazw, aby można było o niej mówić, stanowi temat odrębnego opracowania. W każdym razie słowo samo w sobie jest umowne, neutralne, nie wskazuje na jakiś konkret w sposób automatyczny
EN
Among anthropological terms, the term psyche occupies a special place. After the movement away from metaphysics, in the situation of the organized drowning of Christian reflection, in the general awareness , and even in the humanities (psychology) remains the term psyche, although with no transcendental aspect any more. The object of this paper is the word, while the reality serves only to explain its sense. Another thing is a reflection on the reality, which requires the selection of a set of names, in order to be able to speak about it. A word in itself is conventional, neutral, it does not point to a concrete thing automatically.In the history of the human thought this term has played an important role, has been the object of multiple reflections and has served to express essential truths linked to the ontic structure of the human being and to its existence. Its semantic field used to be identified on one hand with the meaning scope of the terms corresponding to it in other languages as well s of other terms in the same language. A historical analysis, which in a paper can be only sketchy and general, permits to notice that a mingling thinking is not consistent with the actual state of affairs. We are facing a semantic richness, an isolation of characteristic features of individual terms. Each term has its own stem as well as nearer and further peripheries which to a smaller or higher degree have a common part with the neighborhood of the stem of the other terms. This is how the situation with the semantic field of the term psyche is.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Interpretacja terminu "psyche" w Piśmie Świętym i w teologii

67%
Liszka P.
Teologia w Polsce
|
2013
|
vol. 7
|
issue 2
45-61
EN
Among anthropological terms, the term psyche occupies a special place. After the movement away from metaphysics, in the situation of the organized drowning of Christian reflection, in the general awareness , and even in the humanities (psychology) remains the term psyche, although with no transcendental aspect any more. The object of this paper is the word, while the reality serves only to explain its sense. Another thing is a reflection on the reality, which requires the selection of a set of names, in order to be able to speak about it. A word in itself is conventional, neutral, it does not point to a concrete thing automatically. In the history of the human thought this term has played an important role, has been the object of multiple reflections and has served to express essential truths linked to the ontic structure of the human being and to its existence. Its semantic field used to be identified on one hand with the meaning scope of the terms corresponding to it in other languages as well s of other terms in the same language. A historical analysis, which in a paper can be only sketchy and general, permits to notice that a mingling thinking is not consistent with the actual state of affairs. We are facing a semantic richness, an isolation of characteristic features of individual terms. Each term has its own stem as well as nearer and further peripheries which to a smaller or higher degree have a common part with the neighborhood of the stem of the other terms. This is how the situation with the semantic field of the term psyche is.
PL
Wśród terminów antropologicznych psyche zajmuje miejsce szczególne. Po odejściu od metafizyki, w sytuacji zorganizowanego wyciszania refleksji chrześcijańskich, w powszechnej świadomości, a nawet w naukach humanistycznych (psychologia) pozostaje termin psyche, aczkolwiek już bez aspektu transcendentnego. Przedmiotem niniejszego artykułu jest słowo psyche, odpowiadająca mu rzeczywistość służy jedynie do wyjaśnienia sensu tego słowa. Refleksja nad rzeczywistością, która wymaga doboru zestawu nazw, aby można było o niej mówić, stanowi temat odrębnego opracowania. W każdym razie słowo samo w sobie jest umowne, neutralne, nie wskazuje na jakiś konkret w sposób automatyczny.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Ruling the rûaḥ: Emotional Experience and Expression in Ancient Hebrew

60%
Atwood J.
The Biblical Annals
|
2022
|
vol. 12
|
issue 3
333-352
EN
Emotions are one of the most fascinating and difficult aspects of human experience, and have received significant attention in biblical studies. This paper explores how one Hebrew lexeme, rûaḥ, provides a point of entry into the complex world of how emotions are expressed in ancient texts. Drawing from some insights of Cognitive Linguistics, it examines the use of rûaḥ to express the experience of impatience and patience, and arrogance and humility. This paper then challenges a long-held but simplistic equation of rûaḥ with anger, and argues that a more nuanced and complex relationship exists between lexeme and emotion than most citations in scholarship suggest.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.