Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  rzeźba XX i XXI wieku
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The paper discusses the issue of artistic attitudes towards traditional materials in the era of crucial changes the sculpture medium has witnessed from the beginning of the 20th century. This problem is presented on the example of alabaster: material, which has been artistically used since antiquity. Its natural properties, as well as its relationship with other important materials (e. g. marble), became a starting point for the creation of certain cultural notions and symbolic associations attached to alabaster in the course of time. The question: if and how alabaster functions in modern sculpture arose from the long-term occupation of the author with the early modern alabaster sculpture and its symbolics. In the first part of the paper the summary of this research has been presented: next to sculptural properties (relative softness, translucency) and short overview of the typical genres where alabaster was applied (small-scale sculpture, relief, tomb sculpture, vessels, lamps), the main currents of opinion surrounding the material have been summarized (alabaster as a symbol of chastity, evangelical symbol of the human body of Christ, attribute of female body). From this perspective selected examples of the alabaster usage by important figures of modern sculpture have been discussed. The first part of the essay concerns the development in the 1st half of the 20th century, when alabaster found appreciation among the followers of the direct carving movement. The alabaster works of Henri Gaudier-Brzeska, Henry Moore, Barbara Hepworth, John Skeaping and Jacob Epstein have been analysed in order to find out how these ‘progressive’ sculptors dealt with the material, which - especially in Great Britain - was loaded with tradition. The discussed examples show a wide range of attitudes: from the dialogue with traditional meanings (translucency and reaction on light as the sign of transcendence) to the exploration of entirely new potentials (alabaster as primal matter loaded with natural power of rocks and atavistic instincts).
EN
The text makes up the second part of the paper presented in the previous issue of ‘Quart’ quarterly. While there the usage of alabaster in the sculpture of the 1st half of the 20th century has been demonstrated, in the current issue the development in the following decades of the 20th century as well as of the early 21st century has been sketched. In the opening part of the paper it has been emphasised that in the time when countless new materials have been introduced into the fine arts and the borders between art genres became vague, alabaster was even more marginalised. Although it did not disappear for good, it had to compete with synthetic materials as polyester, in which comparable effects could have been achieved but they had advantage over traditional materials as they were easier to work with and cheaper. The case of the late oeuvre of the Polish sculptress Alina Szapocznikow (1926-1973) provides perfect illustration for this phenomenon. In her ‘fetish-lamps’, combining polyester with electric light, the artist broached the issues previously often realised in alabaster: female body, light, fragility and impermanence. In the following the position of alabaster in the time of the triumph of arte povera and its new attitude towards art material have been considered. The author noticed that, even though this artistic movement has originated in Italy where alabaster has been discredited by the Volterran mass production, the material has apparently not been critically demythologized as it was the case of marble. Their roots in arte povera have the contemporary works of Marisa Merz or Ettorre Spalletti who have succeeded in retrieving in their abstract works rudimental properties of alabaster. Such interpretation of traditional material is rather exceptional. Most of the important sculptures in alabaster realised since the 1960s relate somehow to the tradition, if not formally then at least thematically. Eduardo Chillida in his extraordinary ‘architectural’ works as Homage to Kandinsky or Homage to the sea exploited the translucency of alabaster, its ability to let light inside and in this way to give shape to the inner space. The other traditional motif reinterpreted by contemporary artists are alabaster windows. It has been taken up by Cristina Iglesias (Untitled – Alabaster room) and Tacita Dean (Alabaster drawings). British artist Alison Wilding combines alabaster with synthetic materials as resin to look into the problem of duality of objects (Alabastros). She pursues in reinterpretation of old meanings, as in her alabaster work Harbour which stands for Entombment in the series of works being contemporary interpretation of the Passion of Christ in the abstract language. The last discussed artist – Anish Kapoor discovered alabaster for him in 1999 (Untitled). For him as well fundamental is the duality of the form, however in this case derived from the properties of the stone itself. Rough crust of alabaster block contrasts with its glowing polished inner core. Common for most of these artists is undoubtedly an attempt to regain the spirituality in art. They consciously use for this purpose the material for ages regarded as mystic. Summarising the author considers the reasons of the mystic interpretation of alabaster.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.