Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  scientific discussion
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Nauki o polityce i ich usytuowanie w systemie nauk

100%
EN
As the political science has been assigned to new field and domain of social science in 2011 instead of being assigned to humanities, it has caused astonishment and some kind of discomfort in many centres of political science. It was similar to introducing of a new field called public policy science. Assessment of the environment was quiet diverse. As far as by the public policy science one can notice lack of interest, by the new assignment of policy science one can distinguish three contentions: inclusion of the political sciences in the domain of social science, renewed assignment of policy sciences to humanities and assignment of the political sciences to both domains (management studies alike). The third solution is the most supported one in the environment of political scientists. On the same time statements of politicians about reportedly demanded education of welders instead of political scientists and diminished interest with political studies have made the environment of policy analysis anxious. It is to be emphasised that we are not newly formed field of science and any discussions about status of our domain are an ancient history. At the present day staff of the centres of political sciences is outweighed by people, who graduated political studies and their scientific development together with their tittles of professor have been connected with investigations on the field of political studies. This way the environment grows stronger. A few dangers to political science can be pointed out. First of all there is an aspiration to autonomy of some subfields. Second, there is lack of scientific discussion in the environment. Third, there is a western technique of mechanical “scaling”, “measuring” and other ways of evaluation of one’s academic background, which does not fit to Polish reality and also pervert valuable academic backgrounds.
EN
The article concerns a subject of legal dialogue. At first, a definition of discussion is explained. Then a rational discussion is described the aim of which is to strive the truth. Afterwards, a rhetorical discussion is defined whose the main purpose is to win a dispute. These two types of discussion are compared with the legal dialogue both the scientific and the practical one. This text points out the main features of the rational and rhetorical discussion. It pays attention on some differences as well. The issue of disloyal eristic tricks is also marked with an assessment of their using. In conclusion, the assessment of both types of discussion and their usefulness in scientific and practical discourse were indicated.
PL
Artykuł dotyczy problematyki dyskursu prawniczego. Rozważania rozpoczyna wyjaśnienie pojęcia dyskusji. Następnie jest opisana dyskusja racjonalna, której celem jest dążenie do prawdy. Jako kolejną przedstawiono dyskusję retoryczną, której celem jest przede wszystkim zwycięstwo w sporze. Te dwa typy dyskusji są zestawione z dyskursem prawniczym – zarówno naukowym, jak i praktycznym. W niniejszym opracowaniu wskazano na główne cechy dyskusji racjonalnej i retorycznej, zwracając jednocześnie uwagę na występujące między nimi różnice. Przedstawiając problematykę dyskusji retorycznej, poruszono również kwestię nielojalnych chwytów erystycznych oraz dokonano oceny ich stosowania przez uczestników dyskusji. W konkluzji wskazano ocenę obu typów dyskusji oraz ich przydatność w dyskursie naukowym i praktycznym.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.