Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  scientific fraud
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Podvod jako vážný problém světové vědy i aktuální české historiografie – poznámka k článku Jiřího Peška z ČČH 112, 2014, s. 497–511

100%
Volná K.
Český časopis historický (The Czech Historical Review)
|
2015
|
vol. 113
|
issue 1
145-146
EN
The reaction to the paper of Jiří Pešek denies author’s assessment of the publication “JAREŠ, SPURNÝ, VOLNÁ: Náměstí Krasnoarmějců 2: Teachers and students of the Faculty of Arts of the Charles University in the period of normalization (1969-1989), Praha 2012” as methodologically incorrect and spinning the oral testimonies herein cited. His relegation of thepublication among the cases of evident scientific frauds by three sentences in a footnote only and without any detailed arguments appears to be unfair and malevolent.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Playing with Benford's Law

88%
Kopczewski T., Okhrimenko I.
e-mentor
|
2019
|
issue 3 (80)
34-44
EN
This paper presents a classroom experiment, the simulations, and a research which familiarize the students with the Benford’s Law. This law is widely used in a tax fraud detecting procedures. This paper shows that: i) the Benford’s Law can be useful in extending the simple perception of the probability which is presented at the lectures concerning the risk, ii) can be an excellent example of using data processing for the classroom tasks, iii) by the experience of the fraud detecting technique the students might change their attitude to cheating. The experiment and the prepared R codes can be used in the numerous courses, such as accounting, applied microeconomics, and quantitative methods.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Publications in Scientific Journals – the New Face of Deception

88%
Skórzewska-Amberg M.
Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem
|
2022
|
vol. 14
|
issue 4
20-28
EN
The review process of texts submitted for publication in scientific journals is one of the main ways of evaluating the scientific output of their authors. Any disruptions in this process can have serious and far-reaching consequences, not only in terms of the credibility and integrity of the author themselves, but – most importantly – in terms of the confidence in their achievements. Attempts to distort the review process have so far occurred most often in medical and exact sciences. The case of “The Critique of Law” discussed herein shows that attempts at scientific fraud affect also legal sciences. The purpose of the article is to inform the scientific community worldwide about subsequent attempts of unethical scholarly activities, to describe instances of malpractice, and to point out some of the possible ways to prevent the fraud in question
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.