Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  security guard
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The aim of the article is to show the way of security agencies operation at the courts in Poland. Firstly, the author indicates the most important regulations regarding the protection of persons and services, as well as the most important rights and obligations of security officers in the general and then discussed principles of organization of protective actions in public buildings. Next, the author points out the rights and obligations of court security officers based on the regulations contained in the network and the scope of the terms of contract for protection services of selected courts in Poland. There are terms of security services in the courts of the Republic of Poland by private companies specializing in this field shortly characterized, as well as the principles of announcing a tender. This leads to the conclusion that private security agencies in Poland are very important for courts functioning, which really take into account the sense of security of all persons staying in the court.
EN
Th e author presents the results of research carried out in property and personal security companies. Th e research was carried out both on the basis of a theoretical method based on qualitative analysis of legal acts, critical analysis of scientifi c literature as well as the empirical method consisting of using research tools such as questionnaires and expert interviews. Th e research came up with a positive answer to the question: Is it possible to increase the participation of property and personal security companies in ensuring public safety in Poland? Th e author believes that it is necessary to create a symbiotic formal and legal system that determines the use of human resources in broadly considered state security and in the process of implementing the objectives of national security policy by all levels of government either, state, local or private. Th e author notes that enhancing the effi ciency of security entities is possible, inter alia, through continuous technological development and the exchange of knowledge between national security entities and the authorities responsible for managing security through regulation. According to him, the exchange of knowledge, experience and information between the public and private sectors, and the implementation of best practices in the fi eld of security for day-to-day practice, improves the eff ectiveness of security policy. One such preventive measure is the creation of a formal and legal basis for conducting a security policy based on an integrated system of exploitation of experience, in which all entities responsible for the security of the Republic of Poland participate. Th is publication indicates the direction of action that the author believes should be taken to make better use of the private security sector in the state security system.
EN
This paper presents the issue of the role and responsibilities of security guard in the context of the VIP protection. The author of the text came from a definitional recognition of safety and protection. The professional preparation of security officer to exercise one's professional tasks with the distinction of gender was presented. The stages of organizing personal VIP protection teams were described. Personal protective equipment of security guard was shown.
PL
Niniejszy tekst prezentuje zagadnienie roli i zadań pracownika ochrony w ochronie VIP-a. Autor tekstu wyszedł od definicyjnego ujęcia bezpieczeństwa oraz ochrony. Przedstawił profesjonalne przygotowanie pracownika ochrony do pełnionych zadań zawodowych z rozróżnieniem na płeć. Opisał etapy organizowania zespołów ochrony osobistej VIP-a. Ukazał wyposażenie agenta ochrony osobistej.
EN
Author has done research focused on diagnose of the condition of companies of people and property protection and security guards working within this companies. Results of this research showed that at this moment companies of the people and property protection are currently not being used as a public security element. Author has proved that this companies have the required potential which if used properly can improve the sense of security in Poland. To make it possible it is necessary to make legal, economic and organisational changes. As the final result of the research author based on his own experience provides concrete proposals and the direction of change that could optimise and increase participation of companies of people and property protection in the Polish security system.
EN
By introducing detailed regulations concerning the requirements to be met by a candidate for security personnel, the legislator determined the specificity of employment for this group of professionals. The basic and fundamental question in terms of rules of employment is whether access to this profession should be regulated, or whether deregulation would be the right solution? The Polish legislator decided on partial deregulation in terms of the aforementioned group of employees. This deregulation manifests itself in the fact that a person performing tasks and duties of a security guard is not required to possess a licence for that kind of professional activities, while maintaining the qualification requirements neccesary of certain activities named by the legislator. It appears that the main reason for limited deregulation was a desire to maintain the prestige of the profession, which could have been enhanced by provisions introducing the requirement to hold a license. However, it should be emphasized that another reason for restricting access to the profession is a matter of security. The dualism of regulations in this respect, however.
PL
Ustawodawca, wprowadzając szczegółowe regulacje dotyczące wymogów, jakie powinien spełnić kandydat na pracownika ochrony, zdeterminował specyfikę zatrudnienia tej grupy pracowników. Podstawowym i zasadniczym pytaniem w zakresie zasad zatrudnienia jest pytanie, czy należy reglamentować dostęp do zawodu, czy też właściwym rozwiązaniem byłaby jego deregulacja. Ustawodawca polski zdecydował się na częściową deregulację w przypadku powyższej grupy pracowników Przejawem deregulacji zawodu pracownika ochrony jest dopuszczalność jego wykonywania przez osoby wykonujące zadania ochrony w zakresie niewymagającym posiadania stosownej licencji, przy jednoczesnym zachowaniu wymogów kwalifikacyjnych dla wykonywania niektórych czynności wskazanych przez ustawodawcę. Wydaje się, że przesłanką ograniczonej deregulacji była chęć utrzymania prestiżu zawodu pracownika ochrony, który mogłyby zwiększać przepisy wprowadzające wymóg legitymowania się licencją. Przy czy należy podkreślić, że również względy bezpieczeństwa stanowią bez wątpienia uzasadnienie dla ograniczenie dostępu do zawodu. Dualizm przepisów w tym zakresie wpływa jednak na różnice w zakresie dostępu do zawodu
EN
The article is an attempt to present the regional history of the prison system of the Second Polish Republic on the example of the prison in Drohobycz. The establishment and the process of integration of the above-mentioned prison into the Polish penitentiary system were characterized, the specificity of its organization and staffing were determined, and selected elements of everyday life of prisoners were presented. At the same time, the author did not take up the issue of the characteristics of political prisoners, believing that it was a topic for a separate approach. In the interwar period, the prison in Drohobycz (Drohobycz Prison on Górka) belonged to the 1st class and was one of the largest penal units of the Second Polish Republic intended for the most dangerous criminals sentenced to long-term and life imprisonment. The prison, which was to replace the Lwów “Brygidki”, was opened in 1913. It suffered serious material losses during the Great War (1914–1918). Renovation works, carried out in the 1920s, allowed for the launch of a modern prison, the infrastructure of which developed intensively in the next decade. At that time, in Drohobycz prison was established a district hospital for mentally ill prisoners, serving prisoners from the Kraków and Lwów appellations. Moreover, there was a large gardening school there. At the same time, the prison was suffering from severe overcrowding, and at the end of 1934, it had more than 1,450 people. The prisoners did not only perform various types of work in the workshops and on the farm of the prison, but also had access to spiritual care as well as cultural and educational life.
PL
Artykuł jest próbą zaprezentowania regionalnej historii więziennictwa II Rzeczypospolitej na przykładzie więzienia w Drohobyczu. Omówiono jego powstanie oraz proces włączenia do polskiego systemu penitencjarnego. Opisano strukturę organizacyjną kadrową, przedstawiono wybrane elementy życia codziennego więźniów, choć bez charakterystyki grupy więźniów politycznych, gdyż jest to zagadnienie wymagające osobnego ujęcia. W okresie międzywojennym zakład karny w Drohobyczu (Więzienie karne w Drohobyczu na Górce) należał do więzień I klasy i był jedną z największych tego typu jednostek II Rzeczypospolitej, przeznaczonych dla najbardziej niebezpiecznych przestępców, odsiadujących kary długoterminowego i dożywotniego pobytu w więzieniu. Więzienie, mające zastąpić lwowskie Brygidki, rozpoczęło działalność w 1913 r. Poniosło poważne straty materialne w okresie Wielkiej Wojny (1914–1918). Prace remontowe w latach dwudziestych pozwoliły na uruchomienie nowoczesnego zakładu karnego, którego infrastruktura rozwijała się intensywnie w kolejnym dziesięcioleciu. W tym czasie na jego terenie powstał okręgowy szpital dla nerwowo i psychicznie chorych więźniów, który obsługiwał osadzonych z apelacji krakowskiej oraz lwowskiej. Ponadto na obszarze więzienia istniała duża szkoła ogrodnicza. Jednocześnie w tym czasie placówka borykała się z problemem przeludnienia – pod koniec 1934 r. przebywało w niej ponad 1450 osób. Więźniowie nie tylko wykonywali różnego rodzaju prace w warsztatach i gospodarstwie zakładu karanego, ale też mieli dostęp do opieki duchownej oraz życia kulturalno-oświatowego.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.