Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  social benefit
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
EN
The paper summarizes the author’s experience of conducting economic scientific research. Economic scientific research is understood as both an analysis of economic phenomena and research purchased on the market of research services. The former are not subject to ethical dilemmas. It is a professional approach backed by sound economic theory that is important. The latter, regardless of who purchases research services, pose a risk of ethical dilemmas and conflicts of interest. The area of potential risk is connected to expectations of organizations purchasing research services. In most cases organizations are interested to receive objective assessments or recommendation necessary to take decisions. Ethical conflict appears when the destination of research is lobbing or a company’s image creation. The results of research may be used as an instrument of competition. It is thus vital that a research organization should judge the ethical dimension of undertaken research tasks. Research projects being socially beneficial should be definitely undertaken. In controversial cases, the conviction of the rightfulness in the ethical dimension ought to be decisive. In all cases the principal rule should be aiming at achieving scientifically objective assessments and opinions.
EN
Objectives Legislators and policymakers have expressed strong interest in intervention programs to reduce dependence on social disability benefits. Hybrid: ambulatory followed by home-based cardiac telerehabilitation – hybrid cardiac rehabilitation (HCR) seems to be a novel alternative for standard cardiac rehabilitation for patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) as a form of pension prevention paid by the Social Insurance Institution (SII). The kind of professional status may bias the motivation to return to work after HCR. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether the professional status can affect the effects of HCR. Material and Methods One hundred fifty-two patients with CVD referred by the SII for a 5-week HCR were qualified for the study. Patients (87.7% males), aged 57.31±5.61 years, were divided into 2 subgroups: W) white-collar employees (N = 22) and B) blue-collar employees (N = 130). To evaluate functional capacity, an exercise test on a treadmill was used. Results The number of days of absence in the cardiac rehabilitation program did not differ between the groups (mean ± standard deviation – B: 1.09±3.10 days, W: 1.95±3.64 days). There were significant improvements (p < 0.05) in measured variables after HCR in both (W and B) groups (max workload: 8.21±2.88 METs (measured in metabolic equivalents) vs. 9.6±2.49 METs, 7.76±2.51 METs vs. 8.73±2.7 METs, resting heart rate (RHR): 77±16.22 bpm vs. 69.94±12.93 bpm, 79.59±14 bpm vs. 75.24±11.87 bpm; double product, i.e., product of heart rate and systolic BP (DP rest) 10 815.22±2968.24 vs. 9242.94±1923.08, 10 927.62±2508.47 vs. 9929.7±2304.94). In group B, a decrease in systolic blood pressure (BP syst. – 137.03±17.14 mm Hg vs. 131.82±21.13 mm Hg), heart rate recovery in the 1st minute after the end of peak exercise (HRR1) (99.38±19.25 vs. 93.9±19.48) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (1.22±0.53 vs. 1.11±0.36) was observed. In group W, a decrease in diastolic blood pressure (BP diast.) at rest was observed (88.28±9.79 mm Hg vs. 83.39±8.95 mm Hg). The decrease in resting HR was significantly greater in group W (69.94±12.93 vs. 75.24±11.87, p = 0.034). Conclusions Hybrid cardiac rehabilitation is feasible and safe with high adherence to the program regardless of the patient’s professional status. Professional status did not influence the beneficial effect of HCR on exercise tolerance.
PL
Ubóstwo jest problemem globalnym, który zawsze towarzyszył ludzkości. Współcześnie zjawisko to najczęściej dotyka rodzin wielodzietnych, a jego skutki najbardziej uderzają w dzieci. Brak środków na zaspokojenie podstawowych potrzeb bytowych stanowi zagrożenie dla ich zdrowia i prawidłowego rozwoju, jest przyczyną zaniedbań wychowawczych i powodem społecznego wyobcowania. Dzieciństwo w biedzie prowadzi często do przejmowania złych wzorców i powielania stylu życia poprzednich pokoleń. Moralnym obowiązkiem społeczeństwa oraz zadaniem władz publicznych jest udzielenie wsparcia osobom i rodzinom znajdującym się w trudnej sytuacji materialnej. Pomoc tę państwo zapewnia poprzez redystrybucję wytworzonych dóbr. Socjalnoprawna ochrona rodziny zabezpieczona jest przez system świadczeń wyrównujących nie tylko dochody, ale i deficyty społeczne.
EN
Poverty is a global problem which has always affected mankind. Nowadays it troubles predominantly numerous families. Its negative effects can be observed mostly with children. Lack of financial means to satisfy basic living needs poses a threat to their health and proper growth, induces parental negligence and causes social isolation. Childhood in the environment of poverty frequently leads to copying wrong patterns of behaviour as well as adopting the lifestyle of previous generations. It is the moral obligation of society and the responsibility of public authorities to support individuals and families who face a difficult financial situation. Help is offered by means of the redistribution of manufactured goods. Social and legal protection of families is secured through the benefit system, which settles not only proceeds level but also social deficits.
PL
Niniejszy artykuł odnosi się do zagadnienia polityki socjalnej prowadzonej przez polski rząd, a konkretnie programu ,,Rodzina 500+”, który powstał w celu finansowego wsparcia polskich rodzin. Koncepcja programu ulega ciągłym zmianom ze względu na narastające potrzeby społeczeństwa. Głównym celem artykułu jest uzyskanie informacji zwrotnej na temat tego, jak mieszkańcy województwa lubelskiego pobierający świadczenie „Rodzina 500+” postrzegają program. W publikacji zaprezentowano rozważania teoretyczne, jak również badania empiryczne dotyczące programu „Rodzina 500+” w opinii gospodarstwach domowych, które otrzymują świadczenie oraz zamieszkują teren województwa lubelskiego.
EN
This article refers to the issue of social policy conducted by the Polish government, namely the "Family 500+" program, which was established to financially support Polish families. The concept of the program is constantly changing due to the growing needs of the society. The main purpose of the article is to obtain feedback on how the inhabitants of the Lubelskie Voivodeship receiving the "Family 500+" benefit perceive this program. The publication presents theoretical considerations as well as empirical research on the "Family 500+" program in the opinion of households that receive the benefit and live in the Lubelskie voivodeship.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.