Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  statute of limitation
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Spáchanie trestného činu ako predbežná otázka:

100%
EN
The aim of the presented paper is to analyze the problem of resolving preliminary issues in criminal proceeding namely by comparison of their legal regulations in Slovak and Czech criminal proceeding. The paper is specifically focusing on and dealing with question whether it is possible to assess the committing of criminal offense as a preliminary issue in relation to criminal offense which is not the subject of pending criminal proceeding. This problem is analyzed by comparing the practice of the courts in the Slovak Republic and Czech Republic. At the same time, it is analysed the relation between the term of criminal offense commitment and the term guilty, in the context of a question whether a criminal offense committing is supposed to be solved as a preliminary issue and as such is violation of presumption of innocence. Based on the analysis and comparison of court practice, as well as on comparison of terms criminal offense committing and guilty, we have drawn the inference that it is possible to state the committing of another criminal offense as solved preliminary issue and such statement is not violation of a presumption of innocence.
PL
The paper refers to the issue of the limitation period for instituting disciplinary proceedings for student disciplinary tort under the provisions of the Law on Higher Education and Science. The aim is to determine the legal nature of these institutions, assess the basic exponential problems associated with it, and finally consider the possible directions of amendment to the provisions in this regard. The considerations relate to the prescription of a student disciplinary tort, but apply to an identically regulated prescription for disciplinary doctoral torts. The study concludes with an amendment to art. 324 paragraph 4 of the Act.
EN
Running of a period in protection of reputation is crucial both for potential perpetrators and injured parties. Journalists often ponder on how long they are liable for articles written in the past and injured parties ask themselves how much time they have for a lawsuit or a private prosecution. This paper discusses certain issues concerning limitation of claims related to protection of reputation from the perspective of civil law and criminal law both substantive and procedural.
PL
Kwestia upływu czasu w sprawach o ochronę dobrego imienia jest niezwykle istotna zarówno dla potencjalnych sprawców, jak i poszkodowanych. Dziennikarze zastanawiają się, jak długo mogą odpowiadać za napisany w przeszłości artykuł, natomiast osoby poszkodowane zadają sobie pytanie, ile mają czasu na wytoczenie powództwa, czy też złożenie prywatnego aktu oskarżenia. Prezentowany artykuł omawia wybrane problemy dotyczące przedawnienia roszczeń związanych z ochroną dobrego imienia w ujęciu prawa cywilnego i karnego, tak materialnego, jak i procesowego.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.