Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  structural linguistics
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Saussure’s concept of meaning applied to translation from French into English. Igbo and Kalabari languages of Malot’s Sans Famille

100%
Pearl Ngele C., Iyalla-Amadi P. E.
Language, Discourse & Society
|
2019
|
vol. 7
|
issue 1
33-42
EN
Translation can be said to be an exercise based on a tripartite comprehension: that of the text, the original author and the reader of the translated text. In translating therefore, an attempt is often made to create a text that would be comprehensible to the target reader. To effectively do this, several factors are considered, one of which is culture, especially in literary texts where culture is richly presented. A literary translator must therefore reproduce not just language but also culture. An illustration of this can be found in the translation of Hector Malot’s Sans Famille, from French to English, Kalabari and Igbo. To adapt the translated version to the various target audiences, the cultural elements of the original French text have been replaced with those of the target languages but with the semantic content intact. This is known as cultural appropriation, an application of the semio-pragmatic theory. This theory affirms Saussure’s structural linguistics thereby applying structuralism to translation.
2
Content available remote

Souběžná míjení : Marxismus a zlom v pojetí literární "struktury"

86%
Müller R.
Česká literatura (Czech Literature)
|
2018
|
vol. 66
|
issue 2
153-181
EN
This study focuses on a particular distinctive moment in the Czech and French historyof literary thinking which took place in the latter half of the 1960s and which saw not only an encounter of Marxism and structuralism, but also a shift and radical change in the conception of literary structure. Marxist philosopher and historian Robert Kalivodapresents the development of Jan Mukařovský´s structural literary aesthetics from a Marxist and Freudian perspective ; according to him, Mukařovský´s conception matured - in association with the production and reflection of the interwar artistic avant-garde (Karel Teige) - towards a conception of aesthetic function and value as transparent anthropic principles and work of art as a dynamic ensemble of extra-aesthetic functions and values. Simultaneously, the representative of French Althusserian Marxism Pierre Macherey formulates his conception of literary output as a specific mode in the production of speech and literary structure as a space of difference, in which the ideological universalizations of the period are unconsciously presented in a critical light. Within the Czech structuralist tradition - and in harmony with its avant-garde pedigree - a parallel conception then emerges within the works of Oleg Sus and Milan Jankovič of literary structure as a structure that is unconsolidated and unconsolidatable, as the process and action of meaning, the movement of contradictions that will not have culminated in a final and completed synthesis. Analysis of the internal contexts and interrelations of these conceptions leads us to interpret them as the movement of concurrent misses - a radical change in the structure and the opening of its dialectics here has different resonances, caused by a different conception of the subject and the relationship between the work and the social structure - and also a failed meeting, whose connections have for the most part hitherto escaped the attention of literary studies and philosophy historians.
3
Content available remote

Strukturalizm a lingwistyka funkcjonalna

86%
Kiklewicz A.
LingVaria : Półrocznik Wydziału Polonistyki UJ poświęcony zagadnieniom języka i językoznawstwa
|
2013
|
issue 16
63-75
EN
The article investigates the relationship between two directions in modern linguistics, the structural and the functional. The author critically appreciates the commonly held opinion about the opposition of these linguistic paradigms, and shows that structuralism largely bases on a functional analysis. Structuralism was a continuation of the functional approach, which diffused across the humanities in the 19th century, and it is from this perspective that the present paper discusses structuralist studies in the fields of lexicology, morphology, and syntax. Particular attention is paid to the functional aspects of distributional analysis, and to integrative approaches in structural linguistics.
4
Content available remote

Punkty dyskusyjne w rozumieniu pojęcia językowego obrazu świata - widziane z perspektywy badań porównawczych

72%
Grzegorczykowa R.
Etnolingwistyka. Problemy Języka i Kultury
|
2009
|
vol. 21
15-29
PL
W pracy postawiono dwa pytania. Pierwsze pytanie dotyczy „mentalnego obrazu” nazywanego obiektu, utworzonego w myślach/świadomości mówiących. Klasyczna (strukturalna) lingwistyka i logiczna semantyka koncentrują się na cechach istotnych tego obiektu (koniecznych i wystarczających do przyporządkowania go do danej klasy), podczas gdy lingwistyka kognitywna dąży do tego, by traktować wszystkie cechy związane z przedmiotem jako ważne dla jego całościowego obrazu mentalnego. Cechy nieistotne mogą być zarówno potwierdzone przez dowody lingwistyczne (pochodzenie wyrazów, przysłowia itd.), jak też powstawać indywidualnie w jednostkowym tekście. Drugie pytanie dotyczy statusu ontologicznego nazywanych obiektów. Obiekty te mogą być ontologicznie względnie samodzielne, jak organizmy żywe (rośliny, zwierzęta), artefakty (budynki, stoły), albo mogą być wyodrębniane w wyniku ludzkiej, poznawczej, językowej kategoryzacji świata (części ciała, zbiory elementów, stany emocjonalne człowieka). Niektóre z nazywanych obiektów mogą być konstruktami pojęciowymi (modele teoretyczne, ideologie społeczne). Ontologiczny charakter nazywanych obiektów ma zadaniem autorki zasadnicze znaczenie przy ustaleniu tertium comparationis dla badań porównawczych.
EN
The paper deals with two questions. The first question concerns the range of the speaker’s „mental picture” of the object being denoted. Classical (structural) linguistics and logical semantics concentrate on the essential features of the object (the necessary and sufficient conditions in classifying the object as a member of a class), whereas cognitive linguistics tends to treat all features associated with the object as valid for the mental picture of this object. The non-essential features are either entrenched in language use (e.g. derivations, proverbs, etc.), or are individually created in text. The second question concerns the ontological character of the denoted objects. The object can be ontologically relatively independent, e.g. natural beings (plants, animals), certain artifacts (buildings, tables), or it may be an entity identifiable through the human cognitive and linguistic categorization of the world (body parts, certain sets or collections, the emotional states of a person). Some objects can be human mental constructions, such as theoretical models or social ideologies. The ontological character of the objects is essential for establishing the tertium comparationis in comparative research.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Opis struktur syntaktycznych we wczesnych pracach Zenona Klemensiewicza i Noama Chomskiego

72%
Babanov A., Afanasev I.
Językoznawstwo
|
2021
|
vol. 15
73-80
EN
The article focuses on the early works of Z. Klemensiewicz (mostly Składnia opisowa współczesnej polszczyzny kulturalnej, 1937), and N. Chomsky (mainly Syntactic Structures, 1957). These authors come from different linguistic paradigms: structural linguistics, and generative linguistics, respectively. Despite that, their ideas have strong similarities, and although there is no reason to consider Klemensiewicz’s work as a direct inspiration for Chomsky, it seems quite reasonable to argue that different schools of linguistic thought were at times literally one step away from pioneering the generative paradigm.
PL
Artykuł jest poświęcony konfrontacji wczesnych prac Z. Klemensiewicza (głównie Składnia opisowa współczesnej polszczyzny kulturalnej, 1937) i N. Chomskiego (głównie Syntactic Structures, 1957). Autorzy tych dzieł wywodzą się z różnych nurtów lingwistycznych – pierwszy z lingwistyki strukturalnej, drugi z lingwistyki generatywnej. Mimo to w ich ideach da się zauważyć istotne zbieżności. Chociaż nie ma podstaw, by uważać dzieła Klemensiewicza za bezpośrednią inspirację dla Chomskiego, wygląda jednak na całkiem uzasadnione twierdzenie, że różne szkoły myśli lingwistycznej nieraz były dosłownie o krok od zapoczątkowania paradygmatu generatywnego.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.