Search results

1

„Późny wnuk”, słowiarz, sukcesor

100%

Samsel K.

Studia Norwidiana

|

2015

|

vol. 33

285-293

EN

The study is a “multiple hybrid” combining the features of a review of Małgorzata Rygielska’s monograph Przyboś czyta Norwida [Przyboś reads Norwid] and a polemic with the theses contained in the volume. It is also a form of a notebook for an exhaustive and still not finished – albeit quite possible in its utmost form-parallel Przyboś – Norwid. Rygielska’s volume, although it has not proven a complete discussion of the present report, surely is the most detailed one as for today (against the background of the texts, among others by Barbara Łazińska and Przemysław Dakowicz). The context of the author’s reconnaissance is – it has to be admitted – specific. It is formed, on the one hand, by the theory of reading, and on the other, by the area of theory of interpretation. A lack of discussion of Norwid’s Test as a whole (for generally unknown reasons the author passes over Part V and Part VI of Przyboś’s essay, both of them symptomatic, sketching a peculiar, the author’s own psycho-biography of Norwid). Also missing a chance to reinterpret the whole volume More about the Manifesto as “coming to terms with Norwid’s influences” that does not have its counterpart in Polish literature seems to be a drawback.

2

„Późny wnuk”, słowiarz, sukcesor

100%

Samsel K.

Studia Norwidiana

|

2015

|

vol. 33

285-293

EN

The study is a “multiple hybrid” combining the features of a review of Małgorzata Rygielska’s monograph Przyboś czyta Norwida [Przyboś reads Norwid] and a polemic with the theses contained in the volume. It is also a form of a notebook for an exhaustive and still not finished – albeit quite possible in its utmost form-parallel Przyboś – Norwid. Rygielska’s volume, although it has not proven a complete discussion of the present report, surely is the most detailed one as for today (against the background of the texts, among others by Barbara Łazińska and Przemysław Dakowicz). The context of the author’s reconnaissance is – it has to be admitted – specific. It is formed, on the one hand, by the theory of reading, and on the other, by the area of theory of interpretation. A lack of discussion of Norwid’s Test as a whole (for generally unknown reasons the author passes over Part V and Part VI of Przyboś’s essay, both of them symptomatic, sketching a peculiar, the author’s own psycho-biography of Norwid). Also missing a chance to reinterpret the whole volume More about the Manifesto as “coming to terms with Norwid’s influences” that does not have its counterpart in Polish literature seems to be a drawback.

3

Pomyśleć materializm od nowa

99%

Krzeski J.

Praktyka Teoretyczna

|

2015

|

vol. 18

|

issue 4

240-250

EN

In his book Althusser and His Contemporaries. Philosophyʼs Perpetual War (2013) Warren Montag proposed an interpretation of Louis Althusserʼs work through engagements with Althusserʼs own contemporaries but above all through his engagement with Baruch Spinoza. This review essay is an attempt to both reconstruct and evaluate this attempt by showing heretical nature of Althusserʼs and Spinozaʼs materialism.

PL

Warren Montag w swojej książce Althusser and His Contemporaries: Philosophyʼs Perpetual War (2013) zaproponował spojrzenie na dzieło Louisa Althussera przez pryzmat jego relacji z jemu współczesnymi, ale przede wszystkim jego lektury Benedykta Spinozy. W niniejszym artykule recenzyjnym autor podejmuje się zarówno rekonstrukcji, jak i oceny tej próby, skupiając się na wydobyciu heretyckiego wymiaru materializmu uprawianego tak przez niderlandzkiego filozofa, jak i francuskiego marksistę.

4

(Ir)relevant details in a story

80%

Talia D.

Forum Poetyki

|

2022

|

issue 30

EN

The article is an expression of appreciation for a way of reading that notices the smallest elements in a text, and the richness of the world it portrays. By comparing the reader who follows the main line of action in a story, and therefore goes with its rapid flow, to the reader who instead frequently pauses to look at those details that have been hidden in the folds of a work, the author acknowledges the latter as the one who fully grasps and enjoys the literary sense: someone who sees the work of literature as a faithful representation of life.

PL

Szkic jest wyrazem uznania dla lektury, która dostrzega drobne elementy tekstu, jego świata przedstawionego. Przeciwstawiając sobie czytelnika, podążającego za główną linią opowieści, a zatem zanurzonego w akcję, temu odbiorcy, który się zatrzymuje, by przyglądać się detalom skrytym w fałdach utworu, widzi w tym drugim kogoś, kto w pełni odczuwa literacki sens. Kogoś, kto w dziele potrafi zauważyć analogon życia.

Refine search results

2 Studia Norwidiana

1 Forum Poetyki

1 Praktyka Teoretyczna

1 2023

1 2020

2 2015

2 Samsel K.

1 Krzeski J.

1 Talia D.

„Późny wnuk”, słowiarz, sukcesor

„Późny wnuk”, słowiarz, sukcesor

Pomyśleć materializm od nowa

(Ir)relevant details in a story