Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: unintentional crimes

Sort By:

Limit search:

Dekryminalizacja przestępstwa (nieświadomie) nieumyślnego?

100%

Byczyk M.

Studia Prawnicze

2014

issue 3 (199)

119-136

The author considers the reasonableness of the recently proposed – especially in the German and Ango–American science of Criminal Law – postulates of decriminalization of the unintentional crimes. The analysis of those propositions reveals that they are based on questioning the possibility of proving guilt of the perpetrator of inadvertently negligent crime. Such doubts have generally not been shared by the Polish doctrine of criminal law, although authors considering this question seem have been aware of the special character of the criminalization of those crimes, where there is no culpability of the will. At the same time, the analysis of the formulated on the grounds of theory of criminalization premises of the creating penal prohibitions reveals that the unintentional crimes, especially of inadvertent negligence, fulfill those premises. It does not change the fact that this type of responsibility should be applied exceptionally, more rarely than it is currently the case in the Polish Criminal Law. The achievement of this purpose could be possible by replacing in case of some crimes the unintentionality clause with recklessness clause. The chance to reflect upon this question could be the current discussion upon the changes in the Polish Criminal Code.

O istocie przestępstw nieumyślnych

96%

Nowak P.

Studia Prawnicze KUL

2014

issue 2 (58)

89-113

The subject of the considerations in this article is the analysis of the principles of liability for unintentional crimes, both in terms of objective and subjective aspects. Axis of these deliberations focuses on answering to the question for the criteria of the objective assignment in the form of objective predictability, breaching of the required rule of caution in handling with the protected legal goods and excessive riskiness of behavior, and also their place in the structure of the crime. As the essence of the unintentional crime the author recognizes not allowed risk defined by the rules of caution, as well as the subjective element in the form of awareness of risk.

Предметом обсуждения в этой статье является анализ предпосылок уголовной ответственности за неумышленные преступления - как с точки зрения объективных так и субъективных. Сущностью проблемы в контексте предпосылок субъективных являются критерии объективных результатов, т.е.объективная предсказуемость результатов, нарушение требуемого принципа осторожности, а также чрезмерно рискованного поведения и их места в структуре преступления. Сутью преступления неумышленного автор признает допустимый риск, дополненый правилами осторожности, а также субъективный элемент в виде осознания риска.

Refine search results

1 Studia Prawnicze

1 Studia Prawnicze KUL

2 2014

1 Byczyk M.

1 Nowak P.

Search results

Dekryminalizacja przestępstwa (nieświadomie) nieumyślnego?

O istocie przestępstw nieumyślnych