Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  verbs of perception
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

O jednostkach trójargumentowych z ciągiem czuć

100%
Cejmer A.
Linguistica Copernicana
|
2014
|
issue 11
69-86
EN
The paper constitutes a semantic analysis of the unit of language containing the verb of perception czuć (feel). The aim of the analysis is to establish the proper shape of the lexical unit. The author aubstantiates the recognition of two shapes: [ktoś] czuje [coś] [czymś] and [ktoś] czuje [coś] [gdzieś], and then she demonstrates the semantic adequacy of these two, while simultaneously, pointing to the difference in the form of the argument relating to the sensory organ. The remainder of this article consists in the comparison of Polish units with their English and French equivalents. As a result of this comparison, certain similarities between the Polish and foreign units are indicated: the similar three argument shape of the discussed units, as well as, possible alternative formal realizations of the argument relating to the sensory organ.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Les propositions infinitives régies par un verbe de perception dans les dictionnaires français-polonais

88%
Ucherek W.
Academic Journal of Modern Philology
|
2020
|
vol. 9
197-206
EN
In French, there exists a kind of infinitive subordinate clause (ICP) introduced by a perception verb like voir, regarder, entendre, écouter and sentir. These structures, composed of a noun phrase and an infinitive verb, do not exist in Polish. This anisomorphism implies difficulties of translation and bilingual dictionaries are one of the potential sources of knowledge about the ways of translating the ICP structures into Polish. We analysed the articles of the five French perception verbs from several contemporary French-Polish dictionaries in order to verify how their authors deal with the lexicographic treatment of the ICP. The general conclusion is that the investigated structure is usually not given in all five perception verb entries of the same dictionary, and the choice of these entries seems to be random. What is more, in most of them, we only found set expressions containing the ICP clause and not free phrases. Frequently, the latter simply appear among examples of the use of the verb headword. Concerning the Polish equivalents, their choice is random too and it happens that the most frequent of them, the jak P (“as P”) structure, is not given. Thus, the microstructure of the analysed entries needs to be improved.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

De l’infinitive de perception dans la pratique traductologique

65%
Marsac F., Ucherek W., Dańko M.
Studia Romanica Posnaniensia
|
2019
|
vol. 46
|
issue 1
115-136
EN
The subject of the study are the infinitive subordinate clauses (ICP). These infinitive structures, introduced by a perception verb like voir (‘see’), regarder (‘watch’), entendre (‘hear’), écouter (‘listen’) and sentir (‘smell’), are composed of two complements: a noun phrase and a verb infinitive (j’entends les oiseaux chanter ‘I hear birds sing’). We are interested in ICP in a French-Polish traductological perspective. As this structure, so widespread in French, is not to be found in Polish, this Slavic language offers at least eight different ways of translating it (observed in the corpora), the most frequent of which turns out to be the jak P (‘as P’) structure (*słyszę ptaki śpiewać/śpiewać ptaki ‘I hear birds sing/I hear sing birds’; słyszę, jak ptaki śpiewają/śpiewają ptaki, literally ‘I hear as birds sing/sing birds’). Even though we regularly come across this linguistic phenomenon in our profession (we teach French to Polish bachelor students), there is one basic issue that intrigues us: how do the translators choose one of the eight available structures in their native language? Are their choices random, or lingustically constrained? To answer this thorny question, we have decided to adopt as a theoretical framework (adapting them to ICP) the research tools proposed by Professor Eugeniusz Ucherek (University of Wrocław, Poland, 1982), who originally constituted a method of contrastive French-Polish analysis of prepositions.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.