Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  workplace incivility
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Lodz Papers in Pragmatics
|
2010
|
vol. 6
|
issue 2
305-339
EN
The research to be presented focuses on the impoliteness strategies used by the main character in the TV series "House, M.D." and the responses to them, as well as the potential reason(s)/intention(s) behind impoliteness use as indicated by (Culpeper 1996) and (Culpeper, Bousfield and Wichman 2003). The data comprised transcripts from Season 1, episodes 1-20, broadcast on Fox TV in 2004-2005, taken from http://twiztv.com/scripts/house. This paper argues that, following Leech's (1993) conception of irony, which is the same as Culpeper's conception of sarcasm, the latter being a pervasive feature of Dr House's conversational style, he does not overtly conflict the Politeness Principle but, according to Partington (2007), tries to be interesting, memorable and show alignment with the hearer. Thus he seems to try to preserve, in a way, social harmony by not causing great damage to his interlocutor's face but allowing him/her to arrive at the offensive point of his remark via an implicature. Furthermore, in the context of the hospital setting, although he has the legitimate power and the expert power, in Spencer-Oatey's (2000) terms, to be direct he opts for indirectness. Regarding intentions, his use of impoliteness towards his trainees might be compared to army training (Culpeper 1996), while his being impolite with his patients to the American adversarial legal system (Lakoff 1989). Lastly, the responses of Dr House's interlocutors, mainly his trainees, which gradually escalated in impoliteness, are in line with the consequences of workplace incivility (Anderson and Pearson 1999).
PL
Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie propozycji terminologicznego uporządkowania w obszarze przemocy w miejscu pracy. Logika wywodu tekstu będzie prowadziła od przedstawienia różnych typów definicji mobbingu poprzez analizę różnych jego rodzajów. Wynikiem będą własne propozycje terminologiczne autora zmierzające do wyodrębnienia trzech rodzajów przemocy psychicznej w miejscu pracy. Powyższa klasyfikacja zostanie poparta wynikami badania sondażowego na reprezentatywnej próbie ogólnopolskiej.
EN
The subject of the article is to present terminological proposals in the area of violence in the workplace. The logic of the text will lead from the presentation of the different types of definitions of mobbing through the analysis of its various types. The results of this analysis will be terminological proposals which aim is to identify three types of psychological violence in the workplace. This classification is supported by the results of survey on a representative nationwide sample.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.