DIFFERENCE WITHOUT DISTINCTION? (Vidminnist bez riznytsi?)

• Authors: Bouveresse Jacques
• Languages of publication: UK

Abstracts

EN

The paper is devoted to the problem of difference without distinction between the analytical and continental philosophy which cannot be formulated at the level of certain metaphilosophy but remains absolutely real and sufficiently perceptible at the level of the method used by philosophers in studying philosophy. Being far from the position of oikumenism and the idea of overcoming the distinctions of two traditions in post-analytical philosophy, the author emphasizes that, in spite of the divergences in education, style and interests which tend, to a more or less extent, to the history of philosophy, one gains an impression that the question is in two different disciplines which difference is reduced to the variation in the rules of the same (philosophic) game. The author does not think that the dialogue between representatives of those positions, which retains the latter unchanged, may be useful and will favour the rapprochement of the two philosophic traditions.

Keywords

EN

ANALYTICAL CANON; ANALYTICAL PHILOSOPHY; CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY; HEROIC / VANGUARD CONCEPTION OF PHILOSOPHY; LINGUISTIC PHILOSOPHY

Discipline

• PHILOSOPHY: PHILOSOPHY

• Publisher: G.S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
• Journal: Філософська Думка
• Year: 2010
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 23-43
• Document type: ARTICLE

Contributors

author

Bouveresse Jacques

• Jacques Bouveresse, College de France (for more information address the editor of 'Filosofska dumka', vul. Triokhsviatytelska, 4, 01001, Kyiv-01, Ukraine).

Identifiers

CEJSH db identifier

10UAAAAA081015