The subject of -ing forms in a legal English corpus

• Authors: Janigova S.
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The article concentrates on the subject forms of -ing sentence condensers. We tested the general linguistic opinions against the findings obtained by analysis of a corpus compiled from two genres of legal English, i.e. legislation and judicial decisions. Our corpus research derived from a scalar approach to particular types of -ing forms and concentrated on gerundial and participial condensers. Corpus findings confirmed statistical prevalence of the common case subject over the possessive case subject, which, however, cannot be treated as a proof of a higher degree of formality of the possessive case as the law reports comprise both forms without 'prima facie' semantic or stylistic distinction. A specific feature found in respect of the legislative genre is exclusiveness of the possessive form with the pronouns, and the common case form with the nouns. The imperative of explicit expression of the -ing agent that is not identical with the matrix agent intensifies up the axis: deverbal noun - -ing verbal noun - gerund - -ing participle as condenser - -ing participle as indicator of the progressive aspect of a finite verb. Frequency corpus findings suggest that in the case of a possibility of pragmatic identification of the agent, its explicit formal absence is not treated as defective, hence unattached gerundial and participial constructions show a rather stable position in the language system.

Keywords

EN

ING - SENTENCE CONDENSERS; LEGAL ENGLISH CORPUS; POSSESSIVE CASE SUBJECT

Discipline

• PHILOLOGY_&_LINGUISTICS: PHILOLOGY & LINGUISTICS

• Publisher: Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Arts, Czech Republic
• Journal: Linguistica Pragensia
• Year: 2007
• Volume: 17
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 1-16
• Document type: ARTICLE

Contributors

author

Janigova S.

• S. Janigova, redakce casopisu Linguistica Pragensia, Ustav pro jazyk cesky AV CR, v.v.i., Letenska 4, 118 51 Praha 1, Czech Republic

References

• Biber, D. et al. (1999): Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow.
• Brown Corpus (1979).
• Chartrand, M. et al. (1997): English for Contract and Company Law. Sweet and Maxwell Limited, London.
• Chromá, M. (2003): New Introduction to Legal English, díl I and II. Praha, Karolinum.
• Curme, G. O. (1979): A Grammar of the English Language, vol. II. Essex, Connecticut, VERBATIM.
• Curme, G. O. (1980): A Grammar of the English Language, vol. I. Essex, Connecticut, VERBATIM.
• Dušková, L. (1988): Mluvnice současné angličtiny na pozadí češtiny. Praha, Academia.
• Dušková, L. (1999a.): Studies in the English Language, part 1. Praha, Karolinum - Charles University Press.
• Dušková, L. et al. (1999b): Studies in the English Language, part 2. Praha, Karolinum - Charles University Press.
• Hladký, J. (1961): Remarks on complex Condensation Phenomena in Some English and Czech Contexts. In: Brno Studies in English 3, 105-118.
• Jespersen, O. (1965): A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, part 5. London, Copenhagen, George Allen and Unwin LTD - Ejnar Munksgaard.
• Jespersen, O. (1966): Essentials of English Grammar. London, George Allen and Unwin LTD.
• Lees, R. B. (1960): The Grammar of English Nominalizations. The Hague, Mouton.
• Malá, M. (2004): The Subject in Participial Adverbial Clauses. Linguistica Pragensia, vol. XIV/2, 72-89
• Mathesius, V. (1966): Řeč a sloh. Praha, Československý spisovatel.
• Mathesius, V. (1975): A Functional Analysis of the Present-day English on a General Linguistic Basis. Praha, Academia.
• Quirk, R. et al. (1985): A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language (CGEL). New York and London, Longman.
• Quirk, R. (1995): Grammatical and Lexical Variance in English. London and New York, Longman.
• Trnka, B. (1956): Rozbor nynější spisovné angličtiny III. Praha, SPN.
• Family Law Act (1996).
• Law Reports (2002): Chancery Division of the High Court of Justice (Ch), 305-364.
• Law Reports (2002): Family Division (Fam) of the High Court of Justice, London, Incorporated Council of Law Reporting, 261-311.

Identifiers

CEJSH db identifier

08CZAAAA04198162