Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN

Journal

Studia Ekonomiczne

2019 | 382 | 64-79

Article title

Polityka państwa w zakresie społecznej odpowiedzialności biznesu: przesłanki, narzędzia, ewolucja w XXI wieku

Authors

Doś Anna

Content

Full texts:
06.pdf

Title variants

EN
Public policy for corporate social responsibility support: motives, tools, evolution in the XXI century

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

PL
W najnowszej literaturze następuje ewolucja w podejściu do społecznej odpowiedzialności biznesu (CSR). W drugiej dekadzie XXI uznaje się już, że odpowiedzialność ta nie jest wyłącznie wyrazem autoregulacji, lecz że jest potrzebna polityka państwa w tym zakresie. W artykule wskazano, że przesłanki polityki publicznej w ramach CSR wiążą się z promowaniem prywatnego dostarczenia dóbr publicznych, dążeniem do internalizacji negatywnych efektów zewnętrznych, promowania wartości, redukcji wykorzystywania CSR jako metody arbitrażu regulacyjnego oraz z dążeniem do kodefiniowania kierunków społecznej odpowiedzialności. Na podstawie analizy danych zastanych wykazano, że po 2010 roku nastąpił gwałtowny rozwój polityki wspierania CSR w Polsce. Obecnie narzędzia wykorzystywane w tej polityce to narzędzia uprawniania, ułatwiania, partnerowania i popierania. Ułatwiają one budowanie wartości przedsiębiorstw na podstawie CSR oraz uznanie CSR za istotny czynnik legitymizacji.
EN
In the newest literature corporate social responsibility (CSR) is seen more than self-regulation of businesses. It is acknowledged, that state policy to support CSR is necessary. Motives for public policy to support CSR are: promoting private provisioning of public goods, promoting voluntary internalisation of negative externalities, promoting values, reducing CSR as a way to avoid regulatory pressures and governments striving for co-defining CSR directions. In Poland the rapid evolution of state policy for CSR can be observed. The policy now is complex and it includes tools supporting investing comapny’s resources in CSR and tools developing formal and informal institutions which make CSR an important element of business legitimisation.

Keywords

PL
EN

Publisher

Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach

Journal

Studia Ekonomiczne

Year

2019

Volume

382

Pages

64-79

Physical description

Contributors

author
Doś Anna
  • Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach. Wydział Finansów i Ubezpieczeń. Katedra Finansów Przedsiębiorstw i Ubezpieczeń Gospodarczych

References

  • Albareda L., Lozano J.M., Ysa T. (2007), Public Policies on Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Governments in Europe, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 74(4), s. 391-407.
  • Argandoña A. (1998), The Stakeholder Theory and the Common Good, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 17(9-10), s. 1093-1102.
  • Bagnoli M., Watts S.G. (2003), Selling to Socially Responsible Consumers: Competition and the Private Provision of Public Goods, “Journal of Economics & Management Strategy”, 12(3), s. 419-445.
  • Baldarelli M.G. (2012), New Prospectives in Inter-company Relations, Social Responsibility (CSR) and Social, Ethical and Environmental Accounting in Italy by Way of the Government CSR-SC Project: Theory and Praxis, “Economia Aziendale Online”, 1, s. 1-26.
  • Besley T., Ghatak M. (2007), Retailing Public Goods: The Economics of Corporate Social Responsibility, “Journal of Public Economics”, 91(9), s. 1645-1663.
  • Brammer S., Jackson G., Matten D. (2012), Corporate Social Responsibility and Institutional Theory: New Perspectives on Private Governance, “Socio-economic Review”, 10(1), s. 3-28.
  • Calveras A., Ganuza J.J. (2016), The Role of Public Information in Corporate Social Responsibility, “Journal of Economics & Management Strategy”, 25(4), s. 990-1017.
  • Campbell J.L. (2007), Why Would Corporations Behave in Socially Responsible Ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility, “Academy of Management Review”, 32(3), s. 946-967.
  • Carroll A.B. (1999), Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct, “Business & Society”, 38(3), s. 268-295.
  • Chhabra E. (2014), Corporate Social Responsibility: Should It Be a Law? “Forbes”, https://www.forbes.com/sites/eshachhabra/2014/04/18/corporate-socialresponsibility-should-it-be-a-law/#518bcd0a3736 (dostęp: 10.04.2018).
  • Cialdini R.B., Kallgren C.A., Reno R.R. (1991), A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior, “Advances in Experimental Social Psychology”, 24, s. 201-234.
  • Clarkson P.M., Overell M.B., Chapple L. (2011), Environmental Reporting and Its Relation to Corporate Environmental Performance, “Abacus”, 47(1), s. 27-60.
  • Dahlsrud A. (2008), How Corporate Social Responsibility Is Defined: An Analysis of 37 Definitions, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management”, 15(1), s. 1-13.
  • Department for Business Innovation and Skills (2014), Good for Business & Society: Government Response to Call for Views on Corporate Responsibility, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/300265/bis-14-651-good-for-business-and-society-government-response-to-call-for-views-oncorporate-responsibility.pdf (dostęp: 10.04.2018).
  • Dyrektywa Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady 2014/95/UE z dnia 22 października 2014 r. w odniesieniu do ujawniania informacji niefinansowych i informacji dotyczących różnorodności przez niektóre duże jednostki oraz grupy.
  • Falck O., Heblich S. (2007), Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing Well by Doing Good, “Business Horizons”, 50(3), s. 247-254.
  • Fox T., Ward H., Howard B. (2002), Public Sector Roles in Strengthening Corporate Social Responsibility: A Baseline Study, World Bank, Washington, DC.
  • Gjølberg M. (2011), Explaining Regulatory Preferences: CSR, Soft Law, or Hard Law? Insights from a Survey of Nordic Pioneers in CSR, “Business and Politics”, 13(2), s. 1-31.
  • Hart S.M. (2010), Self-regulation, Corporate Social Responsibility, and the Business Case: Do They Work in Achieving Workplace Equality and Safety? “Journal of Business Ethics”, 92(4), s. 585-600.
  • High-Level Expert Group on Sustainable Finance (2018), Financing a Sustainable European Economy, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/180131-sustainablefinance-final-report_en.pdf (dostęp: 10.04.2018).
  • Kirton J.J., Trebilcock M.J. (2017), Hard Choices, Soft Law: Voluntary Standards in Global Trade, Environment and Social Governance, Routledge.
  • Kitzmueller M., Shimshack J. (2012), Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility, “Journal of Economic Literature”, 50(1), s. 51-84.
  • Knudsen J.S., Moon J., Slager R. (2015), Government Policies for Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Institutionalisation, “Policy & Politics”, 43(1), s. 81-99.
  • Martínez-Ferrero J., García-Sánchez I.M. (2017), Coercive, Normative and Mimetic Isomorphism as Determinants of the Voluntary Assurance of Sustainability Reports, “International Business Review”, 26(1), s. 102-118.
  • Matten D., Moon J. (2008), “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility, “Academy of Management Review”, 33(2), s. 404-424.
  • Peterková K. (2013), Enhancing Social Responsibility within Global Supply Chains: Is Legal Regulation the Optimal Solution? “Nordicum-Mediterraneum”, Vol. 6, No. 1, s. 30-38, https://skemman.is/bitstream/1946/14231/1/Enhancing.pdf (dostęp: 10.04.2018).
  • Singh A. (2016), Forcing CSR in India: Is Regulation the Answer? https://www.forbes.com/sites/csr/2010/08/16/forcing-csr-in-india-is-regulation-the-answer/#6bbf5e445956 (dostęp: 10.04.2018).
  • Steurer R., Martinuzzi A., Margula S. (2012), Public Policies on CSR in Europe: Themes, Instruments, and Regional Differences, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management”, 19(4), s. 206-227.
  • Stiglitz J. (2004), Ekonomia sektora publicznego, WN PWN, Warszawa.
  • Utting P. (2005), Rethinking Business Regulation. From Self-Regulation to Social Control, UNRISD, http://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/search/F02AC3DB0ED406E0C12570A10029BEC8?OpenDocument (dostęp: 15.04.2018).
  • Vogel D. (2010), The Private Regulation of Global Corporate Conduct: Achievements and Limitations, “Business & Society”, 49(1), s. 68-87.
  • Waagstein P.R. (2011), The Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesia: Problems and Implications, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 98(3), s. 455-466.
  • Walker K., Wan F. (2012), The Harm of Symbolic Actions and Green-washing: Corporate Actions and Communications on Environmental Performance and Their Financial Implications, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 109(2), s. 227-242.
  • Ward H. (2004), Public Sector Roles in Strengthening Corporate Social Responsibility: Taking Stock, World Bank, Washington, DC.
  • Wettstein F. (2009), Beyond Voluntariness, Beyond CSR: Making a Case for Human Rights and Justice, “Business and Society Review”, 114(1), s. 125-152.
  • [www 1] www.biznes.gov.pl (dostęp: 15.04.2018).
  • [www 2] www.pi.gov.pl (dostęp: 15.04.2018).
  • [www 3] www.rodzinaipraca.gov.pl (dostęp: 15.04.2018).

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

ISSN
2083-8611

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.cejsh-19cfdbe2-6c79-41ce-aa9e-dfbd6c5bf538
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.