(NE)ROZHODOVANIE O SÚLADE ÚSTAVNÉHO ZÁKONA S ÚSTAVOU

• Authors: Balog Boris

Title variants

EN

(Non-)decision making on the conformity of the constitutional act with the constitution

• Languages of publication: SK

Abstracts

EN

The article provides a point of view of the regulation stipulating from the 1th January 2021 that the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic does not decide on the conformity of a constitutional law with the constitution. This view is not from the position of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic, as might be expected, but the article presents a view through the exercise of those powers of the National Council of the Slovak Republic that require a constitutional majority. The idea is to point out inflation, relativization and the fallacy of the constitutional majority. This exposes the core of the constitution to a threat against which there must be a protection in place in a democratic and legal state.

Keywords

EN

NATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC; CONSTITUTIONAL COURT; CONSTITUTION; CONSTITUTIONAL MAJORITY

• Publisher: Institute of State and Law of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 104
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 99 – 115

Contributors

author

Balog Boris

• Ústav teórie a dejín štátu a práva a spoločenskovedných disciplín, Fakulta práva, Paneurópska vysoká škola, Slovak Republic

Identifiers

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31577/pravnyobzor.2021.2.02