Genetyzacja społeczeństwa. Społeczne konsekwencje nowej genetyki

• Authors: Jan Domaradzki

Title variants

EN

Genetization of Society. Social Implications of the New Genetics

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

Wiek XX był świadkiem narodzin nowego paradygmatu: genetycznego determinizmu, który przenika biologię, medycynę i kulturę Zachodu. Powszechnie uważa się, że w genach tkwi odpowiedź na pytania o ludzkie choroby, cechy osobowości i zachowania, a nawet na- turę ludzką. Tematem tekstu jest wyłaniająca się z tezy o medykalizacji życia społecznego genetyzacja społeczeństwa. Podstawowym twierdzeniem tekstu jest założenie, że rozwój no- wej genetyki przekształca relacje międzyludzkie, społeczeństwo, kulturę i politykę. Cel jest dwojaki: 1) ukazanie wpływu, jaki nowa genetyka wywiera na wyłonienie się nowych form ryzyka, etyki, indywidualnych i zbiorowych tożsamości, biopolityki i obywatelstwa oraz 2) krytyczna analiza dyskursu nowej genetyki.

EN

The 20th century witnessed the emergence of a new paradigm: genetic determinism which permeates biology, medicine and Western culture. It is commonly believed that the answer to questions regarding human health, personality traits, behavior and human nature in general can be found in human genome. The paper aims to look beyond the medicalization thesis toward the process of genetisation of society. Its main tenet is that the development of new genetics transforms social relations, culture, society and politics. Therefore, the objectives of the author are: 1) to discuss the impact of the new genetics on the emergence of new expressions of personal and collective identities, new forms of biopolitics and governmentality as well as the transformation of the idea of citizenship and ethos of duty, and 2) to present a critical analysis of the discourse of the new genetics.

Keywords

PL

biologiczne obywatelstwo; biopolityka; etyka obowiązku; genetyzacja; nowa genetyka; tożsamość

EN

biological citizenship; biopolitics; ethos of duty; genetization; identity; new genetics

• Publisher: Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Studia Socjologiczne
• Year: 2012
• Issue: 2(205)
• Pages: 9-26

Contributors

author

Jan Domaradzki

• Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu

References

• Conrad, Peter. 1997. Public Eyes and Private Genes. Historical Frames, News Constructions, and Social Problems. „Social Problems” 44(2): 139–154.
• Conrad, Peter. 1999. A Mirage of Genes. „Sociology of Health and Illness” 21(2): 28–241. Dubos, Rene. 1962. Miraże zdrowia. Warszawa: PZWL.
• Duster, Troy. 1990. Backdoor to Eugenics. London: Routledge.
• Ekberg, Merryn. 2005. Governing the Risks Emerging from the Non-medical Uses of Genetic
• Testing. „Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society” 3(1): 1–16.
• Elias, Norbert. 1980. Przemiany obyczajów w cywilizacji Zachodu. Warszawa: PIW.
• Ettorre, Elizabeth. 1999. Experts as ‘Storytellers’ in Reproductive Genetics: Exploring Key Issues. „Sociology of Health and Illness” 21(5): 539–559.
• Freidson, Eliot. 1970a. Profession of Medicine. A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. New York: Harper&Row Publishers.
• Freidson, Eliot. 1970b. Professional Dominance. The Social Structure of Medical Care. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
• Foucault, Michel. 1998. Trzeba bronić społeczeństwa. Wykłady w Collège de France 1976. Warszawa: Fundacja Aletheia.
• Foucault, Michel. 1999. Narodziny kliniki. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo KR.
• Giddens, Anthony. 2006. Nowoczesność i tożsamość. „Ja” i społeczeństwo w epoce późnej nowoczesności. Warszawa: WN PWN.
• Goffman, Erving. 2005. Piętno. Rozważania o zranionej tożsamości. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
• Greco, Monica. 1993. Psychosomatic Subjects and the ‘Duty to Be Well’. Personal Agency within Medical Rationality. „Economy and Society” 22(3): 357–372.
• Hallowell, Nina. 1999. Doing the Right Thing: Genetic Risk and Responsibility. „Sociology of Health and Illness” 21(5): 597–621.
• Haynes, John-Dylan. 2009. Decoding Visual Consciousness from Human Brain Signals. „Trends in Cognitive Sciences” 13(5): 194–202.
• Illich, Ivan. 2002. Limits of Medicine. Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health. New York: Marion Boyers.
• Jennings, Bruce. 2004. Genetic Literacy and Citizenship: Possibilities for Deliberative Democratic Policymaking in Science and Medicine. „The Good Society” 13(1): 38–44.
• Kerr, Anne i Sarah Cunningham-Burley. 2000. On Ambivalence and Risk: Reflexive Modernity and the New Human Genetics. „Sociology” 34(2): 283–304.
• Kevles, Daniel J. i Leroy Hood (red.). 1999. The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press. Lederberg, Joshua. 1963. Molecular Biology, Eugenics and Euphenics. „Nature” 198(4879): 428–429.
• Lemke, Thomas. 2002. Genetic Testing, Eugenics and Risk. „Critical Public Health” 12(3): 283–290.
• Lemke, Thomas. 2004. Disposition and Determinism – Genetic Diagnostics in Risk Society. „The Sociological Review” 52(4): 550–566.
• Lemke, Thomas. 2007. Susceptible Individuals and Risky Rights: Dimensions of Genetic Responsibility. W: R. V. Burri i J. Dumit (red.). Biomedicine as Culture. Instrumental Practices, Technoscientific Knowledge, and New Modes of Life. London: Routledge, s. 150–165.
• Lemke, Thomas. 2010. Biopolityka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo: Sic!.
• Lewontin, Richard C. 1992. Biology as Ideology. The Doctrine of DNA. New York: Harper Perennial.
• Lippman, Abby. 1986. Access to Prenatal Screening Services: Who Decides?. „Canadian Journal of Women Law” 1(2): 434–445.
• Lippman, Abby. 1991. Prenatal Genetic Testing and Screening: Constructing Needs and Rein- forcing Inequities. „American Journal of Law and Medicine” 17(1–2): 15–50.
• Luhmann, Niklas. 2005. Risk: A Sociological Theory. Aldine Transaction.
• Lupton, Deborah. 1997. The Imperative of Health. Public Health and the Regulated Body. London: Sage Publications.
• Melendro-Oliver, Sara. 2004. Shifting Concepts of Genetic Disease. „Science Studies” 17(1): 20–33. Mountcastle-Shah, Eliza, Ellen Tambor, Barbara A. Bernhardt, Gail Geller, Reda Karaliukas,
• Joann Ellison Rodgers i Neil A. Holtzman. 2003. Assessing Mass Media Reporting of Di- sease-related Genetic Discoveries. Development of an Instrument and Initial Findings. „Science Communication”, 24(4): 458–478.
• Myers, Greg. 1990. The Double Helix as Icon. „Science as Culture”, 1(9): 49–72.
• Nelkin, Dorothy i Laurence Tancredi. 1989. Dangerous Diagnostics. The Social Power of Biological Information. New York: Basic Books.
• Nelkin, Dorothy i M. Susan Lindee. 1999. The DNA Mystique. The Gene as a Cultural Icon. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
• Nelkin, Dorothy i Lori Andrews. 1999. DNA Identification and Surveillance Creep. W: P. Conrad i J. Gabe (red.). Sociological Perspectives on the New Genetics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, s. 191–208.
• Novas, Carlos. 2006. The Political Economy of Hope: Patients’ Organizations, Science and Biovalue. „Biosocieties” 1: 289–305.
• Novas, Carlos i Nikolas Rose. 2000. Genetic Risk and the Birth of the Somatic Individual. „Economy and Society” 29(4): 485–513.
• Parsons, Talcott. 1964. The Social System. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe. Pawlikowski, Jakub, Jarosław Sak i Krzysztof Marczewski. 2009. Problemy etyczne i prawne związane z działalnością biobanków. „Diametros” 19: 106–118.
• Petersen, Allan. (b.d.). The New Genetics and ‘Citizenship’. Vital Politics Conference, London: www2.lse.ac.uk/BIOS/pdf/AlanPetersen.pdf [dostęp 10.06.2011].
• Petersen, Allan. 2007. Is the New Genetics Eugenic? Interpreting the Past, Envisioning the Future. „New Formations” 60: 79–88.
• Rainbow, Paul. 1996. Artificiality and Enlightenment’. From Socio-biology to Bio-sociality. W: P. Rainbow. Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press, s. 91–111.
• Rapp, Rayna. 2000. Testing Women, Testing the Fetus. The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.
• Rhodes, Rosamond. 1998. Genetic Links, Family Ties, and Social Bonds: Rights and Responsibilities in the Face of Genetic Knowledge. „Journal of Medicine and Philosophy” 23(1): 10–33. Rose, Nikolas. 2003. Neurochemical Selves. „Society” 41(1): 46–59.
• Rose, Nikolas. 2007a. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-first Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Rose, Nikolas. 2007b. Molecular Biopolitics, Somatic Ethics and the Spirit of Biocapital. „Social Theory and Health” 5: 3–29.
• Rose, Nikolas. 2008. Race, Risk and Medicine in the Age of ‘Your Own Personal Genome’. „BioSocieties” 3: 423–439.
• Rose, Nikolas i Carlos Novas. 2004. Biological Citizenship. W: A. Ong i S. J. Collier (red.). Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, s. 439–463.
• Rose, Steven. 1995. The Rise of Neurogenetic Determinism. „Nature” 373: 380–382. Rothman, Barbara Katz. 1993. The Tentative Pregnancy. How Amniocentesis Changes the Experience of Motherhood. New York/London: W .W. Norton Company.
• Rozin, Paul. 1997. Moralization. W: A. M. Brandt i P. Rozin (red). Morality and Health. Inter- disciplinary Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge, s. 379–401.
• Savell, Kristin. 2008. Turning Mothers into Bioethicists. Late Abortion and Disability. W: B. Bennet, T. Carney i I. Karpin (red.). Brave New World of Health. Sydney: The Federation Press, s. 93–111.
• Scambler, Graham. 2009. Health-related Stigma. „Sociology of Health and Illness” 31(3): 441–455.
• Seavilleklein, Victoria. 2009. Challenging the Rhetoric of Choice in Prenatal Screening. „Bio- ethics” 23(1): 68–77.
• Shakespeare, Thomas. 1999. Losing the Plot? Medical and Activist Discourses of the Contem- porary Genetics and Disability. „Sociology of Health and Illness” 21(5): 669–688.
• Skolbekken, John-Arne. 1995. The Risk Epidemic in Medical Journals. „Social Science and Medicine” 40(3): 291–305.
• Sokołowska, Magdalena. 1980. Granice medycyny. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.
• Sontag, Susan. 1999. Choroba jako metafora. AIDS i jego metafory. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
• Strohman, Richard C. 1997. The Coming of Kuhnian Revolution in Biology. „Nature” 15: 194–200.
• Strohman, Richard C. 2003. Genetic Determinism as a Failing Paradigm in Biology and Medicine. Implications for Health and Wellness. „Journal of Social Work Education” 39: 169–191.
• Sztompka, Piotr. 2007. Zaufanie. Fundament społeczeństwa. Kraków: Znak.
• Tesh, Sylvia N. 1996. Hidden Arguments: Political Ideology and Disease Prevention Policy. New Bruncwick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
• Weber, Max. 1994. Etyka protestancka a duch kapitalizmu. Lublin: Wydawnictwo TEST.
• Zola, Irving. 1972. Medicine as an Institution of Social Control. „The Sociological Review” 20(4): 487–504.
• Alper, Joseph S. i Jonathan Beckwith. 1993. Genetic Fatalism and Social Policy. The Implica- tions of Behavior Genetics Research. „Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine” 66: 511–524.
• Bauman, Zygmunt. 1994. Dwa szkice o moralności ponowoczesnej. Warszawa: Instytut Kultury. Bauman, Zygmunt. 2007a. Płynne czasy. Życie w epoce niepewności. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sic!
• Bauman, Zygmunt. 2007b. Płynne życie. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
• Beck, Ulrich. 2004. Społeczeństwo ryzyka. W drodze do innej nowoczesności. Warszawa: Scholar.
• Beck, Ulrich i Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim. 1999. Individualization and „Precarious Freedoms”.
• Perspectives and Controversies of a Subject-orientated Sociology. W: A. Elliot (red.). Contemporary Social Theory. Oxford: Bleckwell Publishers, s. 156–168.
• Berger, Peter L. 1997. Święty baldachim. Elementy socjologicznej teorii religii. Kraków: Nomos. Berger, Peter L. i Thomas Luckmann. 1997. Modernidad, pluralismo y crisis de sentido. La orientación del hombre moderno. Barcelona: Paidós.
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
• Braun, Bruce. 2007. Biopolitics and the Molecularization of Life. „Cultural Geographies” 14(1): 6–28.
• Conrad, Peter. 1992. Medicalization and Social Control. „Annual Review of Sociology” 18(1): 209–232.