Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2020 | 50 | 2 | 127-170

Article title

Nově identifikovaná díla Štěpána z Pálče († 1423): komentář k Tractatus de universalibus Jana Wyclifa a Opera logicalia z let 1391-1393

Authors

Content

Title variants

EN
New identified works of Štěpán of Páleč (d. 1423): commentary on John Wyclif ’s Tractatus de universalibus and Opera logicalia from 1391-1393
DE
Die neuen entdeckten Werke von Stephanus von Palecz (g. 1423): Kommentar zum Johannes Wyclifs Tractatus de universalibus und Opera logicalia aus dem Jahren 1391-1393

Languages of publication

CS

Abstracts

EN
MS Prague, National Library of the Czech Republic, X H 9 contains anonymous treatises dealing with the issue of universals, confusion, consequences, signification, reference, properties of terms and propositions, restrictions, obligations. Nevertheless, one of the extant tract (Disputata confusionum, on ff. 76r–92r) is attributed to the Prague Realist Štěpán of Páleč (d. 1423). In 1970, František Šmahel proposed a thesis concerning Páleč as an author of these works, i.e. Commentarius in I–IX capitula tractatus De universalibus Johannis Wyclif on ff. 1r–68v, De suppositionibus on ff. 92v–95r, Notabiliora confusionum on ff. 95r–97v, Notabiliora consequentiarum on ff. 98r–101r, Notabiliora super Billingham on ff. 101r–108v, and Collecta obligationum on ff. 109r–111v. The first part of the study provides a content analysis and comparison of Páleč’s quaestio Utrum universalia habeant solum nude pure esse in intellectu divino vel praeter operationem intellectus creati subsistant realiter in propria forma and his Argumenta de universalibus realibus with the anonymous Commentarius in I–IX capitula tractatus De universalibus Johannis Wyclif preserved in the manuscript and published in 2009.
EN
Nine evident cases of intertextuality, along with further apparent borrowings, provide proof of evidence for Páleč’s authorship of the commentary. The second part of the study presents the palaeographical and context analysis along with contextualisation of other treatises (De suppositionibus, Notabiliora confusionum, Notabiliora consequentiarum, Notabiliora super Billingham, and Collecta obligationum). The determined cross-references between them have revealed that all texts, together with Disputata confusionum, comprise Páleč’s parva logicalia circle of treatises from 1391 and 1393 heavily reliant on English logic textbooks (Richard Billingham, William Heytesbury, Richard Ferrybridge or Richard Brinkley). The extant treatises derive from Štěpán’s lectures on logic held at the Prague Faculty of Arts during the early 1390s. All texts shed new light into the context and process of John Wyclif’s proliferation in late medieval Bohemia.

Discipline

Year

Volume

50

Issue

2

Pages

127-170

Physical description

Document type

ARTICLE

Contributors

  • Masarykův ústav a Archiv AV ČR, v. v. i., Gabčíkova 2362/10, 182 00 Praha 1, Czech Republic

References

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.d3ae95b5-f618-44f3-9b1b-36a2b39a7e1e
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.