ON THE AMENDMENT OF ARTICLE 55 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND

• Authors: Gorski A. , Hofmanski P.
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This contribution deals at length with argumentation used by constitutional tribunals of various EU Member States in their decisions on the constitutionality of the European Arrest Warrant. It shows how different the results of that argumentation and interpretation can be, leading to different conclusions. The contribution also examines the influence of ECJ jurisprudence in the Third Pillar on reasoning in constitutional tribunals verdicts. It gives an overview of modes of approaches to such connected issues as consistent interpretation of domestic law with wording and purpose of framework decisions and the issue of primacy of EU law (also in the Third Pillar) as compared to constitutionally proclaimed primacy of the constitution (national constitutions).

Keywords

EN

CONSTITUTIONAL TRIBUNALS; EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT'S CONSTITUTIONALITY; EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE AND THIRD PILLAR

Discipline

• LAW_&_ADMINISTRATION: LAW & ADMINISTRATION

• Publisher: The Kraków Branch of the Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Archivum Iuridicum Cracoviense
• Year: 2006
• Volume: 39-40
• Pages: 69-82
• Document type: ARTICLE

Contributors

author

Gorski A.

author

Hofmanski P.

• A. Gorski, Uniwersytet Jagiellonski, Wydzial Prawa i Administracji, Katedra Postepowania Karnego, ul. K. Olszewskiego 2, 31-007 Kraków, Poland

Identifiers

CEJSH db identifier

08PLAAAA04628875