The Formalist Roots of Stanley Fish’s and E. D. Hirsch’s Hermeneutics

• Authors: Stopel Bartosz

Abstracts

EN

The paper investigates the extent to which Stanley Fish’s constructivism and E. D. Hirsch’s hermeneutics are similar in their assumptions and program. Although it is commonly accepted that they constitute polar opposites of literary theory, Fish and Hirsch are embedded in the theoretical discourse of New Criticism’s approach to literary studies and develop in a form of critique of the formalist stance. The problems they encounter and the way they approach literary texts are shaped by formalist assumptions that eventually lead to serious discrepancies between their postulated theory and practice. Both theories of interpretation seem to be operating within a similar framework of ideas which determines their understanding of the problems regarding literary studies as well as their solutions. What appears to be even more important is that the ‘‘textual” theoretical framework itself causes serious problems for both programmes of literary hermeneutics.

Keywords

EN

Stanley Fish; E. D. Hirsch; constructivism; hermeneutics; New Criticism; literary theory

• Publisher: Institute of English Studies, University of Warsaw
• Journal: Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies
• Year: 2013
• Issue: 22/1
• Pages: 19-33

Contributors

author

Stopel Bartosz

• University of Silesia

References

• Dasenbrock, Reed Way. 1993. “Do We Write the Text We Read?”, in: Literary Theory After Davidson. Reed Way Dasenbrock (ed.). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 18–37.
• Davidson, Donald. 1973. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme”, in: Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, Vol. 47 (1973–1974), 5–20.
• Davidson, Donald. 1993. “Locating Literary Language”, in: Literary Theory After Davidson. Reed Way Dasenbrock (ed.), 295–309.
• Drong, Leszek. 2007. Disciplining the New Pragmatism. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
• Fish, Stanley. 1980. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communitie. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Hermeren, Göran. 1977. “Intencja a interpretacja w badaniach literackich”, in: Pamiętnik Literacki, Vol. LXVIII, No. 4, 1977, 353–383.
• Hirsch, E. D. 1967. Validity in Interpretation. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
• Hirsch, E. D. 1976. The Aims of Interpretation. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Hirsch, E. D. 1982. “The Politics of Theories of Interpretation”, Critical Inquiry, Vol. 8, No. 1, September 1982, 235–247.
• Hirsch, E. D. 1985. “Against Theory?”, In: Against Theory. W. J. T. Mitchell (ed.), 48–53.
• Kalaga, Wojciech. 2001. Mgławice dyskursu. Kraków: Universitas.
• Knapp, Steven and Benn Michaels, Walter. 1985. “Against Theory”, in: Against Theory, W. J. T. Mitchell (ed.), 11–31.