Dlaczego "teoria inteligentnego projektu" jest bardziej interesująca niż tradycyjny kreacjonizm

• Authors: Taner Edis

Title variants

EN

Why "Intelligent Design" Is More Interesting Than Old-Fashioned Creationism

• Languages of publication: PL EN

Abstracts

PL

Taner Edis argumentuje, że choć teoria inteligentnego projektu w dużej mierze po prostu powtarza błędy dawno zdyskredytowanego tradycyjnego kreacjonizmu, część jej twierdzeń może mieć znaczenie dla rozwoju nauki. Edisowi chodzi o twierdzenia, dotyczące natury inteligencji i wykrywania projektu. Mimo iż jego zdaniem nie są one słuszne, zdanie sobie sprawy, dlaczego tak jest, może pomóc naukowcom w dostrzeżeniu, w jak wielkim stopniu współczesna nauka ma charakter interdyscyplinarny, a to mogłoby przyśpieszyć rozwiązanie jednego z najbardziej fundamentalnych problemów naukowych, jakim jest kwestia pochodzenia informacji.

EN

Author argues that even though intelligent design theory for the most part repeats common mistakes of long ago discredited traditional creationism, some of its claims can be significant for the advancement of science. He means claims concerning the nature of intelligence and detection of design. In spite of the fact that in his opinion these claims are incorrect, he points out that when scientists will realize why is that, it will help them to recognize the strongly interdisciplinary character of modern science. In consequence, it could bring the solution for one of the most fundamental scientific issues – the origin of information – more quickly.

Keywords

PL

inteligentny projekt; tradycyjny kreacjonizm; darwinizm; dobór naturalny; losowość; informacja; nauka

EN

intelligent design; old-fashioned creationism; Darwinism; natural selection; randomness; information; science

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Zielonogórski. Instytut Filozofii
• Journal: Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy
• Year: 2007/2008
• Volume: 4-5
• Pages: 81-93

Contributors

author

Taner Edis

• Truman State University

References

• Michael J. BEHE, Czarna skrzynka Darwina. Biochemiczne wyzwanie dla ewolucjonizmu, przeł. Dariusz Sagan, Biblioteka Filozoficznych Aspektów Genezy, t. 4, Wydawnictwo MEGAS, Warszawa 2008.
• Cornelius G. HUNTER, Darwin’s Proof: The Triumph of Religion over Science, Brazos Press, Grand Rapids, MI. 2003.
• Ian F. MUSGRAVE, „Evolution of the Bacterial Flagellum”, w: Matt YOUNG and Taner EDIS (eds.), Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ. 2004.
• Guillermo GONZALEZ and Jay W. RICHARDS, The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos is Designed for Discovery, Regnery Publishing, Washington, DC. 2004.
• William JEFFERYS, „Review of The Privileged Planet”, Reports of the National Center for Science Education 2005, vol. 25, no. 1-2, s. 47-49, http://ncseweb.org/rncse/25/1-2/review-privileged-planet (04.03.2009).
• Gary S. HURD, „The Explanatory Filter, Archaeology, and Forensics”, w: Matt YOUNG and Taner EDIS (eds.), Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ. 2004.
• Jacques MONOD, Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology, Vintage Books, New York 1972.
• Andrew MELNYK, A Physicalist Manifesto: Thoroughly Modern Materialism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 2003.
• Phillip E. JOHNSON, The Wedge of Truth: Splitting the Foundations of Naturalism, InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL. 2000.
• William A. DEMBSKI, „Signs of Intelligence”, w: William A. DEMBSKI and James M. KUSHINER (eds.), Signs of Intelligence: Understanding Intelligent Design, Brazos Press, Grand Rapids, MI. 2001.
• William A. DEMBSKI, Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science and Theology, InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL. 1999.
• William A. DEMBSKI, The Design Revolution, InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL. 2004.
• James BARHAM, „The Emergence of Biological Value”, w: William A. DEMBSKI and Michael RUSE (eds.), Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 2004.
• William A. DEMBSKI, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities, Cambridge University Press, New York 1998.
• Branden FITELSON, Christopher STEPHENS and Elliott SOBER, „How Not to Detect Design – Critical Notice: William A. Dembski, The Design Inference”, Philosophy of Science 1999, vol. 66 (3), s. 472-488.
• Branden FITELSON, Christopher STEPHENS and Elliott SOBER, „Jak nie należy wykrywać projektu”, przeł. Adam Trybus, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy 2007/2008, t. 4/5, s. 53-80, http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php?action=tekst&id=161.
• Jeffrey SHALLIT and Wesley ELSBERRY, „Playing Games With Probability: Dembski’s Complex Specified Information”, w: Matt YOUNG and Taner EDIS (eds.), Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ. 2004.
• Mark PERAKH, Unintelligent Design, Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY. 2004.
• William A. DEMBSKI, No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot be Purchased without Intelligence, Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield, MD. 2002.
• Mark PERAKH, „There is a Free Lunch After All: William Dembski’s Wrong Answers to Irrelevant Questions”, w: Matt YOUNG and Taner EDIS (eds.), Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ. 2004.
• Elliott SOBER, „The Design Argument”, w: William A. DEMBSKI and Michael RUSE (eds.), Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 2004.
• Taner EDIS, „Chance and Necessity – And Intelligent Design?”, w: Matt YOUNG and Taner EDIS (eds.), Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ. 2004.
• Taner EDIS, „How Gödel’s Theorem Supports the Possibility of Machine Intelligence”, Minds and Machines 1998, vol. 8, s. 251-262.
• Karl SIMS, „Evolving 3D Morphology and Behavior by Competition”, w: Rodney BROOKS and Pattie MAES (eds.), Artificial Life IV: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge 1994.
• Barbara FORREST and Paul R. GROSS, Creationism’s Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design, Oxford University Press, New York 2004.