Logical and Metaphysical Assumptions of Bernard Bolzano's Theodicy

• Authors: Dariusz Łukasiewicz
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Bolzano's theodicy is a very good example of Platonism in the philosophy of religion. Above all, Bolzano believes that there obtains an ideal realm of truths in themselves and mathematical objects, which are independent of God. Therefore, we are allowed to conclude that God is only a contractor; true, more powerful than Plato's demiurge because He created substances (and matter) and sustains them in existence, but God must follow a project which is independent of Him. Since the world is determined, by the program and God follows the program, then in fact the program is a god, or better, there is no God (at least in the sense of the classical Christian tradition). Bolzano's project is not related to God's essence, since it is external to God, and is not made by God. Thus, Bolzano's theodicy is also the absolute opposite of the Cartesian theodicy. God in the Cartesian theodicy can change all rules, all scientific laws and, in consequence, He can create any world He wants. Bolzano's God cannot change anything and cannot create a different world than the world determined by the project, a world different than the one He has created. The responsibility of Bolzano's God for the evil in the world is limited by the project of the world.

Keywords

Theodicy; Platonists; Truth; Bolzano, Bernard

• Publisher: Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
• Journal: Forum Philosophicum
• Year: 2007
• Volume: 12
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 33-56

Contributors

author

Dariusz Łukasiewicz

• Kazimierz Wielki University, Bydgoszcz, Poland

References

• Adams, Marilyn McCord, and Robert Merrihew Adams, eds. The Problem of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
• Ajdukiewicz, Kazimierz. “A Semantical Version of the Problem of Transcendental Idealism.” In The Scientific World-Perspective and Other Essays 1931–1963, edited by Jerzy Giedymin, 140–154. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1978. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1120-4_8.
• Betti, Arianna. “The Strange Case of Savonarola and the Painted Fish. On the Bolzanianisation of Polish Thought.” In Actions, Products, and Things: Brentano and Polish Philosophy, edited by Arkadiusz Chrudzimski and Dariusz Łukasiewicz, 55–82. Frankfurt: Ontos, 2006.
• Bolzano, Bernard. Ausgewählte Schriften. Edited by Eduard Winter. Berlin: Union, 1976.
• Bolzano, Bernard. Erbauungsreden an die Hörer der Philosophie und der Prager Universität. Vol. 3. Prag: Braumüller, 1851.
• Bolzano, Bernard. Lehrbuch der Religionswissenschaft. Vols. 1–4. Sulzbach: Seidel, 1834.
• Bolzano, Bernard. Paradoxen des Unendlichen. Leipzig: C. H. Reclam, 1851.
• Bolzano, Bernard. Wissenschaftslehre. Vols. 1–4. Sulzbach: Seidel, 1837.
• Bolzano, Bernard. Theory of Science. Edited and translated by and Rolf George. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972.
• Drozdek, Adam. “Logic and Ontology in the Thought of Bolzano.” Logic and Logical Philosophy 5, no. 3 (1997): 3–18. doi:10.12775/LLP.1997.001.
• Drozdek, Adam. “Prawo postępu i prawo moralne w teologii Bolzana”, Roczniki Filozoficzne 45–46, (1997–1998): 137–150.
• Drozdek, Adam. “Infinity and Bolzano’s Eschatology.” Axiomathes 9, no. 3 (1998), pp. 275–286. doi:10.1007/BF02681654.
• Drozdek, Adam. “Bolzano i ontologia zdań w sobie”, Przegląd Filozoficzny 36 (2000): 105–116.
• Hick, John. Evil and the God of Love. New York: Harper Collins, 1977.
• Howard-Snyder, Daniel. “God, Evil, and Suffering.” In Reason for the Hope Within, edited by Michael J. Murray, 76–115. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1999.
• Husserl, Edmund. Logical Investigations. Translated by J. N. Findlay. London: Routledge, 1970.
• Krause, Andrej. “Was bleibt von der menschlichen Seele nach dem Tod? Bolzanos Antwort in der Athanasia.” In Bernard Bolzanos Religionsphilosophie und Theologie, edited by Winfried Löffler, 273–295. Sankt Augustin: Academia, 2002.
• Löffler, Winfried, ed. Bernard Bolzanos Religionsphilosophie und Theologie. Sankt Augustin: Academia, 2002.
• Łukaszewicz, Dariusz. “Teodycea piekła.” Edukacja Filozoficzna 35 (2003): 353–360.
• Łukaszewicz, Dariusz. “Przyczynek do teodycei Gottfrieda Leibniza.” Przegląd Filozoficzno-Literacki 2 (2004): 75–95.
• Morscher, Edgar, and Peter Simons. “Objektivität und Evidenz.” In Vom Wahren Und Guten: Festschrift Für Balduin Schwarz Zum 80. Geburtstag, edited by Josef Seifert, Fritz Wenisch, and Edgar Morscher, 205–220. Salzburg: St. Peter, 1982.
• Murray, Michael J., ed. Reason for the Hope Within. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1999.
• Rojszczak, Artur, and Jan Woleński. From the Act of Judging to the Sentence The Problem of Truth Bearers from Bolzano to Tarski. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005.
• Seifert, Josef, Fritz Wenisch, and Edgar Morscher, eds. Vom Wahren Und Guten: Festschrift Für Balduin Schwarz Zum 80. Geburtstag. Salzburg: St. Peter, 1982.
• Seymour, Charles Steven. A Theodicy of Hell. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000.
• Stróżewski, Władysław. “Bóg i świat w myśli Tomasza z Akwinu.” In Istnienie i sens, 81–132. Cracow: Znak, 2005.
• Twardowski, Kazimierz. Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen. Eine psychologische Untersuchung. Vienna: Hölder, 1894.
• Woleński, Jan. Epistemologia. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2005.

Identifiers

DOI

10.5840/forphil200712121

URI

http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=25743290&lang=pl&site=ehost-live

URI

http://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=forphil&id=forphil_2007_0012_0001_0033_0056