The Gerundial Constructions in a Diachronic Perspective: Past and Present

• Authors: Dekeyser Xavier
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In Modern English the gerund, historically a nominalized verb in –ung(e), is marked by a gradient of increasing verbalization, from full noun (the reading of the book) to nearly full verbalization (... John having read his essay very carefully), which is due to morphological syncretism in Early Middle English with the present participle in –ind(e). It is demonstrated that this (re)verbalization can be traced diachronically from its incipient phase to Modern English. It also allows us to fine-tune our terminology as to the most recent stage in terms of verbalized or verbal gerund, which at first sight seems to be a contradictio in terminis. In light of the data it is argued that –ing forms after verbs of perception (We saw him working in the garden) can also be interpreted as (semi-)gerunds, featuring at the extreme right of the gradient; ‘‘semi-”, because such structures lack one nominal property, viz. the genitival subject (...*his working in the garden). The historical history and development of the gerund in English can be described as a triadic process: VERB – NOUN – VERB.

Keywords

EN

gerundial; gerund; verbalization; (semi-)gerunds; genitival subject

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
• Journal: Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies
• Year: 2012
• Issue: 21/2
• Pages: 17-30

Contributors

author

Dekeyser Xavier

• Universiteit van Antwerpen
• KU Leuven

References

• Cappelle, B., and N. Wada (eds.). 2010 Distinctions in English Grammar Offered to Renaat Declerck. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
• Declerck, R. 1991. A Comprehensive Descriptive Grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
• Dekeyser, X. 1975. Number and Case Relations in 19th Century British English. A Comparative Study of Grammar and Usage. Antwerpen – Amsterdam: Uitgeverij De Nederlandsche Boekhandel.
• Dekeyser, X. 2010. The Category of the Gerund in a Diachronic Perspective. In: B. Cappelle, and N. Wada (eds.). Distinctions in English Grammar Offered to Renaat Declerck (Tokyo: Kaitakusha), 191–208.
• Dekeyser, X., B. Devriendt, G. A. J. Tops, and S. Geukens. 2008. Foundations of English Grammar. For University Students and Advanced Learners. Leuven – Amersfoort: Acco.
• Huddleston, R. 1984. Introduction to the Grammar of English. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Jespersen, O. 1965. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part V: Syntax. London: Allen & Unwin, Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.
• Lees, R. B. 1968. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. Fifth Printing. Bloomington: Indiana University, The Hague: Mouton.
• Leonard, S. A. 1929. The Doctrine of Correctness in English Usage 1700–1800. University of Wisconsin Studies in Language and Linguistics 25.
• Mustanoja, T. F. 1960. A Middle English Syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
• Visser, F. Th. 1966. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Part II. Leiden: E. J. Brill.