Tax Structures in OECD Countries – An Empirical Analysis

• Authors: Adam Adamczyk , Sławomir Franek
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Numerous studies indicate that the structure of taxation (measured by the share of revenue from individual taxes in total tax revenue) is of greater significance for economic growth than the level of fiscalism measured by the tax revenue to GDP ratio. Hence, it is reasonable to seek an answer to the question whether the tendencies occurring in tax systems of particular countries indeed reflect the plans to implement tax structures which are economic growth-friendly. Thus, the aim of the paper is to assess the influence of the changes in the OECD countries’ tax structure on economic growth. The subject of the study was OECD member states in the period of 2000–2012. The study period was selected in such a way as to include the period preceding the financial crisis, the period of the crisis, as well as the years following the crisis. In the analysis, four parameters charactering tax systems were used: the ratio of tax revenues to GDP, which describes the overall level of tax burden in the examined countries and three parameters charactering the tax revenue structure of tax systems, i.e. the share of income taxes in total tax revenue, the share of social security contributions in total tax revenue and the share of consumption taxes in total tax revenue. The main conclusions drawn on the basis of the carried out study indicate that: 1) there is no sufficient evidence that the fiscalism level measured by the tax revenue to GDP ratio has negative influence on economic growth; 2) both the high share of indirect taxes and high share of income taxes support economic growth, although consumption taxes have a stronger influence on GDP dynamics than income taxes; 3) the only group of tax burdens, which has definitely negative influence on economic growth are social security contributions, 4) in OECD countries no significant changes were observed towards the increase of the importance of growth-friendly consumption taxes.

Keywords

EN

tax systems, fiscal policy, growth-friendliness

• Publisher: Komitet Nauk o Finansach PAN
• Journal: FINANSE Czasopismo Komitetu Nauk o Finansach PAN
• Year: 2016
• Issue: 1(9)
• Pages: 61-75

Contributors

author

Adam Adamczyk

• Uniwersytet Szczeciński

author

Sławomir Franek

• Uniwersytet Szczeciński

References

• Acosta-Ormaechea, S., Yoo, J., Tax Composition and Growth: A Broad Cross-Country Perspective, „IMF Working Paper” 2012, No. 257.
• Agell, J., Ohlsson, H., Thoursie, P., Growth Effects of Government Expenditure and Taxation in Rich Countries: A Comment, „European Economic Review” 2006, No. 50(1).
• Arnold, J.M., Brys, B., Heady, C., Johansson, A., Schwellnus, C., Vartia, L., Tax Policy for Economic Recovery and Growth, „Economic Journal” 2011, No. 121(550).
• Barro, R., A Cross-Country Study of Growth, Saving, and Government, „National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper” 1989, No. 2855.
• Barro, R., Economic Growth in a Cross-Section of Countries, „Quarterly Journal of Economics” 1991, No. 104.
• Çevik, S., Domestic Saving and Tax Structure: Evidence from Turkey, „Sosyoekonomi” 2015, No. 1.
• De Mooij, R., Keen, M., Fiscal Devaluation and Fiscal Consolidation: The VAT in Troubled Times, „IMF Working Paper” 2012, No. 85.
• Easterly, W., Rebelo, S., Fiscal policy and economic growth: an empirical investigation, „NBER Working Paper” 1993, No. W4499.
• European Union, Taxation trends in the European Union. Data for the EU Member States, Iceland and Norway, Publications Office of the European Union, 2014.
• European Commission, Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Tax reforms in EU Member States: Tax policy challenges for economic growth and fiscal sustainability, „European Economy” 2013, No. 5.
• European Commission, Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Tax reforms in EU Member States: Tax policy challenges for economic growth and fiscal sustainability, „European Economy” 2011, No. 6.
• European Commission, Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Public Finances in EMU 2010, „European Economy” 2010, No. 4.
• Gemmell, N., Kneller, R., Sanz I., Fiscal Policy Impacts on Growth in the OECD: Are They Long- or Short-Term?, University of Nottingham, 2006.
• Keen, M., Tax policy for Consolidation and Growth, in: Princen, S., Mourre, G. (eds.), The role of tax policy in times of fiscal consolidation, „European Economy Economic Paper” 2013, No. 502.
• Johansson, Å., Heady, C., Arnold, J., Brys, B., Vartia, L., Tax and Economic Growth. Working Paper, OECD Economics Department, OECD Publishing, 2008, No. 620.
• Kneller, R., Bleaney M.F., Gemmell, N., Fiscal Policy and Growth: Evidence from OECD Countries, „Journal of Public Economics” 1999, No. 74.
• Lee, Y., Gordon R.H., Tax structure and economic growth, „Journal of Public Economics” 2005, No. 89.
• Lucas, R.E., On the Mechanics of Economic Development, „Journal of Monetary Economics” 1998, No. 22.
• OECD, Tax Policy Reform and Economic Growth, „OECD Tax Policy Studies” 2010, No. 20.
• Roeger, W., In’t Veld, J., Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Fiscal stimulus and exit strategies in the EU: a model-based analysis, „European Economy Economic Paper” 2010, No. 426.
• Solow, R.M., Growth Theory: an Exposition, Oxford University Press, 1970.
• Ward, J.H., Jr., Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function, „Journal of the American Statistical Association” 1963, No. 58.
• Widmalm, F., Tax structure and growth: are some taxes better than others?, „Public Choice” 2001, No. 107(3/4).
• Wöhlbier, F., Astarita, C., Mourre, G., Consolidation on the revenue side and growth--friendly tax structures: an indicator based approach, „European Economy. Economic Papers” 2014, No. 513.
• Xing, J., Does tax structure affect economic growth? Empirical evidence from OECD countries, Centre for Business Taxation, 2011.