Forever (Un)stable Regimes? The Comparison of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan

• Authors: Peter Plenta

Title variants

PL

Wiecznie (nie)stabilne systemy? Porównanie Kazachstanu i Kirgistanu

• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan are following different trajectories in terms of stability and leadership. On the one hand, the Kazakh president, Nazarbayev, successfully manages issues within the country, on the other hand Kyrgyzstan has fallen into a period of protests, revolutions and instability in 2005–2010. The article focuses on three dimensions in order to explain this difference: political performance, economic performance and security performance. Despite a huge contrast in economic conditions, Kyrgyz presidents could be successful in maintaining their positions. However, the use of similar tools like in Kazakhstan in political and security areas failed because of state-building effort almost in the whole history of independent Kyrgyzstan.

PL

Drogi przemian politycznych, stabilności i przywództwa są różne w przypadku Kazachstanu i Kirgistanu. Z jednej strony, prezydent Kazachstanu N. Nazarbajew z powodzeniem poradził sobie ze skalą problemów dotykających jego państwo, z drugiej strony, w latach 2005-2010 Kirgistan znalazł się na etapie protestów, rewolucji i niestabilności. W celu wyjaśnienia różnic między systemami politycznymi tych dwóch państw, autor skupia się w niniejszym artykule na trzech wymiarach: politycznym, ekonomicznym i poziomie bezpieczeństwa. Pomimo ogromnej różnicy ekonomicznej między tymi państwami, prezydenci Kirgistanu mogą być postrzegani jako skuteczni w utrzymywaniu swojej pozycji. Jednak, mimo korzystania z podobnych narzędzi (zasobów) – jak w Kazachstanie – w kwestiach politycznych i bezpieczeństwa, niemal w całej historii niepodległego Kirgistanu budowa efektywnego państwa nie została zrealizowana w sposób pomyślny.

Keywords

EN

Kazakhstan; Kyrgyzstan; political institutions; economy; security

PL

Kazachstan; Kirgistan; instytucje polityczne; gospodarka; bezpieczeństwo

• Publisher: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
• Journal: Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 7(43)
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 23-42

Contributors

author

Peter Plenta

• International University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

References

• Abazov R., The Political Culture of Central Asia: A Case of Kyrgyzstan, March 2003, Accessed October 21, 2014, <http://mercury.ethz.ch/ serviceengine/Files/ISN/44057/ ichaptersection_singledocument/ba79d7dd-6c34-47b8-9770-73aaf6738f3a/en/06.pdf>.
• Akbarzadeh S., Keeping Central Asia Stable, “Third World Quarterly”, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2004, pp. 689-705.
• Akerman E., Democratisation in Central Asia: Communism to Clanism, “Conflict, Security & Development”, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2002, pp. 133-144.
• Alkan H., Post-Soviet Politics in Kyrgyzstan: Between Centralism and Localism?, “Contemporary Politics”, Vol. 15, No. 3, September 2009, pp.355-375.
• Bowyer A.C., Parliament and Political Parties in Kazakhstan, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute – Silk Road Studies Program, April 2008, Accessed October 22, 2014, <http://www.silkroadstudies.org/new/docs/Silkroadpapers/0804Bowyer.pdf>.
• Cheterian V., Kyrgyzstan: Central Asia's Island of Instability, “Survival”. Global Politics and Strategy, Vol. 52, No. 5, October-November 2010, pp.21-27.
• Cohen A., Kazakhstan: The Road to Independence. Energy Policy and the Birth of Nation, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute – Silk Road Studies Program, April 2008, Accessed October 20, 2014, <http://www.isdp.eu/images/stories/isdp-main-pdf/2008_cohen_ kazakhstan_ the_road_to_independence.pdf>.
• Collins K., Kyrgyzstan's Latest Revolution, “Journal of Democracy”, Vol. 22, No. 3, July 2011, pp. 150-164.
• Cummings S.N., Power and Change in Central Asia, London–New York: Routledge 2002.
• Cummings S.N., Kazakhstan Power and the Elite, London–New York: I.B. Tauris 2005.
• Dzuraev S., Governance Challenges in Post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan: The Externalization and Parochialization of Political Legitimacy, 2012, Accessed October 21, 2014, <http:// www.google.sk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CB4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nupi.no%2Fcontent%2Fdownload%2F284218%2F992494%2Ffile%2FGovernance%2520Challenges%2520in%2520PostSoviet%2520Kyrgyzstan%2C%2520Dzhuraev% 2520S.pdf&ei=KGXHU87jMIWs0QWTyoCAAg&usg=AFQjCNGqOYLA6mqEoaRdzvBDNe 1c HMP_TQ&sig2=WXl8mOFyoSU7uXKf5PO-Pw&bvm=bv.71198958,d. bGQ&cad=rja>.
• Engvall J., Kyrgyzstan's Revolt: Prospects for Stability in aFailing State, CACI Analyst, 14.04.2010, Accessed October 23, 2014, <http://old.cacianalyst.org/?q=node/5307>.
• Engvall J., Flirting with State Failure: Power and Politics in Kyrgyzstan since Independence, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute – Silk Road Studies Program, April 2011, Accessed October 21, 2014, <http://www.silkroadstudies.org/new/docs/silkroadpapers/1107Engvall.pdf>.
• Franke A., Gawrich A., Autocratic Stability and Post-Soviet Rentierism: The Cases of Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan, 2011, Accessed October 20, 2014, <https://www.academia.edu/1965766/Autocratic_Stability_and_Post-Soviet_Rentierism_the_Cases_of_Azerbaijan_and_Kazakhstan>.
• Frigeiro A., Kassenova N., Central Asia: Contemporary Security Challenges and Sources of State Resilience, “Security and Human Rights”, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2013, pp. 123-135.
• Gleason G.M., Central Asia: State Building in the Face of Insurgent Islam, [in:] A.J. Tellis, M. Wills (eds.), Strategic Asia 2004-05: Confronting Terrorism in the Pursuit of Power, Seattle, WA: The National Bureau of Asian Research 2004, pp. 199-226.
• Gürbüz Y.E, Kyrgyzstan: In Search for Stability, “Insight Turkey”, Vol. 15, No. 4, Fall 2013, pp. 191-205.
• Heinrich A., The Formal Political System in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. ABackground Study, March 2010, Accessed October 21, 2014, <http://www.forschungsstelle.uni-bremen. de/UserFiles/file/06-Publikationen/Arbeitspapiere/fsoap107.pdf>.
• Isaacs R., `Papa' – Nursultan Nazarbayev and the Discourse of Charismatic Leadership and Nation-Building in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan, “Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism”, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2010, pp. 435-452.
• Isaacs R., Party System Formation in Kazakhstan. Between Formal and Informal Politics, London–New York: Routledge 2011.
• Juraev S., Back on Track? Kyrgyz Authoritarianism after the Tulip Revolution, PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, No. 95, March 2010, Accessed October 23, 2014, <http://www. ponarseurasia.org/sites/default/files/policy-memos-pdf/pepm_095.pdf>.
• Kupatadze A., Organized Crime before and after the Tulip Revolution: The Changing Dynamics of Upperworld-Underworld Networks, “Central Asian Survey”, Vol. 27, No. 3-4, 2008, pp. 279-299.
• Marat E., Bakiyev, the Security Structures, and the April 7 Violence in Kyrgyzstan, CACI Analyst, 28.04.2010, Accessed October 22, 2014, <http://old.cacianalyst.org/?q=node/5316>.
• Matveeva A., Kyrgyzstan in Crisis: Permanent Revolution and the Curse of Nationalism, Crisis States Working Papers, Series No. 2, September 2010, Accessed October 21, 2014,
• ment/53ebff58-dae8-4f47-90fa-c7d6649ae4d1/en/WP79.2.pdf>.
• Ostrovy stability a nestability v Strednej Ázii: Komparácia Kazachstanu aKirgizska, “Pretrvanie azmeny režimov v Severnej Afrike, na Blízkom východe avStrednej Ázii”, Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo UK 2014.
• Rahmetov A., Kazakhstan's Presidential Elections 2011: Nazarbayev Postpones Succession, “ISPI Analysis”, No. 51, May 2011, Accessed October 21, 2014, <http://www.ispionline. it/it/documents/Analysis_51_2011.pdf>.
• Way L., Resistance to Contagion: Sources of Authoritarian Stability in the Former Soviet Union, [in:] V. Bunce, M. McFaul, K. Stoner-Weiss (eds.), Democracy and Authoritarianism in the Postcommunist World, Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press 2010, pp. 229-252.
• World Bank, GNI per capita, 2014, Accessed October 21, 2014, <http://data.worldbank.org/ indicator/NY.GNP.PCAP.PP.CD>.

Identifiers

DOI

10.18290/rns.2015.7(43).1-3