Online qualitative research in immigrant communities: opportunities and challenges during the pandemic

• Authors: Andrejuk Katarzyna
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Internet-based qualitative methods have quickly transitioned from a niche to mass research strategy. The aim of the article is to describe the opportunities and challenges of online research, with a focus on in-depth interviews through video communication tools such as Zoom, Skype and Face Time. The analysis encompasses various dimensions of internet-based research: recruitment, conducting empirical study, analysis, and archiving. Online qualitative methods may be particularly useful in studying immigrant populations, due to a high level of internet skills among immigrants and their familiarity with online video communication resulting from their everyday transnational activities. Online research may translate into the increased visibility of low-cost projects, and broaden the academic autonomy of junior researchers, thus enhancing the diversification of empirical, theoretical, and methodological approaches. Conducting online interviews also improves the quality of archived material, due to the access to both sound and visual recording. The text emphasizes the advantages of the hybrid approach to qualitative research through combining online and offline interviews, and online and offline participant observation. The author refers to experiences of data collection for a study of Polish migrant entrepreneurs in the UK.

Keywords

EN

internet-based interviews; online interviews; Zoom and Skype interviews; internet-based qualitative research; digitalization of qualitative research

• Publisher: Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: ASK. Research and Methods
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 29
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 55-73

Contributors

author

Andrejuk Katarzyna

References

• Alam, Khorshed and Sophia Imran, (2015),”The digital divide and social inclusion among refugee migrants: A case in regional Australia”, Information Technology & People, Vol. 28 Iss 2 pp. 344-365. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2014-0083
• Archibald Mandy M. (2016), Investigator Triangulation: A Collaborative Strategy With Potential for Mixed Methods Research, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Vol 10, Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815570092
• Archibald, M.M., Ambagtsheer, R.C., Casey, M.G., Lawless, M. (2019), Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 18: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596
• Alencar Amanda (2020), Mobile communication and refugees: An analytical review of academic literature, “Sociology Compass”, vo. 14(8). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12802
• Paolo Boccagni (2020), Multi-Sited Ethnography, edited by: Paul Atkinson, Sara Delamont, Alexandru Cernat, Joseph W. Sakshaug & Richard A. Williams Bos Nathan, Erika Shehan Poole, Kyratso George Karahalios, John Charles Thomas, Marcela Musgrove-Chavez, Sarita Yardi (2009), Research ethics in the facebook era: Privacy, anonymity, and oversight. https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520402
• Hamilton Rebekah, Barbara J. Bowers (2006), Internet Recruitment and E-Mail Interviews in Qualitative Studies, Qualitative Health Research 16(6):821-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306287599
• Carling Jørgen, Marta Bivand Erdal, Rojan Ezzati (2014), Beyond the insider–outsider divide in migration research, Migration Studies, Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnt022
• Denzin Norman K. (1978), The Research Act: ATheoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods, Routledge.
• Faist Thomas, Margit Fauser, Eveline Reisenauer (2013) Transnational Migration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Fosslien L., M. West Duffy (2020), How to combat zoom fatigue, Harvard Business Review.
• Gray, Lia M; Wong-Wylie, Gina; Rempel, Gwen R; Cook, Karen (2020), Expanding Qualitative Research Interviewing Strategies: Zoom Video Communications, The Qualitative Report; volume 25, number 5, (May 2020): 1292-1301.
• Guthrie Susan, Daniela Rodriguez Rincon, Gordon McInroy, Becky Ioppolo, Salil Gunashekar (2019), Measuring bias, burden and conservatism in research funding processes, F1000Research 2019, 8:851.https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19156.1
• Helsper, Ellen J., Reisdorf, Bianca C. (2016), The emergence of a “digital underclass” in Great Britain and Sweden: changing reasons for digital exclusion. “New Media & Society”. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816634676
• James, Nalita, Busher, Hugh (2012) Internet Interviewing, J. Gubrium, J. Holstein, A. Marvasti K. McKinney (eds) Handbook of Interview Research, 2nd edition, New York: Sage
• Janghorban Roksana, Robab Latifnejad Roudsari & Ali Taghipour (2014) Skype interviewing: The new generation of online synchronous interview in qualitative research, International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 9:1, 24152. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.24152
• Jenner Brandy M., Kit C. Myers (2019), Intimacy, rapport, and exceptional disclosure: a comparison of in-person and mediated interview contexts, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, Volume 22, Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1512694
• Johnson David, Christopher P. Scheitle, Elaine Howard Ecklund (2019), Beyond the In-Person Interview? How Interview Quality Varies Across In-person, Telephone, and Skype Interviews, “Social Science Computer Review”. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319893612
• Kathrin Kissau, Uwe Hunger (2010), The internet as a means of studying transnationalism and diaspora, in: Rainer Bauböck, Thomas Faist (ed.), Diaspora and Transnationalism: Concepts, Theories and Methods, IMISCOE Research Series, Amsterdam University Press, pp. 245-266.
• Kazmer Michelle M. & Bo Xie (2008), Qualitative Interviewing In Internet Studies: Playing With The Media, Playing With The Method, Information, Communication & Society, Volume 11, 2008 - Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801946333
• Konecki Krzysztof T. (2008), Triangulation and Dealing with The Realness of Qualitative Research, Qualitative Sociology Review, Volume IV, Issue 3.
• Krouwel Matthew, Kate Jolly & Sheila Greenfield (2019), Comparing Skype (video calling) and in-person qualitative interview modes in a study of people with irritable bowel syndrome – an exploratory comparative analysis, BMC Medical Research Methodology volume 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0867-9
• Kutscher Nadia, Lisa-Marie Kreß (2016), ‘Internet is the same like food’ – An empirical study on the use of digital media by unaccompanied minor refugees in Germany, “Transnational Social Review. A Social Work Journal”, Vol. 6(1-2), p. 200-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2016.1184819
• Lo Iacono Valeria, Paul Symonds, David H.K. Brown (2016), Skype as a Tool for Qualitative Research Interviews, Sociological Research Online Volume: 21 issue: 2, page(s): 103-117. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3952
• Maitland Carleen, Xu Ying (2015, March). A social informatics analysis of refugee mobile phone use: A case study of Za’atari Syrian refugee camp. TPRC 43: The 43rd Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2588300
• Mann Chris, Fiona Stewart (2000), Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209281
• Meho Lokman I. (2006), E-Mail Interviewing in Qualitative Research: A Methodological Discussion. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20416
• Mirick, Rebecca G., Wladkowski, Stephanie P. (2019). Skype in Qualitative Interviews: Participant and Researcher Perspectives. The Qualitative Report, 24(12), 3061-3072. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol24/iss12/9
• Nehls Kimberly, Brandy D. Smith, Holly A. Schneider (2015), Video-Conferencing Interviews as a Data Collection Method, In: Enhancing Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research with Technology. (pp.140-157), IGI-Global Publishing, Editors: Shalin Hai-Jew. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6493-7.ch006
• O’Connor Henrietta, Clare Madge (2003), “Focus groups in cyberspace”: Using the Internet for qualitative research, Qualitative Market Research, volume 6(2): 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750310470190
• Pedro J. Oiarzabal, Ulf-Dietrich Reips (2012): Migration and Diaspora in the Age of Information and Communication Technologies, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38:9,1333-1338. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2012.698202
• Reips, Ulf-Dietrich (2008). How Internet-mediated research changes science. In A. Barak (Ed.), Psychological aspects of cyberspace: Theory, research, applications (p. 268–294). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813740.013
• Richter Alexander (2020), Locked-down digital work, International Journal of Information Management, Volume 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102157
• Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543
• Salmons Janet (2014), Qualitative Online Interviews: Strategies, Design, and Skills, Sage Publications.
• Sipes Jessica, Lynne Diane Roberts, Barbara Mullan (2019), Voice-only Skype for use in researching sensitive topics: a research note, Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1577518
• Smets Kevin (2018), The way Syrian refugees in Turkey use media: Understanding “connected refugees” through a non-media-centric and local approach. Communications, vol. 43(1), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0041
• Stieger Stefan, Anja S. Göritz (2006), Using instant messaging for Internet-based interviews, CyberPsychology & Behavior, vol. 9, number 5. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.552
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
• Sullivan, Jessica R. (2012) “Skype: An Appropriate Method of Data Collection for Qualitative Interviews?,” The Hilltop Review: Vol. 6 : Iss. 1 , Article 10.
• Symonds, V., Symonds, P., & Brown, D. H. K. (2016). Skype as a Tool for Qualitative Research Interviews. Sociological Research Online, 21(2), [12]. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3952
• Vertovec Steven (2009), Transnationalism, London, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927083
• Wall, M., Campbell, M., & Janbek, D. (2017). Syrian refugees and information precarity. New Media & Society, 19(2), 240–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815591967
• Weller Susie (2017), Using internet video calls in qualitative (longitudinal) interviews: some implications for rapport, Volume 20, 2017 - Issue 6. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1269505
• Witteborn Saskia (2018). The digital force in forced migration: Imagined affordances and gendered practices. Popular Communication, vol. 16(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2017.1412442
• Wiederhold Brenda K. (2020), Connecting Through Technology During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: Avoiding ‘‘Zoom Fatigue’’, “Cyberpsychology, Behavior, And Social Networking”, Volume 23, Number 7, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.29188.bkw
• Wilkerson J. Michael, Alex Iantaffi, Jeremy A. Grey, Walter O. Bockting, B. R. Simon Rosser (2014), Recommendations for Internet-Based Qualitative Health Research With Hard-to-Reach Populations, Qualitative Health Research 2014 Apr; 24(4): 561–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314524635
• Wittel Andreas (2000), Ethnography on the Move: From Field to Net to Internet, “Forum: Qualitative Social Research”, Volume 1, No. 1, Art. 21.
• Wylegała Anna (2013), Badacz z Polski na Ukrainie: problemy metodologiczne, „Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej” issue IX(4).