Education reform and inequality: fifteen years of new lower secondary schools in Poland

• Authors: Sawiński Zbigniew
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Inequalities in education are so deeply embedded in social stratification that even far-reaching school reforms are not able to weaken the influence of social origin on school achievements. The aim of this article is to verify whether the education reform, which in Poland established a new type of 3-year lower secondary school (gimnazjum), simultaneously equalised the chances of students from different social backgrounds at the transition from lower to upper secondary school. All hypotheses were tested using PISA data from the years 2000–2012, which covered the period before and after school reform in Poland. In case of the first hypothesis, which concerned changes in the impact of social origin on student’s performance in the last year of the new schools, i.e. a year before transition to upper secondary school, PISA data clearly demonstrated that after the reform, there was no significant decrease in correlations between socio-economic status of students and their results in three PISA domains: mathematics, reading and science. In case of the second hypothesis, which was directly focused on social selections to upper secondary schools, PISA data did not confirm that anything changed in this respect after the reform. The third hypotheses addresses the problem of the growing differences among schools in terms of their performance. During the fifteen years since the reform, new schools started to diversify more and more, especially in large cities. PISA demonstrates, however, that this diversification did not perpetuate social inequalities, but rather resulted from competition among schools in the quality of instruction. The latter result was supported by PISA data from eight European countries where students, as in Poland, attend schools which are not divided into tracks. Between 2003 and 2012, growing differences among schools was observed in most of these countries, but in none of them was it accompanied by growing inequalities in education.

Keywords

EN

sociology of education; inequality; education reform; lower secondary schools; PISA

• Publisher: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych
• Journal: Edukacja
• Year: 2017
• Issue: 2(2017)
• Pages: 146–163

Contributors

author

Sawiński Zbigniew

• Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences

References

• Boudon, R. (1974). Education, inequality, and social opportunity. New York: Wiley.
• Brunello, G. and Checchi, D. (2006). Does school tracking affect equality of opportunity? New international evidence. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2348. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.
• Coleman, J. S. et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington: U. S. Government Printing Office.
• Dolata, R., Jasińska, A. and Modzelewski, M. (2012). Wykorzystanie krajowych egzaminów jako instrumentu polityki oświatowej na przykładzie różnicowania się gimnazjów w dużych miastach. Polityka Społeczna, 1(Numer tematyczny), 41–46.
• Domański, H. and Tomescu-Dubrow, I. (forthcoming). Determinants of educational inequality before and after the systemic change. In I. Tomescu-Dubrow, K. M. Słomczyński, H. Domański, J. K. Dubrow, Z. Sawiński and D. Przybysz (eds.), Dynamics of class and stratification in Poland. Budapest: Central European University.
• Duncan, B. (1967). Education and social background. American Journal of Sociology, 72(4), 363–372.
• Erickson, R. and Rudolphi, F. (2010). Change in social selection to upper secondary school – primary and secondary effects in Sweden. European Sociological Review, 26(3), 291–305.
• Gamoran, A. (2009). Tracking and inequality: new directions for research and practice. WCER Working Paper No. 2009-6. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Educational Research.
• Główny Urząd Statystyczny (2007). Oświata i wychowanie w roku szkolnym 2006/2007. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
• Główny Urząd Statystyczny (2008). Szkoły wyższe i ich finanse w 2008 roku. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
• Główny Urząd Statystyczny (2014). Oświata i wychowanie w roku szkolnym 2013/2014. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
• Halsey, A. H., Heath, A. F. and Ridge, J. M. (1980). Origins and destinations. Family, class, and education in modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Haman, J. (2008). Wpływ statusu społeczno-ekonomicznego na wyniki w testach PISA 2000 i 2003. In M. Federowicz (ed.), Umiejętności polskich gimnazjalistów. Pomiar, wyniki, zadania testowe z komentarzami (pp. 78–86). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.
• Hanushek, E. A. and Woessmann, L. (2006). Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. The Economic Journal, 116(510), C63–C76.
• Hauser, R. M. and Featherman, D. L. (1976). Equality of schooling: trends and prospects. Sociology of Education, 49(2), 99–120.
• Heath, A. F. and Clifford, P. (1990). Class inequalities in education in the twentieth century. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 153(Series A), 1–16.
• Heckman, J. J. and Kautz, T. (2014). Fostering and measuring skills: interventions that improve character and cognition. In J. J. Heckman, J. E. Humphries and T. Kautz (eds.), The myth of achievement tests: the GED and the role of character in American life (pp. 341–430). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Herczyński, J. and Sobotka, A. (2017). Organisational models of gymnasium in Poland. Edukacja, 141(2), 5–31.
• Holm, A., Jæger, M. M., Karlson, K. B. and Reimer, D. (2013). Incomplete equalization: the effect of tracking in secondary education on educational inequality. Social Science Research, 42(6), 1431–1442.
• Kendall, M. G. and Stuart, A. (1979). The advanced theory of statistics (vol. 2: Inference and relationship, 4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
• Kerr, S. P., Pekkarinen, T. and Uusitalo, R. (2013). School tracking and development of cognitive skills. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(3), 577–602.
• Lucas, S. R. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: education, transitions, track mobility, and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1643–1690.
• Ministerstwo Edukacji Narodowej (1998a). Reforma systemu edukacji (projekt). Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne.
• Ministerstwo Edukacji Narodowej (1998b). O sieci szkół. Biblioteczka Reformy, 2. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Edukacji Narodowej.
• OECD (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world. First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• OECD (2010). PISA 2009 Results: what makes a school successful? Resources, policies and practices (vol. 4). Paris: OECD Publishing.
• OECD (2011). Lessons from PISA for the United States. Strong performers and successful reformers in education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• OECD (2013). PISA 2012 Results. [Database.] DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932964908
• OECD (2014). PISA 2012 technical Report. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• Pekkarinen, T., Uusitalo, R. and Kerr, S. P. (2009). School tracking and international income mobility: evidence from the Finnish comprehensive school reform. Journal of Public Economics, 93(7–8), 965–973.
• Putkiewicz, E. and Zahorska, M. (eds.). (1998). Uwagi i propozycje do projektu reformy systemu edukacji. Warszawa: Instytut Spraw Publicznych.
• Raudenbush, S. and Bryk, A. S. (1986). A hierarchical model for studying school effects. Sociology of Education, 59(1), 1–17.
• Sawiński, Z. (forthcoming). Systemic changes and inequality in access to education, 1972–2008. In I. Tomescu-Dubrow, K. M. Słomczyński, H. Domański, J. K. Dubrow, Z. Sawiński and D. Przybysz (red.), Dynamics of class and stratification in Poland. Budapest: Central European University.
• Shavit, Y. and Blossfeld, H.-P. (eds.). (1993). Persistent inequality: changing educational attainment in thirteen countries. Boulder: Westview.
• Shavit, Y., Arum, R., Gamoran, A. and Menahem, G. (eds.). (2007). Stratification in higher education: a comparative study. Stanford: Stanford University Press
• Simkus, A. and Andorka, R. (1982). Inequalities in educational attainment in Hungary. American Sociological Review, 47(6), 740–751.
• Tieben, N. and Wolbers, M. (2010). Success and failure in secondary education: socio-economic background effects on secondary school outcome in the Netherlands, 1927–1998. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(3), 277–290.
• World Bank (2015). The World Bank indicators: Gini index (World Bank estimate). Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI/countries?display=default
• Zawistowska, A. (2012). Horyzontalne nierówności edukacyjne we współczesnej Polsce. Warszawa: Scholar.

Notes

EN

http://www.edukacja.ibe.edu.pl/images/numery/2017/2-9-sawinski-educational-reform-and-inequality.pdf

Identifiers

DOI

10.24131/3724.170209