Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2017 | 22 | 30-45

Article title

A Lexical Study of Comparisons with Typical Brand Users of Goods

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The article proposes a methodological framework of psycholexical studies, derived from personality theory, as a reliable base for the extraction of universal dimensions of self-image congruence. The aim of our study was to explore the psycholexical structure of a lexicon of comparisons made by Polish consumers of goods when comparing themselves to typical brand users of particular goods. The consumer lexicon was compiled as a result of 586 individual interviews with respondents aged 13 to 82 (M = 36,6; SD = 16,9), 51.8% of whom were females. The study involved 294 brands representing 29 categories of goods. The lexicon of 17,075 attributes of typical brand users was classified by 13 judges according to the classification system adopted from German lexical studies. Judicial decisions underwent psychometric verification in the aspect of their validity and internal reliability; they were found satisfactory. The results of judicial classifications were demonstrated in the aspect of desirable, similar, and undesirable attributes in the consumers’ self-concept, and discussed with reference to the structure of a person-descriptive lexicon in the Polish language. The results showed that consumers observe both positive and negative attributes in typical brand users and over a half of all the attributes of consumers are personality descriptors. The study allowed us to extract a high-frequency list of consumer descriptors that can be applied in quantitative self-image congruence research.

Year

Issue

22

Pages

30-45

Physical description

Dates

published
2017

Contributors

  • University of Zielona Góra
  • University of Zielona Góra
  • University of Warsaw
author
  • John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin

References

  • Aaker, D.A. (1996), Measuring brand equity across products and markets. In: California Management Review 38(3), 102–120.
  • Aguirre-Rodriguez, A./ M. Bosnjak / M.J. Sirgy (2012), Moderators of the selfcongruity effect on consumer decision-making: A meta-analysis. In: Journal of Business Research 65(8), 1179–1188.
  • Ahuvia, A.C. (2005), Beyond the extended self: Loved objects and consumers’ identity narratives. In: Journal of Consumer Research 32(1), 171–184.
  • Alicke, M. D./ C. Sedikides (2009), Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. In: European Review of Social Psychology 20(1), 1–48.
  • Allport, G.W./ H.S. Odbert (1936), Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. In: Psychological Monographs 47(1), 1–171.
  • Angle, J./ M. Forehand (2011), A unified theory of consumer response to self-threat. In: D.W. Dahl/ G.V. Johar/ S.M.J. van Osselaer (eds), Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 38. Duluth, 64–65.
  • Angleitner A./ F. Ostendorf/ O.P. John (1990), Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German: A psycho‐lexical study. In: European Journal of Personality 4(2), 89–118.
  • Avis, M. (2012), Brand personality factor based models: A critical review. In: Australasian Marketing Journal 20(1), 89–96.
  • Banister, E.N./ M.K. Hogg (2004), Negative symbolic consumption and consumers’ drive for self-esteem: the case of the fashion industry. In: European Journal of Marketing 38(7), 850–868.
  • Bosnjak, M./ C. Brand (2008), The impact of undesired self-image congruence on consumption-related attitudes and intentions. In: International Journal of Management 25(4), 673–683.
  • Chernev, A./ R. Hamilton/ D. Gal (2011), Competing for consumer identity: Limits to self-expression and the perils of lifestyle branding. In: Journal of Marketing 75(3), 66–82.
  • De Raad, B./ A.A. Hendriks/ W.K. Hofstee (1992), Towards a refined structure of personality traits. In: European Journal of Personality 6(4), 301–319.
  • De Raad, B./ D.P. Barelds (2008), A new taxonomy of Dutch personality traits based on a comprehensive and unrestricted list of descriptors. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94(2), 347–364.
  • Di Blas, L./ M. Forzi (1999), Refining a descriptive structure of personality attributes in the Italian language: The abridged Big Three circumplex structure. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76(3), 451–481.
  • Dubisz, S. (Ed.) (2008). Uniwersalny słownik języka polskiego. Warszawa.
  • Escalas, J.E./ J.R. Bettman (2015), Brand relationships and self-identity: consumer use of celebrity meaning to repair a compromised identity. In: M. Breazeale/S. Fournier/ J. Avery (eds), Strong Brands, Strong Relationships. London, 81–94.
  • Galton, F. (1884), Measurement of character. In: Fortnightly Review 36, 179–185.
  • Gilmore, A. (2006), Usługi—marketing i zarządzanie. Warszawa.
  • Goldberg, L.R. (1981), Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In: Review of Personality and Social Psychology 2(2), 141–165.
  • Goldberg, L.R. (1982), From Ace to Zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. In: C.D. Spielberger/ J.N. Butcher (eds), Advances in Personality Assessment, Vol. 1. Hillsdale, 203–234.
  • Goldberg, L.R. (1990), An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(6), 1216–1229.
  • Gorbaniuk, O./ A. Budzińska/ M. Owczarek/ E. Bożek/ K. Juros (2013), The factor structure of Polish personality-descriptive adjectives: An alternative psycholexical study. In: European Journal of Personality 27(3), 304–318.
  • Gorbaniuk, O./ E. Czarnecka/ M. Chmurzyńska (2011), Taxonomy of persondescriptive terms in Polish: A psycho-lexical study. In: Current Problems of Psychiatry 12(1), 100–106.
  • Gorbaniuk, O./ M. Dudek (2016). Właściwości psychometryczne kwestionariusza do pomiaru wizerunku konsumenta, In: Psychologiczne Zeszyty Naukowe 1(1), 1–16.
  • Graeff, T.R. (1996), Using promotional messages to manage the effects of brand and self-image on brand evaluations. In: Journal of Consumer Marketing 13(3), 4–18.
  • Grubb, E.L./ H.L. Grathwohl (1967), Consumer self-concept, symbolism and market behavior: A theoretical approach. In: The Journal of Marketing 31(4), 22–27.
  • Hogg, M.K./ E.N. Banister (2001), Dislikes, distastes and the undesired self: conceptualising and exploring the role of the undesired end state in consumer exprience. In: Journal of Marketing Management 17(1-2), 73–104.
  • Hollenbeck, C.R./ A.M. Kaikati (2012), Consumers’ use of brands to reflect their actual and ideal selves on Facebook. In: International Journal of Research in Marketing 29(4), 395–405.
  • Hosany, S./ D. Martin (2012), Self-image congruence in consumer behavior. In: Journal of Business Research 65(5), 685–691.
  • Hřebíčková, M. (2007), The lexical approach to personality description in the Czech context. In: Czechoslovak psychology, Supplement 51, 50–61.
  • Johar, J.S./ M.J. Sirgy (1991), Value-expressive versus utilitarian advertising appeals: When and why to use which appeal. In: Journal of Advertising 20(3), 23–33.
  • Lee, K./ M.C. Ashton (2004), Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. In: Multivariate Behavioral Research 39(2), 329–358.
  • McCrae, R.R./ P.X. Costa (1987), Validation of the Five-Factor Model of personality across instruments and observers. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(1), 81–90.
  • McEwen, W.J. (2005), Married to the Brand: Why Consumers Bond With Some Brands for Life. Princeton, NJ.
  • Mlačić, B./ F. Ostendorf (2005), Taxonomy and structure of Croatian personality‐descriptive adjectives. In: European Journal of Personality 19(2), 117–152.
  • Munichor, N./ Y. Steinhart (2016), Saying no to the glow: When consumers avoid arrogant brands. In: Journal of Consumer Psychology 2(26), 179–192.
  • Musante, M.D./ D.C. Bojanic/ J. Zhang (2008), A modified brand personality scale for the restaurant industry. In: Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing 16(4), 303–323.
  • Norman, W.T. (1967), 2,800 personality trait descriptors: Normative operating characteristics for a university population. Ann Arbor: Department of Psychology, University of Michigan; Research Rep. Nr 08310-1-T.
  • Park, C.W./ B.J. Jaworski/ D.J. Maclnnis (1986), Strategic brand concept-image management. In: The Journal of Marketing 50(4), 135–145.
  • Peabody, D./ L.R. Goldberg (1989), Some determinants of factor structures from personality-trait descriptors. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57(3), 552–567.
  • Rosch, E./ B. Mervis/ W.D. Gray/ D.M. Johnson/ P. Bayes-Braem (1976), Basic objects in natural categories. In: Cognitive Psychology 8, 382–439.
  • Saucier, G. (1997), Effects of variable selection on the factor structure of person descriptors. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73(6), 1296–1312.
  • Saucier, G./ L.R. Goldberg (1996), The language of personality: Lexical perspectives. In: J.S. Wiggins (ed.), The Five-Factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives. New York, 21–50.
  • Saucier, G./ S. Srivastava (2015), What makes a good structural model of personality? Evaluating the Big Five and alternatives. In: M. Mikulincer/ Ph. R. Shaver/ M. L. Cooper, R. J. Larsen (eds), APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 4: Personality Processes and Individual Differences. Washington, DC., 283–305.
  • Siguaw, J.A./ A. Mattila/ J.R. Austin (1999), The brand-personality scale. In: Cornell Hospitality Quarterly 40(3), 48–55.
  • Sirgy, M.J. (1982), Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. In: Journal of Consumer Research 9(3), 287–300.
  • Sirgy, M.J./ J.S. Johar/ A.C. Samli/ C.B. Claiborne (1991), Self-congruity versus functional congruity: Predictors of consumer behavior. In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 19(4), 363–375.
  • Stokburger-Sauer, N.E./ S. Rathneshwar/ S. Sen (2013), Drivers of consumer-brand identification. In: International Journal of Research in Marketing 29, 406–418.
  • Swann, W.B. Jr./ P.J. Rentfrow/ J.S. Guinn (2003), Self-verification: The search for coherence. In: M.R. Leary/ J.P. Tangney (eds), Handbook of self and identity. New York, 367–383.
  • Szarota, P./ M.C. Ashton/ K. Lee (2007), Taxonomy and structure of the Polish personality lexicon. In: European Journal of Personality 21(6), 823–852.
  • Wicklund, R.A./ P.M. Gollwitzer (1981), Symbolic self-completion, attempted influence, and self-deprecation. In: Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2(2), 89–114.
  • Zadeh, L.A. (1965), Fuzzy sets. In: Information and Control 8(3), 338–353.
  • Zinkhan, G.M./ J.W. Hong (1991), Self-concept and advertising effectiveness: A conceptual model of congruency conspicuousness, and response mode. In: Advances in Consumer Research 18, 348–354.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

ISSN
2080-4814

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-390b311c-bb65-4a64-9194-e923656b8497
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.