Čínská literárnost: pojem a téma

• Authors: Král Oldřich

Title variants

EN

Chinese Literariness: Concept and Theme

• Languages of publication: CS

Abstracts

EN

The works of critics as dissimilar, in almost every other respect, as Shklovsky, Tynianov, Vodicka, Paul de Man, etc. show the usefulness of “comparative approach” to the general concept of “literariness”, however heterogeneously it may be put to work. The author of the essay argues that the distinction Literariness vs. Literature corresponds with the idea of autonomous worlds of literariness from the typological point of view in the global inequality; it presents the field of “comparative literature” as a way of reading and re-reading in unexpected ways of devices and vices. Chinese literariness as a typological, historically closed and theoretically productive in-between of Sinology and comparative literature.

Keywords

CS

Literárnost; typologický přístup k literárnosti čínská literárnost; Umění číst; čtení a jiné čtení; epický a lyrický hlavní kód; lineární a nelineární historičnost

EN

Literariness; typological approach to literariness; Chinese literariness; The art of reading; reading and re-reading; epic and lyric general code; linear and unlinear historicity

Discipline

• PHILOLOGY_&_LINGUISTICS: PHILOLOGY & LINGUISTICS

• Publisher: Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Arts, Czech Republic
• Journal: Svět literatury – Časopis pro novodobé literatury (World of Literature – Journal for Modern Literatures)
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 55
• Pages: 9-21

Contributors

author

Král Oldřich

• Ústav české literatury a komparatistiky Filozofické fakulty Univerzity Karlovi