Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2017 | 12 | 1 | 47-65

Article title

Spatial Variation of Public-Private Wage Differentials

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The aim of this paper is to estimate the adjusted sectoral wage gap in Poland and to examine its spatial differences in terms of the size of settlement units. In particular, a hypothesis that there is a negative relation between the public-sector wage premium and the size of a settlement unit is tested. We use a set of individual data from the representative survey Human Capital Balance (BKL) carried out in Poland for the period from 2010 to 2014. We apply the control function approach (both with homogeneous and heterogeneous impacts) to address the problem of selection mechanism. We show that, after controlling for structural differences in employment, generally there is a moderate positive premium related to public employment. However, this premium differs between types of settlement units, with public employment being most attractive in medium-sized cities. This may pose a challenge for the public sector regarding attracting highly qualified employees in the biggest cities. As a consequence, the efficiency of public-sector services provision (education, healthcare, administration) may be seriously threatened.

Year

Volume

12

Issue

1

Pages

47-65

Physical description

Dates

published
2017-03-31

Contributors

References

  • Adamchik V., Bedi A. 2000. Wage differentials between the public and the private sectors: evidence from an economy in transition. Labour Economics, 7: 203-224.
  • Adamchik V., Hycak T., King A. 2003. The wage structure and wage distribution in Poland, 1994-2001. International Journal of Manpower, 24: 916-946.
  • Aktywność ekonomiczna ludności Polski. 2016. Główny Urząd Statystyczny, Warszawa.
  • Barnow B.S., Cain G.G., Goldberger A.S. 1981. Issues in the analysis of selectivity bias. In: Evaluation Studies Review Annual, Vol. 5. Eds. E.W. Stromsdorfer, G. Farkas. Sage, Beverly Hills, p. 123-126.
  • Bebchuk L.A., Fried J.M. 2004. Stealth compensation via retirement benefits. Working paper (10742), National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Borjas G.J. 1984. Electoral cycles and the earnings of federal bureaucrats. Economic Inquiry, 22(4): 447-459.
  • Burgess S., Metcalfe P. 1999. The Use of Incentive Schemes in the public and private sectors: evidence from British Establishments. CMPO Working Paper, 99/015.
  • Dell'Aringa C., Lucifora C., Origo F. 2007. Public sector pay and regional competitiveness. A first look at regional public-private wage differentials in Italy. The Manchester School, 75(4): 445-478.
  • Disney R., Gosling A. 2003. A new method for estimating public sector pay premia: evidence from Britain in the 1990s. Centre for Economic Policy Research, (CEPR) discussion paper, 3787.
  • Fogel W., Lewin D. 1974. Wage determination in the public sector. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 27: 410-431.
  • Fujita M., Krugman P. 2004. The new economic geography: past, present and the future. Papers in Regional Science, 83(1): 139-164.
  • Garcia-Perez J.I., Jimeno J.F. 2007. Public sector wage gaps in Spanish regions. The Manchester School, 75(4): 501-531.
  • Grotkowska G., Wincenciak L. 2014. Public-sector wage premium in Poland: can it be explained by structural differences in employment? Ekonomia: Rynek, Gospodarka, Społeczeństwo, 38: 47-72.
  • Heckman J.J. 1976. The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5(4): 475-492.
  • Heitmueller A. 2006. Public-private sector pay differentials in a devolved Scotland. Journal of Applied Economics, 9: 295-323.
  • Holmlund B. 1993. Wage setting in private and public sectors in a model with endogenous government behaviour. European Journal of Political Economy, 9: 149-162.
  • Horner J., Ngai L.R., Olivetti C. 2007. Public enterprises and labor market performance. International Economic Review, 48(2): 363-384.
  • ILO. 2016. http://laborsta.ilo.org/ (access: 25.08.2016).
  • Keane P.M., Prasad E.S. 2006. Changes in the structure of earnings during the Polish transition. Journal of Development Economics, 80: 389-427.
  • Lausev J. 2012. Public-private earnings differentials during economic transition in Hungary. Budapest Working Papers, 2.
  • Lehmann H., Wadsworth J. 2000. Tenures that shook the world: worker turnover in Russia, Poland, and Britain. Journal of Comparative Economics, 28: 639-664.
  • Maczulskij T. 2013. Public-private sector wage differentials and the business cycle. Economic Systems, 37(2): 284-301.
  • MADDALA G.S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge university Press, cambridge.
  • Makepeace G., Marcenaro-Gutierrez O. 2006. The earnings of workers covered by pay review bodies: evidence from the labour force survey. Report for the Office of Manpower Economics.
  • Manning A. 2003. Monopsony in Motion: Imperfect Competition in Labor Markets. Princeton university Press.
  • Meurs D., Edon C. 2007. France: a limited effect of regions on public wage differentials? The Manchester School, 75(4): 479-500.
  • Mincer J. 1974. Schooling, experience, and earnings. Human Behavior & Social Institutions, 2.
  • Mueller R. 1998. Public-private sector wage differentials in Canada: evidence from quantile regressions. Economics Letters, 60: 229-235.
  • Murphy K.M., Topel R.H. 1990. Efficiency wages reconsidered: theory and evidence. In: Advances in the Theory and Measurement of Unemployment. Palgrave Macmillan UK, p. 204-240.
  • Newell A., Socha M. 1998. Wages distribution in Poland: the roles of privatization and international trade, 1992-1996. Economics of Transition, 6: 47-65.
  • Newell A., Socha M. 2007. The Polish wage inequality explosion. Economics of Transition, 15: 733-758.
  • Public Sector Pay Determination in the European Union. 1999. Eds. R. Elliott, C. Lucifora, D. Meurs. Springer, Palgrave Macmillan uK.
  • Rutkowski J. 1996. High skills pay off: the changing wage structure during the transition in Poland. Economics of Transition, 4: 89-111.
  • Rutkowski J. 1997. Low wage employment in transitional economies of Central and Eastern Europe. MOST: Economic Policy in Transitional Economies, 7(1): 105-130.
  • Silvestre J.J., Eyraud F. 1995. Pay Determination in the Public Sector: An International Comparison Between France, Great Britain, & Italy. Vol. 6. International Labour Office.
  • Socha M.W., Weisberg J. 2002. Earnings in Poland: the private versus the public sector. Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance and Business Ventures, 7(3): 17-37.
  • Zatrudnienie i wynagrodzenia w gospodarce narodowej w I kwartale 2016. 2016. Główny Urząd Statystyczny, Warszawa.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-4a592637-24dc-482a-8968-d7c7943c236e
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.