Visual metaphor as an intersemiotic translation technique: the case of Peter Jackson’s The Lord of the Rings On “dangerous liaisons” between literature and film

• Authors: Stodolna Aleksandra

Title variants

PL

Metafora wizualna jako technika przekładu intersemiotycznego na przykładzie Władcy Pierścieni

• Languages of publication: EN PL FR

Abstracts

EN

Literature and film, since the birth of the latter, have been developing together and influencing one another. Although incomparable on the constructional level, those two arts are similar in nature. Narrative techniques applied in literature and film are interrelated: they use many similar techniques to tell their stories, but above all, they use similar techniques to evoke emotions in their audience. In their analyses, Film Studies researchers often evoke two basic factors: plot and emotions – these are the bases for comparison between film and literature, for discerning intersemiotic translation techniques, and also the baseline for my short analysis. In this paper, I will start with pointing out a few key issues related to intersemiotic translation in the context briefly discussed above, then pass on to visual metaphor: its structure, types, and possible functions, and finally – to case studies that will illustrate how filmmakers use the visual metaphor in their work: “light is good/dark is evil” metaphor and the case of Sméagol/Gollum’s split personality in The Lord of the Rings trilogy directed by Peter Jackson.

Keywords

EN

intersemiotic translation; visual metaphor; film

• Publisher: Księgarnia Akademicka
• Journal: Między Oryginałem a Przekładem
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 36
• Pages: 117-128

Contributors

author

Stodolna Aleksandra

References

• Primary: Tolkien J.R.R. (2004), The Silmarillion, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
• Tolkien, J.R.R. (2005), The Lord of the Rings, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
• Secondary: Aldrich, V. (1968), “Visual metaphor”, The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 2, 1.4 Source of the data: filmweb.pl – 1.03.2016.
• Coëgnarts, M., Kravanja, P. (2012), “From Thought to Modality: A Theoretical Framework for Analyzing Structural‑Conceptual Metaphors and Image Metaphors in Film”, Image & Narrative, 13, 1.
• Forceville, Ch. (2009), “Multimodal metaphor”, in: Applications of Cognitive Linguistics, De Gruyter, Berlin.
• Forceville, Ch. (2012), Light and Dark in Feature Film, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
• Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980), Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
• Hopfinger, M. (1974), Adaptacje filmowe utworów literackich, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wrocław.
• Murch, W. (2006), W mgnieniu oka. Sztuka montażu filmowego, Wydawnictwo W. Marzec, Warszawa.
• Sibley, B. (2002), The Lord of the Rings: The Making of the Movie Trilogy, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
• Starski, A. (2013), Scenografia, Wydawnictwo W. Marzec, Warszawa.
• Wysłouch, S. (2013), “Adaptacja filmowa jako przekład intersemiotyczny”, in: Heydel, M., Bukowski, P., Polska myśl przekładoznawcza. Antologia, Wydawnictwo UJ, Kraków.

Identifiers

DOI

10.12797/MOaP.23.2017.36.07