Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2015 | 4 | 18-33

Article title

Posthuman – Postnature? Transhumanism and Environmental Ethics

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The author proposes a set of possible objections and amendments to the notion of transhumanism that can be made from the standpoint of environmental ethics. The transhumanist movement, as it is developed by such researchers as Nick Bostrom, Ingmar Persson, Julian or Savulescu, is devoted to identifying the best ways and measures of utilizing the scientific knowledge of human biology in order to allow people overcoming the limits of their current biological condition. However, such project raises several moral, ethical, political, and economical issues. It is worthwhile – in the author’s opinion – to broaden the discussion over transhumanism by including environmental issues, raised by such thinkers as Aldo Leopold or Paul W. Taylor. The author argues for a radical concept of enhancement – in opposition to Nicholas Agar’s “moderate enhancement”. The author believes that by introducing the Taylorian concept of “respect for nature”, it is possible to ameliorate the transhumanist program by – on one hand – identifying its possible shortcomings, but also by ensuring the care or the best possible ecological conditions for future generations.

Year

Issue

4

Pages

18-33

Physical description

Dates

published
2015-12-30

Contributors

  • Zakład Etyki, Instytut Filozofii, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, ul. Augustyna Szamarzewskiego 89C, 60-568 Poznań

References

  • Agar, N. (1997). Biocentrism and the Concept of Life. Ethics, 108(1), 147-168.Agar, N. (1998). Liberal Eugenics. Public Affairs Quarterly, 12(2), 137-155.
  • Agar, N. (2005). Liberal eugenics: in defence of human enhancement. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
  • Agar, N. (2014). Truly human enhancement: a philosophical defense of limits. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • Aristotle. (2012). Nicomachean ethics. (R. C. Bartlett, Trans.) (5. pr). Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
  • Bardziński, F. (2014). Czwarta rewolucja. Transformacja pojmowania natury ludzkiej w etyce schyłku XX wieku. Humaniora. Czasopismo internetowe, 1(5), 103-120.
  • Bashford, A., & Levine, P. (Eds.). (2010). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5th ed). New York, N.Y: Oxford University Press.
  • Bookchin, M. (1989). Death of a Small Planet. It’s growth that’s killing us. The Progressive, 19-23.
  • Bostrom, N. (2003). Human genetic enhancements: a transhumanist perspective. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 37(4), 493–506.
  • Bostrom, N. (2005a). A History of Transhumanist Thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14(1), 1–25.
  • Bostrom, N. (2005b). In Defense of Posthuman Dignity. Bioethics, 19(3), 202-214.
  • Bostrom, N. (2008). Why I Want to be a Posthuman When I Grow Up. In B. Gordijn & R. Chadwick (Eds.), Medical Enhancement and Posthumanity. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Brennan, A., & Lo, Y.-S. (2011). Environmental Ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011). Retrieved from: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/ethics-environmental/
  • Burdett, M.S. (2011). Contextualizing a Christian Perspective on Transcendence and Human Enhancement: Francis Bacon, N.F. Fedorov, and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. In: R. Cole-Turner (ed.), Transhumanism and Transcendence. Christian Hope in an Age of Technological Enhancement. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.
  • Dereniowska, M. (2012). On values of nature from the perspective of a pluralistic environmental ethics (Doctoral thesis). Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań. Retrieved from: https://repozytorium.amu.edu.pl/jspui/handle/10593/3939
  • Engel Jr., M. (2009). Taylor, Paul. In: J. B. Callicott & R. Frodeman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Environmental Ethics and Philosophy (Vol. 2, pp. 302-304). Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA.
  • Evans, J.C. (2005). With respect for nature: living as part of the natural world. New York: State University of New York Press.
  • Ferrando, F. (2013). Posthumanism, Transhumanism, Antihumanism, Metahumanism, and New Materialisms. Differences and Relations. Existenz, 8(2), 26-32.
  • Gould, S.J. (1980). The panda’s thumb: more reflections in natural history (1st ed). New York: Norton.
  • Habermas, J. (2006). The future of human nature. (W. Rehg, M. Pensky, & H. Beister, Trans.) (Reprinted). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Huxley, J. (2015). Transhumanism. Ethics in Progress, 6(1), 12-16. http://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2015.1.2
  • Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. (A. W. Wood, Trans.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Leopold, A. (1989). A Sand County almanac and sketches here and there (Special commemorative ed). New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
  • Lovelock, J. (2000). Gaia: a new look at life on earth. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Savulescu, J. (2001). Procreative Beneficence: Why We Should Select the Best Children. Bioethics, 15(5-6), 413-426. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00251
  • Savulescu, J. (2005). New breeds of humans: the moral obligation to enhance. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 10, 36–39. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62202-X
  • Savulescu, J. (2006). Justice, Fairness, and Enhancement. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1093(1), 321-338. http://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1382.021
  • Savulescu, J., & Persson, I. (2012). Moral Enhancement, Freedom, and the God Machine. The Monist, 95(3), 399-421.
  • Spaemann, R. (1998). Interwencje genetyczne w naturę ludzką: W aspekcie osobowego bycia człowieka. Ethos, 4(44), 109-117.
  • Spaemann, R. (2006). Begotten, Not Made. Communio. International Catholic Review, 33(2), 290-297.
  • Spaemann, R. (2012). Kroki poza siebie: Przemówienia i eseje. (J. Merecki, Trans.). Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
  • Sutter, S. M. (2007). A Brave New World of Designer Babies. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 22(2), 897-969.
  • Taylor, P. W. (1981). The Ethics of Respect for Nature. Environmental Ethics, 3(3), 197-218.Taylor, P. W. (2011). Respect for nature: a theory of environmental ethics (25th anniversary ed). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • United Nations. (2014). The millennium development goals report. 2014. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=858075.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-55954f3c-cc5c-4af4-a03f-478f199ded6c
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.