From Spatial Concepts to Time in the History of English: Continuity and Remoteness in Time Metonymy and Metaphor

• Authors: Dekeyser Xavier

Abstracts

EN

The study highlights the transition of the temporal adverbs always/algates, expressing continuity in time, and ago, expressing remoteness in time, from their historical prototypical concept of space to that of time and beyond. In these processes both metonymy and metaphor play an important role. The data regarding always and algates suggest a gradual cline from SPACE to TIME and an array of other meanings, subsumed under the cover-term UNCONSTRAINEDNESS. The SPACE-TIME-X chain (with X standing for other more abstract meanings) seems to occur in most languages. The semantic development of these adverbs also features all the properties associated with a change like this: metonymy followed by ever increasing or proliferating metaphorization, fuzzy or non-discrete categories (mostly in the stages of transition). Ago owes its origin to the grammaticalization of the past participle of a verb of movement. This spatial concept is metaphorically mapped on to a new temporal prototype. As compared with always/algates, the temporal frame of ago is monosemous and marked throughout by metaphorization from ‘remoteness in space’ to ‘remoteness in time’.

Keywords

EN

continuity in time; remoteness in time; metaphorization; metonymization; grammaticalization; algates; always; ago

• Publisher: Institute of English Studies, University of Warsaw
• Journal: Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies
• Year: 2014
• Issue: 23/2
• Pages: 63-75

Contributors

author

Dekeyser Xavier

• Universiteit van Antwerpen
• KU Leuven

References

• Bosworth, Joseph, and T. Northcote Toller. 1898. An Anglo-Saxon dictionary. London: Oxford University Press.
• Middle English dictionary online (MED). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Available at http: // quod.lib umich.edu/m/med/.
• Oxford English dictionary online (OED). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at www. oed.com.
• Helsinki corpus of English texts. 1991. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.
• Dekeyser, Xavier. 1994. “The multal quantifiers much/many and their analogues: a historical lexicosemantic analysis”, Leuvense Bijdragen 83/4: 289–299.
• Dekeyser, Xavier. 2013. “Loss of the prototypical meaning related to lexical borrowing. The battle of (near) synonyms: A case study.” In: J. Fisiak – M. Bator (eds.), Historical English word-formation and semantics (Warsaw studies in English language and literature), Peter Lang: Frankfurt am Main, 245–257.
• Geeraerts, Dirk. 1997. Diachronic prototype semantics: a contribution to historical lexicology. (Oxford studies in lexicography and lexicology). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Geeraerts, Dirk. 2010. Theories of lexical semantics. (Oxford linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Goossens, L. 1990. “Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action”, Cognitive Linguistics I: 323–340.
• Heine, B., U. Claudi, and F. Hünnemeyer. 1991a. “From cognition to grammar – evidence from African languages”. In: E. Closs Traugott, and B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. I, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 149–187.
• Heine, B., U. Claudi, and F. Hünnemeyer. 1991b. Grammaticalization: a conceptual framework. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Hopper, P., and E. Closs Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Molencki, Rafał. Forthcoming. “The constructionalization of ago in Middle English”. Proceedings of ICOME 7, Lviv, 245–260.
• Sisam, K. (ed.). 1970 Fourteenth century verse and prose. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Taylor, J. 1997. Linguistic categorization: prototypes in linguistics. (2nd ed.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Traugott, E. Closs. 1972. A history of English syntax: a transformational approach to the history of English sentence structure. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.